Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4

Results of the Novation CrowncupTM porous-coated uncemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year clinical and radiological assessment

Sayfa
311–315
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The Crowncup acetabular cup survivalrate was 97.5% including all causes of loosening and 95% including allcausesfor revision at 10 years of follow-up.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate theclinical, radiological, and survivorship results of a porous-coated uncementedacetabularcup (Novation Crowncup TM Exactech, Gainesville, Florida, USA) in patientsundergoing total hip arthroplasty at themid to long term follow-up.Methods: We prospectively analyzed 185 consecutivetotal hip replacements in 176 patients during 2009.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:All surgeries were performed by one ofthe 4 joint replacement specialists.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The Crowncup acetabular cup survivalrate was 97.5% including all causes of loosening and 95% including allcausesfor revision at 10 years of follow-up.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate theclinical, radiological, and survivorship results of a porous-coated uncementedacetabularcup (Novation Crowncup TM Exactech, Gainesville, Florida, USA) in patientsundergoing total hip arthroplasty at themid to long term follow-up.Methods: We prospectively analyzed 185 consecutivetotal hip replacements in 176 patients during 2009. All the patients receivedaNovation Crowncup™ uncemented cup. All surgeries were performed by one ofthe 4 joint replacement specialists. Severalclinical and radiographic outcomemeasures were evaluated.Results: There was no cupmigration recorded. Six cups (5.2%) had a thin (less than 1 mm) radiolucentline without signs ofloosening or clinical manifestation, but under close followup. The wear was not significative at the end of the follow up. Themean HarrisHip Score increased from 45.7 (range = 28 to 65) preoperatively to 89.8 (range= 87 to 96) at the final follow-up.Subjectiveevaluation showed excellent results in 82.6%, good in 8.6%, fair in 5.9%, andpoor in 2.9% of the cases. Eight patients, 3stems, and 5 cups (5% of the series)were revised, the survival of the series was 95% when the failure was the needfor additionalacetabular or femoral revision surgery for any reason. If wedefine failure as the need for an acetabular revision for some reason,thesurvival was (97.5%). When we evaluated survival only for aseptic loosening ofthe cup at 10 years of follow-up, 98.4% of theimplants survived.Conclusion: In our series,when we evaluated survival only for aseptic loosening of the cup at 10 years offollow-up, 98.4% of theimplants survived. The Crowncup acetabular cup survivalrate was 97.5% including all causes of loosening and 95% including allcausesfor revision at 10 years of follow-up.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GODOY-MONZON, D., GARCIA-MANSILLA, A., CASTEULANI, A. C., SVARZCHTEIN, S. (2021). Results of the Novation CrowncupTM porous-coated uncemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year clinical and radiological assessment. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 4, 311–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/353427

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Engesaeter LB. The performance of two hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups compared with Charnley cups. From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84-B(6):839- 845. 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.0840839 2. Shon WY, Park B-Y RRN, Park PS, Im JT, Yun HH. Total hip arthroplasty: Past, present, and future. what has been achieved? Hip Pelvis. 2019;31(4):179-189. 10.5371/hp.2019.31.4.179 3. Kindsfater K, Lesko J. Survivorship of a modular acetabular cup system: Medium- to long-term follow-up. Arthroplasty Today. 2018;4(3):376-382. 10. 1016/j.artd.2017.07.001 4. McLawhorn AS, Potter HG, Cross MB, et al. Posterior Soft Tissue Repair After Primary THA is Durable at Mid-term Followup: A Prospective MRI Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(10):3183-3189. 10.1007/s11999-015-4380-0 5. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stemtype femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(141):17-27.47710010.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_8 6. Loudon JR, Charnley J. Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62-B(4):450-453. 10.1302/0301-620X.62B4.7430222 7. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;(121):20-32.99150410.1097/ 00003086-197611000-00003 8. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217- 220. 10.2106/00004623-197860020-00014 9. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74-B(3):385-389. 10. 1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587883 10. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(8):1629-1632. 10.2106/00004623-197355080-00006 11. Martell JM, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(11):1635- 1641. 10.2106/00004623-199711000-00004 12. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):73