KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2019 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2

Optimal Harvesting of a Prey-Predator Fishery: An Overlapping Generations Analysis

Av-Avcı Balıkçılığında Optimal Avlanma: Ardışık Nesiller Analizi

Burcu ÖZGÜN
Özgen ÖZTÜRK
Serkan KÜÇÜKŞENEL
Sayfa
106–121
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

MSY and MEY harvesting strategies with these three differentforms are given under perfect and imperfect fishing selectivity and presented both numericallyand graphically.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and maximum economic yield (MEY) harvesting strategies are characterized using an overlapping generations (OLG) model of heterogeneous (prey -predator) fishery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A proper modeling of real-life cycle dynamics of fish is introduced with a commonly used prey-predator interaction system of equations to create heterogeneity.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:MSY and MEY harvesting strategies with these three differentforms are given under perfect and imperfect fishing selectivity and presented both numericallyand graphically.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Maximum sustainable yield (MSY) and maximum economic yield (MEY) harvesting strategies are characterized using an overlapping generations (OLG) model of heterogeneous (prey -predator) fishery. A proper modeling of real-life cycle dynamics of fish is introduced with a commonly used prey-predator interaction system of equations to create heterogeneity. Preypredator interaction is modeled with three different functional forms: prey dependent, predator dependent and ratio dependent. MSY and MEY harvesting strategies with these three differentforms are given under perfect and imperfect fishing selectivity and presented both numericallyand graphically.

Abstract

Maksimum sürdürülebilir mahsul (MSM) ve maksimum ekonomik mahsul (MEM) avlanma stratejileri heterojen (av-avcı) ardışık nesiller balık popülasyon modeli içerisinde tanımlanmıştır. Balık popülasyon dinamikleri gerçekçi bir model ile ele alınmış ve yazında yaygın olarak kullanılan av-avcı etkileşim denklemleri modelimize entegre edilmiştir. Üç farklı formdaki av-avcı etkileşim denklemleri (av bağımlı, avcı bağımlı ve orana bağlı) ile tam veya kısıtlı ağ seçiciliği teknoloji koşulları altında maksimum sürdürülebilir mahsul ve maksimum ekonomik mahsul avlanma stratejileri numerik olarak çözülmüş ve sonuçlar grafiksel olarak sunulmuştur.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZGÜN, B., ÖZTÜRK, Ö., KÜÇÜKŞENEL, S. (2019). Optimal Harvesting of a Prey-Predator Fishery: An Overlapping Generations Analysis. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 2, 106–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/352198

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Abrams, P. A., & Ginzburg, L. R. (2000). The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 15(8), 337-341.
  2. Ahrens, R., Allen, M., Walters, C., & Arlinghaus, R. (2020). Saving large fish through harvest slots outperforms the classical minimum-length limit when the aim is to achieve multiple harvest and catch-related fisheries objectives. Fish and Fisheries, 1-28.
  3. Akcakaya, H. R., Arditi, R., & Ginzburg, L. R. (1995). Ratio dependent predation: an abstraction that works. Ecology, 76(3), 995-1004.
  4. Arditi, R., & Ginzburg, L. R. (1989). Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 139(3), 311-326.
  5. Barnett, L. A., Branch, T. A., Ranasinghe, R. A., & Essington, T. E. (2017). Old-growth fishes become scarce under fishing. Current Biology, 27(18), 2843-2848.
  6. Beddington, J. R. (1975). Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 331-340.
  7. Birkeland, C., & Dayton, P. K. (2005). The importance in fishery management of leaving the big ones. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20(7), 356-358
  8. Botsford, L. W. (1981). Optimal fishery policy for size-specific, density-dependent population models. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 12(3), 265-293.
  9. DeAngelis, D.L., Goldstein, R. & O’Neill, R.V. (1975).
  10. A model for trophic interaction, Ecology 56, 881–892.
  11. Diekert, F. K., Hjermann, D. O., Naevdal, E., & Stenseth, N. C. (2010). Spare the young fish: optimal harvesting policies for North-East Arctic cod. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47(4), 455-475
  12. Froese, R., Walters, C., Pauly, D., Winker, H., Weyl, O. L., Demirel, N., Tsikliras, A.C. & Holt, S. J. (2016). A critique of the balanced harvesting approach to fishing. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 73(6), 1640-1650.
  13. Garcia S. M., Kolding J., Rice J., Rochet M. J., Zhou S., Arimoto T., Beyer J. E.et al. (2012). Reconsidering the Consequences of Selective Fisheries. Science, 335, 1045-1047.
  14. Getz, W. M., & Haight, R. G. (1989). Population harvesting: demographic models of fish, forest, and animal resources (Vol. 27). Princeton University Press,
  15. Princeton, New Jersey. Grafton, R. Q. (2012). Maximum economic yield. In A Dictionary of Climate Change and the Environment. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA. Gurtin, M. E., & Murphy, L. F. (1981). On the optimal harvesting of age-structured populations: some simple models. Mathematical Bios