KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Business and Economics Research Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

The Regional Development Agency Experiences of Turkey and Romania

YILMAZ TOKTAŞ
Claudiu BOTOC
SERKAN KÜNÜ
Roxana PROZAN
Sayfa
253–270
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this study, we explain both countries’ RDA experiences within the organizationalstructures and the development of agencies following a theoretical approach.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Economic growth and development take priority in a country’s economic andsocial objectives.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Regional imbalances are a significant socio-economic problem that isapparent in many countries.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this study, we explain both countries’ RDA experiences within the organizationalstructures and the development of agencies following a theoretical approach.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Economic growth and development take priority in a country’s economic andsocial objectives. When examining historical periods, there are central points ineconomic and social activities for reasons such as geopolitical status and geographiccharacteristics. Regional imbalances are a significant socio-economic problem that isapparent in many countries. Development agencies implemented by many developed ordeveloping countries aim to eliminate regional imbalances. Turkey and Romania havedifferent regional development levels. However, both countries face the problem ofregional development differences. The EU Regional Policy, through the approach of aregional development agency, can help to close the gap between regions in bothcountries. The legislative framework of regional development was established byRegional Development Law No. 151 in 1998 after first carrying out an analysis of theregional disparities in Romania. RDAs entered the Turkish legal system with Law No.5449 concerning the establishment, coordination, and tasks of development agencies in2006. In this study, we explain both countries’ RDA experiences within the organizationalstructures and the development of agencies following a theoretical approach.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOKTAŞ, Y., BOTOC, C., KÜNÜ, S., PROZAN, R. (2018). The Regional Development Agency Experiences of Turkey and Romania. Business and Economics Research Journal, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 253–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/352153

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Antonescu, D. (2013). The regional development policy of Romania in the post-accession period. Working Papers of National Institute of Economic Research, Romanian Academy, No. 131209. Ansell, C. (2000). The networked polity: Regional development in Western Europe. Governance, An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(3), 303–333.
  2. Apan, A. (2004). Bölge kavramı ve bölgesel kalkınma ajansları. Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 13(4), 39–58.
  3. Assembly of European Regions. (2009). Part 1: Creating a decentralization index. In From subsidiarity to success: The impact of decentralization on economic growth (p.26) Retrieved March 26, 2015 from https://aer.eu/subsidiarity-success-impact-decentralisation-economic-growth/.
  4. Beer, A., & Maude, A. (2002). Local and regional economic development agencies in Austria, Report Prepared for the Local Government Association of South Australia (pp. 61–65).
  5. Flinders University, Australia. Cankorkmaz, Z. (2011). Regional development agencies in Turkey and critics of these agents. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 113–138.
  6. Çelik, O., Recepoğlu, M., & Doğan, K. C. (2014). The way analysis of human capital and foreign trade of regional development agency activities in Turkey. Global Journal of Economics and Business Studies, 3(6), 39–50.
  7. Dobre, A. M. (2010). Europeanization and new patterns of multi-level governance in Romania. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea, 10(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683851003606838.
  8. Eren, H., & Cidecigiller, A. (2011). Bölgesel kalkınma ajansları. İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi İlhan ÖZAY Armağanı, 391–410.
  9. Eryılmaz, B., & Tuncer, A. (2013). Regional development policies in the process of EU integration: Regional development agencies and application to Turkey. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 8(1), 165–189.
  10. Eurada. (1999). Creation, development and management of RDAs: Does it have to be so difficult? (pp. 16–17).
  11. Bruxelles. Eurostat. (2015). The EU statistics. Retrieved April 5, 2015 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat. Eurostat. (2013a). Regional Innovation Monitor Plus. Retrieved April 13, 2013 from https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools- databases/regional-innovation-monitor/. Eurostat. (2013b). The evolution of GDPPC in Romania. Retrieved March 26, 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat.
  12. Ghioltan, S. (2008). The relationship between the administrative region and regional policy. Transylvanian Magazine of Administrative S