KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the shoulder rating questionnaire in patients with shoulder pain

Betül ÇİFTÇİ
Aslıhan UZUNKULAOĞLU
Deniz ÖKE TOPÇU
Sayfa
208–212
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Also, the test-retest method with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used todetermine reliability of the SRQ- T and its domains in group 1 and group 2.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the SRQ-T seems to be a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire to evaluate theshoulder pain in Turkish patients.Level of Evidence: Level II, Diagnostic Study

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: The aim of this study was to translate The Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) into Turkish and to determinethe validity and reliability of the translated version in patients shoulder pain.Material and Methods: The Turkish version of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ-T) was applied to patients aftertranslation from English into Turkish.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients with various shoulder pain complaint were included into the study if theywere over 18 years.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Also, the test-retest method with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used todetermine reliability of the SRQ- T and its domains in group 1 and group 2.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the SRQ-T seems to be a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire to evaluate theshoulder pain in Turkish patients.Level of Evidence: Level II, Diagnostic Study
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: The aim of this study was to translate The Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) into Turkish and to determinethe validity and reliability of the translated version in patients shoulder pain.Material and Methods: The Turkish version of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ-T) was applied to patients aftertranslation from English into Turkish. Patients with various shoulder pain complaint were included into the study if theywere over 18 years. The patients with mixed-type pain, cancer pain, headache, substance abuse, severe depression, andfibromyalgia syndrome were excluded. The musculoskeletal and neurological examinations of the patients were performed.The Turkish version of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ-T) and Disabilities of arm, shoulder, hands-T (DASH-T) wereapplied to all patients.Results: 122 patients were included in the study, and then patients are divided into two groups: Group 1, working group (n = 72);Group 2, non- working group (n = 50). The reliability and consistency of SRQ-T for all the samples were acceptable with aCronbach’s coefficient of 0.979. The test-retest method was used to determine reliability of the scale. Cronbach’s alpha wasmeasured pre-assessment and post- assessment; the values were 0.815 and 0.770, respectively. The correlation analysis wasdetermined for all the samples and calculated as 0.780. Also, the test-retest method with Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used todetermine reliability of the SRQ- T and its domains in group 1 and group 2.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the SRQ-T seems to be a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire to evaluate theshoulder pain in Turkish patients.Level of Evidence: Level II, Diagnostic Study

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇİFTÇİ, B., UZUNKULAOĞLU, A., TOPÇU, D. Ö. (2021). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the shoulder rating questionnaire in patients with shoulder pain. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3, 208–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/353928

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Urwin M, Symmons D, Allison T, et al. Estimating the burden of musculoskeletal disorders in the community: The comparative prevalence of symptoms at different anatomical sites, and the relation to social deprivation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998;57(11):649-655. 10.1136/ard.57.11.649 2. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, et al. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73-81. 10.1080/03009740310004667 3. Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, et al. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006;45(2):215-221. 10.1093/rheumatol ogy/kei139 4. Bergman S, Herrström P, Högström K, Petersson IF, Svensson B, Jacobsson LT. Chronic musculoskeletal pain, prevalence rates, and sociodemographic associations in a Swedish population study. J Rheumatol. 2001;28(6):1369-1377. 5. Greenberg DL. Evaluation and treatment of shoulder pain. Med Clin North Am. 2014;98(3):487-504. 10.1016/j.mcna.2014.01.016 6. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Burnet EN. Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2004;17(2):152-164. 10.1197/j.jht.2004.02.004 7. van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: Incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995;54(12):959-964. 10.1136/ard.54.12.959 8. Gebremariam L, Hay EM, van der Sande R, Rinkel WD, Koes BW, Huisstede BM. Subacromial impingement syndrome—effectiveness of physiotherapy and manual therapy. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(16):1202-1208. 10.1136/bjsports2012-091802 9. Holmes RE, Barfield WR, Woolf SK. Clinical evaluation of nonarthritic shoulder pain: Diagnosis and treatment. Phys Sportsmed. 2015;43(3):262-268. 10.1080/00913847.2015.1005542 10. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3(6):347-352. 10.1016/ S1058-2746(09)80019-0. 11. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) [published correction appears in Am J Ind Med 1996 Sep;30(3):372]. Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602-608. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6%3C;602::AIDAJIM4%3E;3.0.CO;2-L 12. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional a