Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2

A novel biological reconstruction of tibial bone defects arising after resection of tumors

Sayfa
248–254
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this method, stable internal fixation and active usage of extremities are provided until biological reconstruction, and possible wound problems can be completely eliminated during the duration of medical treatment of the tumor

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this paper is to describe a biologic reconstruction strategy for defects after resection of malignant tibia tumors.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Limb-sparing surgery was used for 4 patients with malignant tibia tumors.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this method, stable internal fixation and active usage of extremities are provided until biological reconstruction, and possible wound problems can be completely eliminated during the duration of medical treatment of the tumor
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to describe a biologic reconstruction strategy for defects after resection of malignant tibia tumors. Limb-sparing surgery was used for 4 patients with malignant tibia tumors. All patients were male, with an average age of 39.5 years (range: 34-46 years). Mean length of the resected tibia segment was 135 mm (range: 120-150 mm). The defects were primarily reconstructed with bone cement and locked plate until completion of the medical treatment of the tumor. The bone transport was made through locked plate, and the docking site was grafted at the final stage. Mean follow-up period was 49.75 months (range: 71-22 months). Mean distraction index was 1148 mm/days (range: 1130-1175 mm/days), and mean external fixation time was 167 days (range: 152-187 days). According to Paley, functional results were excellent in 2 cases and good in the other 2 cases. Radiological results were excellent in all cases. Two major and 2 minor complications were observed. In this method, stable internal fixation and active usage of extremities are provided until biological reconstruction, and possible wound problems can be completely eliminated during the duration of medical treatment of the tumor

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, B., YAVUZ, U., AKPINAR, E., ÖZDEN, E. (2016). A novel biological reconstruction of tibial bone defects arising after resection of tumors. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 2, 248–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/353972

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Kotz R, Dominkus M, Zettl T, Ritschl P, Windhager R, Gadner H, et al. Advances in bone tumour treatment in 30 years with respect to survival and limb salvage. A single institution experience. Int Orthop 2002;26:197-202.
  2. Demir B, Ozturk K, Oke R, Gursu S, Aydin KB, Sahin V. A modified technique of internal bone transport. Acta Orthop Belg 2008;74:216-21.
  3. Graci C, Maccauro G, Muratori F, Spinelli MS, Rosa MA, Fabbriciani C. Infection following bone tumor resection and reconstruction with tumoral prostheses: a literature review. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2010;23:1005- 13. Laitinen M, Hardes J, Ahrens H, Gebert C, Leidinger B, Langer M, et al. Treatment of primary malignant bone tu- mours of the distal tibia. Int Orthop 2005;29:255-9.
  4. Aksnes LH, Bauer HC, Jebsen NL, Follerås G, Allert C, Haugen GS, et al. Limb-sparing surgery preserves more function than amputation: a Scandinavian sarcoma group study of 118 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008;90:786- 94. Demir B, Gursu S, Oke R, Konya NM, Ozturk K, Sahin V. Shortening and secondary relengthening for chronically infected tibial pseudarthroses with poor soft tissues. J Or- thop Sci 2009;14:525-34.
  5. Ozaki T, Nakatsuka Y, Kunisada T, Kawai A, Dan'ura T, Naito N, et al. High complication rate of reconstruction using Ilizarov bone transport method in patients with bone sarcomas. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;118:136-9. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990;250:81-104.
  6. Eralp L, Kocaoglu M, Yusof NM, Bulbul M. Distal tibial reconstruction with use of a circular external fixator and an intramedullary nail. The combined technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2218-24.
  7. Ahmed I, Robinson CM, Patton JT, Cook RE. Meta- static adenocarcinoma after intramedullary fixation of a tibial fracture: A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:1592-5.
  8. Oh CW, Shetty GM, Song HR, Kyung HS, Oh JK, Min WK, et al. Submuscular plating after distraction osteo- genesis in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 2008;17:265-9.
  9. Weninger P, Tschabitscher M, Traxler H, Pfafl V, Hertz H. Intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures--an anatomical study comparing three lateral starting points for nail insertion. Injury 2010;41:220-5.
  10. Ayerza MA, Farfalli GL, Aponte-Tinao L, Muscolo DL. Does increased rate of limb-sparing surgery affect survival in osteosarcoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:2854- 9. Enneking WF. History of orthopedic oncology in the United Sta