KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 5

Reliability of the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures

Erman ÇEKİÇ
Emin ALICI
MURAT YEŞİL
Sayfa
533–540
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The RUST scoring system appears to be a reliable tool for the evaluation of clinical outcomes in management of tibial fracture.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the recently developed Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures (RUST) scoring system and clinical outcomes in tibial fractures.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The study included 41 patients with tibia shaft fractures who underwent intramedullary nailing between 2005 and 2010.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The RUST scoring system appears to be a reliable tool for the evaluation of clinical outcomes in management of tibial fracture.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the recently developed Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures (RUST) scoring system and clinical outcomes in tibial fractures. Methods: The study included 41 patients with tibia shaft fractures who underwent intramedullary nailing between 2005 and 2010. Mean follow-up period was 26.32 (range: 12 to 48) months. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Karlström-Olerud physical function scale, VAS score and SF-36 physical function and pain scores during follow-up. RUST scores were noted after radiological evaluation. Results: RUST scores accurately reflected healing and union of the bone (p<0.05). RUST scoring also showed significant correlation with widely used physical and pain scoring systems (SF-36, VAS and Karlström-Olerud). Conclusion: The RUST scoring system appears to be a reliable tool for the evaluation of clinical outcomes in management of tibial fracture.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇEKİÇ, E., ALICI, E., YEŞİL, M. (2014). Reliability of the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 5, 533–540. https://ajindex.com/articles/354409

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Checketts RG, Moran CG, Jennings AG. 134 tibial shaft fractures managed with the Dynamic Axial Fixator. Acta Orthop Scand 1995;66:271-4
  2. Panjabi MM, Walter SD, Karuda M, White AA, Lawson JP. Correlations of radiographic analysis of healing fractures with strength: a statistical analysis of experimental osteotomies. J Orthop Res 1985;3:212-8
  3. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, et al. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma 2010;68:629-32
  4. Karlström G, Olerud S. Fractures of the tibial shaft; a critical evaluation of treatment alternatives. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1974;105:82-115
  5. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978;37:378-81
  6. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:227-36
  7. Gallagher EJ, Liebman M, Bijur PE. Prospective validation of clinically important changes in pain severity measured on a visual analog scale. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:633-8
  8. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:3130-9
  9. Egol KA, Gruson K, Spitzer AB, Walsh M, Tejwani NC. Do successful surgical results after operative treatment of long-bone nonunions correlate with outcomes? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:2979-85
  10. Kooistra BW, Dijkman BG, Busse JW, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. The radiographic union scale in tibial fractures: reliability and validity. J Orthop Trauma 2010;24 Suppl 1:S81-6
  11. Reed LK, Mormino MA. Functional outcome after blade plate reconstruction of distal tibia metaphyseal nonunions: a study of 11 cases. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:81-6
  12. Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. Exchange nailing of ununited fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:177-88
  13. Tükenmez M, Tezeren G. The treatment of adult segmented tibial shaft fractures with Ilizarov circular external fixator. Türkiye Klinikleri J Medical Sci 2007;27:379-85
  14. Skoog A, Söderqvist A, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S. One-year outcome after tibial shaft fractures: results of a prospective fracture registry. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:210-5
  15. Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T 3rd. Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1862-8
  16. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-