Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2021 / Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3

Bilateral brachial artery infiltration by tumoral calcinosis: A case report

Sayfa
281–284
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In such cases, detailed neurologic and vascular examination, including imaging modalities, forarterial flow is essential to establish a more accurate surgical plan and avoid any unexpected situation during surgery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:We, herein, presented a rare case of bilateral brachial artery infiltration by tumoral calcinosis located on both elbows.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A 58-yearold man presented with a history of painless, palpable solid mass restricting the range of motion of both elbows.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In such cases, detailed neurologic and vascular examination, including imaging modalities, forarterial flow is essential to establish a more accurate surgical plan and avoid any unexpected situation during surgery.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

We, herein, presented a rare case of bilateral brachial artery infiltration by tumoral calcinosis located on both elbows. A 58-yearold man presented with a history of painless, palpable solid mass restricting the range of motion of both elbows. These masseswere located on the anterior aspect of the elbows and gradually enlarged. After clinical, laboratory and radiologicalexaminations, tumoral calcinosis was suspected, and excisional biopsy was planned for a definite diagnosis. Surgery was firstperformed on the left elbow. The median nerve was found to be compressed but not infiltrated by the mass. Interestingly, thebrachial artery was totally infiltrated throughout the entire mass. Occlusion was observed in the brachial artery located withinthe mass. The tumor on the left elbow, 8.5 × 5.5 × 2.5 cm in size, was totally excised with approximately 12-cm brachial arterysegment. The artery was resected until the healthy tissue was reached. The defect was reconstructed with saphenous vein graftobtained from the ipsilateral lower extremity. The same surgical procedure was performed on the right elbow after 3 months. Thetumor size on the right elbow was 7 × 3.5 × 1.7 cm. Approximately 15-cm brachial artery segment was excised, and the defect wasreconstructed with saphenous vein graft. Tumoral calcinosis is a rare benign condition that can be located in close relationshipwith neurovascular structures. In such cases, detailed neurologic and vascular examination, including imaging modalities, forarterial flow is essential to establish a more accurate surgical plan and avoid any unexpected situation during surgery.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAVİT, A., ÇAPKIN, S., YILMAZ, K., KALELİ, T. (2021). Bilateral brachial artery infiltration by tumoral calcinosis: A case report. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 55 - Sayı: 3, 281–284. https://ajindex.com/articles/353408

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Olsen KM, Chew FS. Tumoral calcinosis: Pearls, polemics, and alternative possibilities. Radiographics. 2006;26:871-885. 10.1148/rg.263055099 2. Hammoud S, McCarthy EF, Weber K. Tumoral calcinosis in infants: A report of three cases and review of the literature. ClinOrthopRealt Res. 2005;436:261-264. 3. Duret MH. Tumeurs multiples et singularires des bourses sereuses. Bull Mem SocAnat Paris. 1899;74:725-731. 4. Inclan A. Tumoral calcinosis. JAMA. 1943;121:490-495. 10.1001/jama.1943. 02840070018005 5. Del Bravo V, Liuzza F, Perisano C, et al. Gluteal tumoral calcinosis. Hip Int. 2012;226:585-591. 10.5301/HIP.2012.10347 6. Senoul U, Karaali K, Cevikol C, Dincer A. MR imaging findings of recurrent tumoral calcinosis. J Clin Imaging. 2000;24:154-156. 10.1016/S0899-7071(00) 00190-X 7. Smack D, Norton SA, Fitzpatrick JE. Proposal for a pathogenesis-based classification of tumoral calcinosis. Int J Dermatol. 1996;35:265-271. 10.1111/j.1365- 4362.1996.tb02999.x 8. Hershkovitz D, Gross Y, Nahum S, et al. Functional characterization of SAMD9, a protein deficient in normophosphatemic familial tumoral calcinosis. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131:662-669. 10.1038/jid.2010.387 9. Tiwari V, Goyal A, Nagar M, Santoshi JA. Hyperphosphataemic tumoral calcinosis. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):168. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33045-9 10. Zein A, Alkhooly AA. Medical treatment for tumoral calcinosis with eight years of follow-up: a report of four cases. J OrthopSurg (Hong Kong). 2009;17:379-382. 10.1177/230949900901700328 11. Mozaffarian G. Phosphorus deprivation treatment of tumoral calcinosis. Ann Intern Med. 1977;86:120. 10.7326/0003-4819-86-1-120_2 12. Kirk TS, Simon MA. Tumoral calcinosis. Report of a case with successful medical management. J Bone Jt Surg. 1981;63:1167-1169. 10.2106/00004623- 198163070-00015 13. Hamada J, Tamai K, Ono W, Saotome K. Uremic tumoral calcinosis in hemodialysis patients: Clinicopathological findings and identification of calcific deposits. J Rheumatol. 2006;33:119-126. 14. Farzan M, Farhoud AR. Tumoral calcinosis: What is the treatment? Report of two cases of different types and review of the literature. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011;40:170-176. 15. Weiber H, Linell F. Tumoral calcinosis causing acute carpal tunnel syndrome: Case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1987;21(2):229-230. 10.3109/ 02844318709078105 16. Gautam VK, Khare GN, Nand S. Tumoral calcinosis causing carpal tunnel syndrome (a case report). Indian J Cancer. 1991;28(4): 228