Dergiler / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Weighted Comparison of the Corneal Topographic Data in Intracapsular versus Ciliary Sulcus Intraocular Lens Implantation during Phacoemulsification Surgery

Sayfa
188–193
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Visual acuity increased in both lens implants, but patients with intracapsular lenses had greater improvement in visual acuity; thus, intracapsular IOL implantation was more advantageous than sulcus IOL implantation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative changes in corneal topography, intraocular pressure (IOP), and visual acuity in patients who developed posterior capsule rupture during phacoemulsification surgery and simultaneously underwent ciliary sulcus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and in those with intact capsular integrity who simultaneously underwent intracapsular IOL implantation and to compare these changes within and between the two groups.Methods: Among the 855 patients, 92 eyes of 69 patients whose corneal topography, IOP, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were successfully measured were included in the study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Preliminary chamber parameters [horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID), iridocorneal angle, anterior chamber volume (ACV), and anterior chamber depth (ACD)] were measured before and after surgery using a Sirius corneal topography device.Results: The IOL was implanted in the capsular bag in 58 patients and in the ciliary sulcus between the posterior iris and the capsule in 34 patients.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Visual acuity increased in both lens implants, but patients with intracapsular lenses had greater improvement in visual acuity; thus, intracapsular IOL implantation was more advantageous than sulcus IOL implantation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative changes in corneal topography, intraocular pressure (IOP), and visual acuity in patients who developed posterior capsule rupture during phacoemulsification surgery and simultaneously underwent ciliary sulcus intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and in those with intact capsular integrity who simultaneously underwent intracapsular IOL implantation and to compare these changes within and between the two groups.Methods: Among the 855 patients, 92 eyes of 69 patients whose corneal topography, IOP, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were successfully measured were included in the study. Preliminary chamber parameters [horizontal visible iris diameter (HVID), iridocorneal angle, anterior chamber volume (ACV), and anterior chamber depth (ACD)] were measured before and after surgery using a Sirius corneal topography device.Results: The IOL was implanted in the capsular bag in 58 patients and in the ciliary sulcus between the posterior iris and the capsule in 34 patients. In the sulcus IOL group, both BCVA and IOP measurements statistically significantly increased in the postoperative period compared with the preoperative values (p<0.001). As regards postoperative changes between the intracapsular and sulcus IOL groups, no significant difference was found in the changes in HVID (p=0.584), iridocorneal angle (p=0.282), and ACD (p=0.382), whereas the changes in ACV, IOP, and BCVA were statistically significantly different (p=0.020, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively).Conclusion: While the IOP of the sulcus IOL group significantly increased, that of the intracapsular group significantly decreased. Visual acuity increased in both lens implants, but patients with intracapsular lenses had greater improvement in visual acuity; thus, intracapsular IOL implantation was more advantageous than sulcus IOL implantation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KALAYCI, M., Genç, S., ÇALIŞIR, K., ENDER, A., ATAKAN, M. (2020). Weighted Comparison of the Corneal Topographic Data in Intracapsular versus Ciliary Sulcus Intraocular Lens Implantation during Phacoemulsification Surgery. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 188–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/353073

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Asbell PA, Dualan I, Mindel J, Brocks D, Ahmad M, Epstein S. Age-related cataract. Lancet 2005;365:599–609
  2. Riaz Y, de Silva SR, Evans JR. Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens for age-related cataract. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;10:CD008813 3. Ali MH, Dikopf MS, Aref AA. Late Complications of Single-Piece Intraocular Lens Implantation in the Ciliary Sulcus. JAMA Ophthalmol 2018;136:825–6
  3. Jaffe NS, Jaffe MS, Jaffe GF. Cataract surgery and its complications. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 488–92
  4. Mehta R, Aref A. Intraocular Lens Implantation In The Ciliary Sulcus: Challenges And Risks. Clin Ophthalmol 2019;13:2317– 23
  5. Uy HS, Chan PST. Pigment Release and Secondary Glaucoma After Implantation of Single-piece Acrylic Intraocular Lenses in the Ciliary Sulcus. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:330–2
  6. Pereira FA., Cronemberger S. Ultrasound biomicroscopic study of anterior segment changes after phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1799–806
  7. Şimşek A, Bilgin B, Çapkın M, Bilak Ş, Güler M, Reyhan AH. Evaluation of Anterior Segment Parameter Changes Using the Sirius after Uneventful Phacoemulsification. Korean J Ophthalmol 2016;30:251–7
  8. Kampmeier J, Kurz S, Schütte E. Intraokulardruck nach extrakapsulärer Kataraktextraktion mit Hinterkammerlinsenimplantation - Sulcus-versus Kapselsack-Fixation. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1997;211:101–5
  9. Laurell C-G, Zetterström C, Lundgren B. Phacoemulsification and lens implantation in rabbit eyes: Capsular bag versus ciliary sulcus implantation and 4.0 versus 7.0 mm capsulorhexis. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:230–6
  10. Amino K, Yamakawa R. Long-term results of out-of-thebag intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:266–70
  11. Brazitikos PD, Balidis MO, Tranos P, Androudi S, Papadopoulos NT, Tsinopoulos IT, et al. Sulcus implantation of a 3-piece, 6.0 mm optic, hydrophobic foldable acrylic intraocular lens in phacoemulsification complicated by posterior capsule rupture. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:1618–22
  12. Kooner KS, Dulaney DD, Zimmerman TJ. Intraocular pressure following ECCE and IOL implantation in patients with glaucoma Ophthalmic Surg. 1988;19:570–5
  13. Blumenthal M, Glovinsky Y. Surgical consequences in coexisting cataract and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1995;6:15–8
  14. Ionides A. Visual outcome