Dergiler / Bezmiâlem Science / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Examination of Work and Engagement, Activity and Occupation Terms in Occupational Therapy Literature: Turkey Sample

Ergoterapi Literatüründe İş ve Uğraşı, Aktivite ve Oküpasyon Terimlerinin Kullanım Sürecinin İncelenmesi: Türkiye Örneklemi

Sayfa
444–450
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

To continue and deepen the studies and harmonize theterminology according to the spirit of time and changing conditionswill accelerate the development of OT paradigm in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Although the use of terms of work and engagement (WE), activity,and occupation varies from country to country, time and culturalstructure, these terms are among the most commonly used terms inoccupational therapy (OT).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The abstracts of national and international articles publishedin the Web of Science, Scopus, Index Medicus, Medline, Copernicus,EBSCO, Ulakbim Journal index and TR ATIF index between 1970-2018 were reviewed and 3467 articles were reached.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:To continue and deepen the studies and harmonize theterminology according to the spirit of time and changing conditionswill accelerate the development of OT paradigm in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Although the use of terms of work and engagement (WE), activity,and occupation varies from country to country, time and culturalstructure, these terms are among the most commonly used terms inoccupational therapy (OT). The aim of our study was to examinethe process of use, change and development of WE, activity andoccupation terms in the national and international literature in Turkey.A search by using the funnel method using “occupation”, “WE”,“WE treatment’’, “activity”, “occupation” and “OT” keywords wasdone. The abstracts of national and international articles publishedin the Web of Science, Scopus, Index Medicus, Medline, Copernicus,EBSCO, Ulakbim Journal index and TR ATIF index between 1970-2018 were reviewed and 3467 articles were reached. Two hundredand nineteen which met the inclusion criteria were included inthe study. The data obtained were recorded. It was found that innational and international studies, the terms “WE”, “activity” and“occupation" were both used in similar and different meanings. In thedevelopment process, it was observed that there was a shift towardsthe use of the terms “activity” and “occupation" by moving away fromthe term “WE” which had a limited conceptual content. Historicaldevelopment and change in the use of terms “WE”, “activity” and“occupation" in OT science are parallel with development of OT inour country. To continue and deepen the studies and harmonize theterminology according to the spirit of time and changing conditionswill accelerate the development of OT paradigm in Turkey.

Abstract

İş uğraşı, aktivite ve oküpasyon terimlerinin kullanımı ülkeden ülkeye, zamana ve kültürel yapıya göre değişiklik gösterse de bu terimler ergoterapide en sık kullanılan terimlerdendir. Çalışmamızın amacı; Türkiye’de iş uğraşı, aktivite ve okupasyon terimlerinin ulusal ve uluslararası literatürdeki kullanım, değişim ve gelişim süreçlerini incelemektir. Huni metodu ile “iş-uğraşı”, “iş ve uğraşı tedavisi”, “aktivite”, “oküpasyon” ve “ergoterapi” anahtar kelimeleri kullanılarak 1970-2018 yılları arasında Web of Science, Scopus, İndex Medicus, Medline, İndeks Kopernicus, Ebsco, Ulakbim Dergi Dizini ve TR DİZİN dizininde yayınlanan ulusal ve uluslararası makalelerin özetleri incelenerek 3467 makaleden oluşan bir veri havuz oluşturuldu. Veri havuzundan dâhil edilme kriterlerine uygun seçilen 219 makale çalışmaya dahil edildi. Elde edilen veriler kaydedildi. Ulusal ve uluslararası çalışmalarda “İş uğraşı”, “aktivite” ve “oküpasyon” terimlerinin zaman zaman birbirine benzer; zaman zaman ise birbirlerinden farklı anlamlarda kullanıldığı tespit edildi. Gelişim sürecinde kısıtlı kavramsal içeriği olan “iş uğraşı” teriminden uzaklaşılarak “aktivite” ve “oküpasyon” terimlerinin kullanımına doğru bir değişim olduğu gözlendi. Ergoterapi biliminde “işuğraşı”, “aktivite” ve “oküpasyon” terimlerinin kullanımındaki tarihsel gelişim ve değişim ergoterapinin ülkemizdeki gelişimi ile paralel seyretmektedir. Ergoterapi ile ilgili terminoloji çalışmalarının derinleştirilerek devam etmesi gelişen, değişen koşullara ve zamanın ruhuna göre uyumlandırmaların yapılması Türkiye’de ergoterapi paradigmasının alt yapısını güçlendirecek ve gelişimini hızlandıracaktır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HURİ, M., KÖSE, B., DAVUTOĞLU, C. (2020). Examination of Work and Engagement, Activity and Occupation Terms in Occupational Therapy Literature: Turkey Sample. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 444–450. https://ajindex.com/articles/352559

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Awaad J. Culture, cultural competency and occupational therapy: A review of the literature. BJOT 2003;66:356-62
  2. Breines EB. Understanding ‘occupation’as the founders did. BJOT 1995;58:458-60
  3. Christiansen C, Clark F, Kielhofner G, Rogers J. Position paper: occupation. American Occupational Therapy Association. Am J Occup Ther 1995;49:1015-8
  4. Cutchin MP, Dickie VA. Transactionalism: Occupational science and the pragmatic attitude. In: Whiteford GE, Hocking C, editors. Critical perspectives on occupational science: Society, inclusion, participation. Sydney, New South Wales: Wiley-Blackwell;2012. p. 23-37. 5. des Langues E, Malmberg B, Nickel LG, Heidelberg JGV. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. Stutgart;De Gruyter Mouton:2009
  5. Driver MF. A philosophic view of the history of occupational therapy in Canada. Can J Occup 1968;35:53-60
  6. Dunlop W. A brief history of occupational therapy. Can J Occup 1933;1:6-10
  7. Evans KA. Definition of occupation as the core concept of occupational therapy. Am J Occup Ther 1987;41:627-8
  8. Golledge J. Distinguishing between occupation, purposeful activity and activity, part 1: Review and explanation. BJOT 1998;61:100-5
  9. Huri M, Kayihan H. Investigation of the relationship between the level of independence in activities of daily living and cognitive function variables in geriatric individuals. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 2014;2:1-9
  10. Gleick J. Chaos: Making a new science. Open Road Media:2011 12. Kayihan H, Köse B. Vocational rehabilitation in Turkey and the world. Turkiye Klinikleri J Psychology-Special Topics 2018;3:30-41
  11. Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation: Theory and application. 4th edition. Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins;2002 14. Kielhofner G, Barrett L. Meaning and misunderstanding in occupational forms: A study of therapeutic goal setting. Am J OccupTher 1998;52:345-53
  12. Mahiroğullari A. The impact of globalization on cultural values. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi 2005:1275-88
  13. Nelson DL. Occupation: Form and performance. Am J Occup Ther 1998;42:633-41
  14. Nelson DL, Jonsson H. Occupational terms across languages and countries. J Occup Sci 1999;6:42-7
  15. Pekçetin S, Bumin G, Güngör T, Tunç S. The effect of perceived occupational performance on community participation and quality of life of gynecologic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Ergoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi, 2013;1:31-40
  16. Pendleton HM, Schultz-Krohn W.