KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2014 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Use of femoral nail with spiral blade in subtrochanteric fractures

Masood UMER
Haroon RASHID
Idrees SHAH
Irfan QADIR
Sayfa
32–36
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We think that this is a superior device compared to conventional methods of fixation for subtrochanteric fractures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of acute subtrochanteric fractures managed with intramedullary nail and spiral blade fixation of the proximal fragment.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Charts of 33 patients (17 males and 16 females) with acute subtrochanteric fractures operated with intramedullary nail and spiral blade at our institution between March 2006 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We think that this is a superior device compared to conventional methods of fixation for subtrochanteric fractures.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of acute subtrochanteric fractures managed with intramedullary nail and spiral blade fixation of the proximal fragment. Methods: Charts of 33 patients (17 males and 16 females) with acute subtrochanteric fractures operated with intramedullary nail and spiral blade at our institution between March 2006 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. The most common (67%) mechanism of injury was ground-level fall, predominantly involving elderly patients. Results were evaluated in terms of union time, implant failure rate, infection rate and functional outcome. Results: Mean duration of surgery was 2.4 hours and average length of hospital stay was 7 days. Mean radiological healing time was 16 weeks. Good healing occurred in 31 (94%) patients within 6 months of surgery. Uneventful healing occurred in 28 (85%) patients and 3 (9%) had delayed healing requiring dynamization in two patients and bone grafting in one. Implant failure occurred in 2 (6%) patients within 2 months of index surgery requiring repeat surgery. One (3%) patient had varus malunion. Conclusion: Intramedullary nailing with spiral blade is a good option for acute subtrochanteric fractures with promising results. We think that this is a superior device compared to conventional methods of fixation for subtrochanteric fractures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UMER, M., RASHID, H., SHAH, I., QADIR, I. (2014). Use of femoral nail with spiral blade in subtrochanteric fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 32–36. https://ajindex.com/articles/353627

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Lavelle DG. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2003. p. 2897
  2. Wheeler DL, Croy TJ, Woll TS, Scott MD, Senft DC, Duwelius PJ. Comparison of reconstruction nails for high subtrochanteric femur fracture fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997;338:231-9
  3. Sims SH. Subtrochanteric femur fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2002;33:113-26 4. Craig NJ, Maffulli N. Subtrochanteric fractures: current management options. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1181-90
  4. Halwai MA, Dhar SA, Wani MI, Butt MF, Mir BA, Ali MF, et al. The dynamic condylar screw in the management of subtrochanteric fractures: does judicious use of biological fixation enhance overall results? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2007;2:77-81
  5. Miclau T, Martin RE. The evolution of modern plate osteosynthesis. Injury 1997;28 Suppl 1:A3-6
  6. Bedi A, Toan Le T. Subtrochanteric femur fractures. Orthop Clin North Am 2004;35:473-83
  7. DeLee JC, Clanton TO, Rockwood CA Jr. Closed treatment of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur in a modified cast-brace. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:773-9
  8. Tencer AF, Johnson KD, Johnston DW, Gill K. A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Res 1984;2:297-305
  9. Jiang LS, Shen L, Dai LY. Intramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with long proximal femoral nail or long gamma nail: technical notes and preliminary results. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2007;36:821-6
  10. Vaidya SV, Dholakia DB, Chatterjee A. The use of a dynamic condylar screw and biological reduction techniques for subtrochanteric femur fracture. Injury 2003;34:123-8
  11. Siebenrock KA, Müller U, Ganz R. Indirect reduction with a condylar blade plate for osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury 1998;29 Suppl 3:C7- 15
  12. Hoffmann R, Südkamp NP, Müller CA, Schütz M, Haas NP. Osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures with the modular interlocking system of unreamed AO femoral intramedullary nail. Initial clinical results. [Article in German] Unfallchirurg 1994;97:568-74. [Abstract] 14. Broos PL, Reynders P. The use of the unreamed AO femoral intramedullary nail with spiral blade in nonpathologic fractures of the femur: experiences with eighty consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:150-4
  13. Vanderschot P, Vanderspeeten K, Verheyen L, Broos P. A review on 161 subtrochanteric fractures--risk factors influencing outcome: age, fracture pattern and fracture level. Unfallchirurg 1995;