Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1

Importance of measurement methods and demographic characteristics in evaluating ulnar variance: A retrospective comparative study

Sayfa
62–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These differences should be considered in the treatment planning of patients withwrist disorders.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to compare 2 methods of ulnar variance (UV) measurement (the perpendicular method and the circularmethod) and to determine whether UV changed based on the demographic characteristics (sex and age).Methods: UV was measured on bilateral wrist radiographs of 124 patients (62 men, 62 women; mean age=48.5 years; range=18-79 years)who had no history of trauma, congenital wrist anomaly, previous wrist surgery, and wrist osteoarthritis by a single radiologist with 4years of experience.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All measurements were made on standardized radiographic images using 2 methods: the perpendicular method andthe circular method.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These differences should be considered in the treatment planning of patients withwrist disorders.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to compare 2 methods of ulnar variance (UV) measurement (the perpendicular method and the circularmethod) and to determine whether UV changed based on the demographic characteristics (sex and age).Methods: UV was measured on bilateral wrist radiographs of 124 patients (62 men, 62 women; mean age=48.5 years; range=18-79 years)who had no history of trauma, congenital wrist anomaly, previous wrist surgery, and wrist osteoarthritis by a single radiologist with 4years of experience. All measurements were made on standardized radiographic images using 2 methods: the perpendicular method andthe circular method. All the patients were then divided into groups based on sex and age, and the study population was determined byselecting a similar number of patients for each sex and age group.Results: The mean UV of the right and left wrists was measured as 0.33 (range=−4.3 to 5.7) mm by the perpendicular method and as 0.034(range=−5 to 5.7) mm by the circular method. A significant difference was determined between the 2 measurement methods (p<0.001).There was a statistically significant difference between sex and UV values in the left wrist measurements by both methods (p<0.05). Asignificant correlation was found between the UV and age in both right and left side measurements, indicating a statistically significantdifference between the methods (p<0.001).Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrated significant differences in the UV measurement between the 2 methods. Furthermore,UV measurement may change based on age and sex. These differences should be considered in the treatment planning of patients withwrist disorders.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZTÜRK, S., KAHRAMAN, F., SALIM, H., ACAR, B., ÇALGÜNER, E., YOLCULAR, B. O., SİNDEL, T., SİNDEL, M. (2021). Importance of measurement methods and demographic characteristics in evaluating ulnar variance: A retrospective comparative study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 1, 62–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/353457

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Cerezal L, del Pinal F, Abascal F, Garcia-Valtuille R, Pereda T, Canga AImaging findings in ulnar-sided wrist impaction syndromes. Radiographics 2002; 22: 105-21
  2. De Smet L. Ulnar variance: Facts and fiction review article. Acta Orthop Belg 1994; 60: 1-9
  3. Pang EQ, Yao J. Ulnar-sided wrist pain in the athlete (TFCC/DRUJ/ECU). Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2017; 10: 53-61
  4. Bernstein DT, Linnell JD, Petersen NJ, Netscher DT. Correlation of the lateral wrist radiograph to ulnar variance: A cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43: 951. e1-951.e9
  5. Sayit E, Tanrıvermiş Sayit A, Bağır M, Terzi Y. Ulnar variance according to gender and side during aging: An analysis of 600 wrists. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018; 104: 865-9
  6. Palmer AK, Glisson RR, Werner FW. Ulnar variance determination. J Hand Surg Br 1982; 7: 376-9
  7. Jalan D, Elhence A, Yadav P. Measurement of ulnar variance in a regional subset of Indian population-A pilot study of 30 subjects. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: 5-8
  8. Chen WS, Wang J-W. Ageing does not affect ulnar variance: an investigation in Taiwan. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33: 797-9
  9. Nakamura R, Tanaka Y, Imaeda T, Miura T. The influence of age and sex on ulnar variance. Hand Surg 1991; 16: 84-8
  10. Acar B, Turan A, Köse Ö, Özturk S, Sindel M. Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrodesis using limited wrist fusion plates in Kienböck’s Disease. Cureus 2019; 11: e4025
  11. Aydemir AN, Gönen M, Yörükoğlu AC, Yücens M, Demirkan AF. The use of fourth extensor compartment artery bone flap in Kienbock’s disease. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019; 30:124-9
  12. Elsaftawy A. Radiological investigation of relationship between lunate type and ulnar variance. Pol Przegl Chir 2013; 85: 576-80
  13. Parker AS, Nguyen M, Minard CG, Guffey D, Willis MH, Reichel LM. Measurement of ulnar variance from the lateral radiograph: A comparison of techniques. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39: 1114-21
  14. Steyers CM, Blair WF. Measuring ulnar variance: a comparison of techniques. J Hand Surg 1989; 14: 607-12.