Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3

The influence of central pain modulation on postoperative outcomes after shoulder surgery: A systematic review

Sayfa
227–234
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Surgeons and physical therapists should look for patients with signs of altered central pain modulationbefore surgery as they might be at risk of unfavorable outcome.Level of Evidence: Level II, Therapeutic Study

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review whether the altered central pain modulation has a significantinfluence on post-surgical outcomes in patients undergoing shoulder surgery due to musculoskeletal disorders.Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PEDro, and EMBASE was conducted without time restriction, includingobservational prognostic studies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A review protocol is published in the PROSPERO registry(CRD42019122303).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Surgeons and physical therapists should look for patients with signs of altered central pain modulationbefore surgery as they might be at risk of unfavorable outcome.Level of Evidence: Level II, Therapeutic Study
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review whether the altered central pain modulation has a significantinfluence on post-surgical outcomes in patients undergoing shoulder surgery due to musculoskeletal disorders.Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, PEDro, and EMBASE was conducted without time restriction, includingobservational prognostic studies. Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool was adopted for critical appraisal, and a qualitativesynthesis was undertaken. Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of biasassessment; any disagreement was resolved by a third author. A review protocol is published in the PROSPERO registry(CRD42019122303). The data regarding the potential predictors and outcome measures were obtained from the studies.Results: 11 prospective cohort studies were appraised. Overall, 952 patients were included with a sample size that ranged from 20to 314. Studies included both arthroscopy and open surgery and presented low to moderate ROB. The prognostic factorsinvestigated were depression, psychological distress, anxiety, catastrophizing, fear avoidance beliefs, self-efficacy andquantitative sensory testing. Only avoidance behaviors and self-efficacy were significantly related to post-surgical pain andfunction at 12 months after surgery.Conclusion: Fear avoidance beliefs and inadequate coping strategies seem to be the most correlated factors with the worst painand function scores. Surgeons and physical therapists should look for patients with signs of altered central pain modulationbefore surgery as they might be at risk of unfavorable outcome.Level of Evidence: Level II, Therapeutic Study

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

INNOCENTI, T., RISTORI, D., GALANTINI, P., TESTA, M., BARI, M. D. (2021). The influence of central pain modulation on postoperative outcomes after shoulder surgery: A systematic review. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3, 227–234. https://ajindex.com/articles/353429

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bachasson D, Singh A, Shah SB, et al.The role of the peripheral and central nervous systems in rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015
  2. j.jse.2015.04.004 2. Croft P, Pope D, Silman A. The clinical course of shoulder pain: Prospective cohort study in primary care. Primary Care Rheumatology Society Shoulder Study Group. BMJ. 1996
  3. bmj.313.7057.601 3. Cuff D, Clark R, Pupello D, et al.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of rotator cuff deficiency: A concise follow-up, at a minimum of five years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012
  4. JBJS.K. 01206 4. Stiglitz Y, Gosselin O, Sedaghatian J, et al.Pain after shoulder arthroscopy: A prospective study on 231 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011
  5. j.otsr.2011.02.003 5. Dunn WR, Kuhn JE, Sanders R, et al.Neer Award: predictors of failure of nonoperative treatment of chronic, symptomatic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016
  6. j.jse.2016.04.030 6. Oh LS, Wolf BR, Hall MP, et al.Indications for rotator cuff repair: A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007
  7. BLO. 0b013e31802fc175 7. Wolf BR, Dunn WR, Wright RW. Indications for repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2007
  8. 0363546506295079 8. Duivenvoorden T, Vissers MM, Verhaar JA, et al.Anxiety and depressive symptoms before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A prospective multicentre study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013
  9. j.joca.2013. 08.022 9. Pakarinen M, Vanhanen S, Sinikallio S, et al.Depressive burden is associated with a poorer surgical outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: A 5-year follow-up study. Spine J. 2014
  10. j.spinee.2014.01.047 10. Giesinger JM, Kuster MS, Behrend H, et al.Association of psychological status and patient-reported physical outcome measures in joint arthroplasty: A lack of divergent validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2013
  11. 64 11. Nijs J, Torres-Cueco R, van Wilgen CP, et al.Applying modern pain neuroscience in clinical practice: Criteria for the classification of central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2014
  12. Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, et al.Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013
  13. 201302190-00009 13. Woollard JD, Bost JE, Pi