Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2016 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis by using proximal humeral locking plate

Sayfa
389–392
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This is anopen access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiological results oftibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) with proximal humeral locking plate.Material and methods: Eight patients (7 female, 1 male; average age 53 years (range: 24e67)) who underwent TTCA with proximal humeral locking plate between 2009 and 2011, were retrospectivelyevaluated with AOFAS hindfoot scale and Maryland foot score system.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The mean follow up was 32.6months (range: 23e54).Results: Complete fusion was achieved in 7 patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This is anopen access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term clinical and radiological results oftibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) with proximal humeral locking plate.Material and methods: Eight patients (7 female, 1 male; average age 53 years (range: 24e67)) who underwent TTCA with proximal humeral locking plate between 2009 and 2011, were retrospectivelyevaluated with AOFAS hindfoot scale and Maryland foot score system. The mean follow up was 32.6months (range: 23e54).Results: Complete fusion was achieved in 7 patients. Soft tissue infection was observed in 2 patients andreflex sympathetic dystrophy in 3 patients. All patients recovered with medical treatment. At the Şnalfollow-up, mean AOFAS Hindfoot score was 60 (range: 41e81) and Maryland Foot Score was 67.8 (range:41e85). The satisfactory rates of AOFAS and MFS were found as 12.5% (1/8) and 50% (4/8), respectively.One patient had an incomplete union with 5 degrees of heel varus deformity and 5 degrees of equinusdeformity was observed in another. There were no implant failure or deformation of the plate during thefollow-up period.Conclusion: Our study suggests that proximal humeral plate may be an alternative forŞxation intibiotalocalcaneal fusion surgery.© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is anopen access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZER, D., BAYHAN, A. İ., KESKİN, A., SARI, S., KAYGUSUZ, M. A. (2016). Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis by using proximal humeral locking plate. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 389–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/353964

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Blankenhorn BDSC. Ankle arthritis. In: MJ Coughlin CS, Anderson RB, eds. Mann's Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. Elsevier
  2. 1037e1077. Ahmad J, Pour AE, Raikin SM. The modiŞed use of a proximal humeral locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007
  3. 977e983. Lowery NJ, Joseph AM, Burns PR. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with the use of a humeral locking plate. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009
  4. 485e492. Table of Contents. Cooper PS. Complications of ankle and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001
  5. 33e44. Chodos MD, Parks BG, Schon LC, Guyton GP, Campbell JT. Blade plate compared with locking plate for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 2008
  6. 219e224. O'Neill PJ, Logel KJ, Parks BG, Schon LC. Rigidity comparison of locking plate and intramedullaryŞxation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2008
  7. 581e586. DiDomenico LA, Wargo-Dorsey M. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a femoral locking plate. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012
  8. 128e132. Chiodo CP, Acevedo JI, Sammarco VJ, et al. Intramedullary rodŞxation compared with blade-plate-and-screwŞxation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrod- esis: a biomechanical investigation. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2003:2425e2428, 85- A(12). Alfahd U, Roth SE, Stephen D, Whyne CM. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and blade plateŞxation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2005
  9. 703e708. Bennett GL, Cameron B, Njus G, Saunders M, Kay DB. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical assessment of stability. Foot Ankle Int. 2005
  10. 530e536. Ohlson BL, Shatby MW, Parks BG, White KL, Schon LC. Periarticular locking plate vs intramedullary nail for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a biomechanical investigation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011
  11. 78e83. Muckley T, Klos K, Drechsel T, Beimel C, Gras F, Hofmann GO. Short-term outcome of retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a curved intra- medullary nail. Foot Ankle Int. 2011
  12. 47e56. Niinimaki TT, Klemola TM, Leppilahti JI. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a compressive retrograde intramedullary nail: a report of 34 consecutive pa- tients. Foot Ankle Int. 2007
  13. 431e434. Thomas RL, Sathe V, Habib SI. The use of intramedullary nails in tibiotalo- calcaneal arthrodesis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2012
  14. 1e7. Jehan S, Shakeel M, Bing AJ, Hill SO. The success of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nailingea systematic review of the literature. Act