Dergiler / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUALS' CREATIVITY PERFORMANCE: PATERNALIST LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP

BİREYLERİN YARATICI PERFORMANSINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER: BABACAN LİDERLİK, YÖNETİM İNOVASYONU VE PSİKOLOJİK SAHİPLENME

Sayfa
929–954
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, it is determined thatpaternalistic leadership does not have a significant impact on creativity performance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Paternalistic leadership, management innovation, psychological ownership andcreativity performance are the most important approaches for organisations to gain acompetitive advantage.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to examine the impact of paternalistic leadership,management innovation, and psychological ownership on creativity performance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, it is determined thatpaternalistic leadership does not have a significant impact on creativity performance.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Paternalistic leadership, management innovation, psychological ownership andcreativity performance are the most important approaches for organisations to gain acompetitive advantage. This study aims to examine the impact of paternalistic leadership,management innovation, and psychological ownership on creativity performance. Besides, itaimed to provide recommendations based on results regarding the impact of paternalisticleadership and management innovation on psychological ownership and creativityperformance. In this empirical study, the data on perceptions concerning paternalisticleadership, management innovation, psychological ownership, and creativity performancewere gathered using a questionnaire completed by 119 school vice-principals and 94 schoolprincipals, all employed in schools in Artvin, Turkey. The data were analysed with theSmartPLS software and presented in seven tables. The findings showed that managementinnovation and psychological ownership have a positive impact on creativity performance.The results also revealed that paternalistic leadership has a significant impact onmanagement innovation and psychological ownership. However, it is determined thatpaternalistic leadership does not have a significant impact on creativity performance.

Abstract

Babacan liderlik, yönetim inovasyonu, psikolojik sahiplenme ve yaratıcı performans örgütlerin rekabetçi avantaj kazanmaları için en önemli yaklaşımlardır. Bu çalışamnın amacı, babacan liderlik, yönetim inovasyonu ve psikolojik sahiplenmenin yaratıcı performans üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Ayrıca, babacan liderlik ve yönetim inovasyonunun, psikolojik sahiplenme ve yaratıcı performans üzerindeki etkisine ilişkin sonuçlara dayalı olarak önerilerde bulunmak da amaçlanmıştır. Bu ampirik çalışmada, babacan liderlik, yönetim inovasyonu, psikolojik sahiplenme ve yaratıcı performans algısına dair veriler Türkiye’de Artvin ilinde çalışan 119 okul müdür yardımcısı ve 94 müdüründen anket yoluyla toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler SmartPLS yazılımı ile analiz edilmiş ve tablolar halinde sunulmuştur. Bulgular, yönetim inovasyonu ve psikolojik sahiplenmenin yaratıcı performans üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu göstermiştir. Aynı zamanda babacan liderliğin yönetim inovasyonu ve psikolojik sahiplenme üzerinde olumlu etkisi olduğunu olduğunu ortaya çıkarmıştır. Ancak, babacan liderliğin yaratıcı performans üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi olmadığını göstermiştir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SÖZBİLİR, F. (2020). FACTORS AFFECTING INDIVIDUALS' CREATIVITY PERFORMANCE: PATERNALIST LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL OWNERSHIP. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 929–954. https://ajindex.com/articles/352043

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Amabile, T.M. (1988). A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organisations. Research in Organisational Behavior, 10, 123-167
  2. Ansari, M. A., Ahmad, Z. A., & Aafaqi, R. (2004). Organisational leadership in the Malaysian context. In D. Tjosvold & K. Leung (Eds.), Leading in high growth Asia: Managing relationship for teamwork and change (pp. 109-138). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Anwar, H. (2013). Impact of paternalistic leadership on employees' outcome a study on the banking sector of Pakistan. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 7(6), 109-115.
  3. Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. R., & Luthans, F. (2009). Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement, and relation to work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2), 173- 191. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.583
  4. Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1298-2.
  5. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards Conceptual Refinement and Operationalisation. In U. Kim, K.- S. Yang, & K.-K. Hwang (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (p. 445–466). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28662-4_20
  6. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., & Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 192-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00010
  7. Baryniene, J. & Dauknyte, B. (2015). Creativity as the main factor for organisations' success: Theoretical approach. European Integration Studies, 9, 235-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.9.12810
  8. Bernhard, F., & O'Driscoll, M. P. (2011). Psychological ownership in small family-owned businesses: Leadership style and nonfamily-employees' work attitudes and behaviors. Group and Organization Management, 36(3), 345-384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111402684
  9. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845. Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organisational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 67, 2891–2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
  10. Chang, S.C, Tein, S.W. & Lee, H.M. (2010). Soc