KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

Structural behavior of shear connectors embedded in different types of concrete

Adil Hadi WARDİ
Gokhan TUNC
Khalil IBRAHEEM
Sayfa
160–175
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The specimens with C-shaped studs made of high-strength steel with weldedstuds embedded in normal weight, high strength and reactive powder concretes, generated the maximum shear resistance values.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Push-out tests are used to determine shear connectors’ properties where two smallreinforced concrete walls are attached to the top and bottom flanges of an I-sectionthrough four shear studs located on both its flanges.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the structural behavior of shear connectors was examined by testing a total of 36 push-out specimens.In these specimens, various test parameters were used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The specimens with C-shaped studs made of high-strength steel with weldedstuds embedded in normal weight, high strength and reactive powder concretes, generated the maximum shear resistance values.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Push-out tests are used to determine shear connectors’ properties where two smallreinforced concrete walls are attached to the top and bottom flanges of an I-sectionthrough four shear studs located on both its flanges. In this study, the structural behavior of shear connectors was examined by testing a total of 36 push-out specimens.In these specimens, various test parameters were used. The types of shear connectors and their strengths, their connection types, and the strength of the concrete inwhich they were embedded were all investigated. Headed, L-shaped, and C-shapedstuds were selected in this experimental study to represent different types of shearconnectors. These shear connectors were assumed to be either ordinary or highstrength steel-embedded in three different types of concrete: ordinary, high strength,and reactive powder concretes. In these tests, the shear connectors were connectedthrough welding or epoxy bonding. The objective of this study was to investigate thestructural behaviors of these different types of shear connectors by focusing on theirshear force capacities and slip values. The test results indicate that the reactive powder concrete increased the mechanical properties of concrete as the concrete age increased. The specimens with C-shaped studs made of high-strength steel with weldedstuds embedded in normal weight, high strength and reactive powder concretes, generated the maximum shear resistance values.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

WARDİ, A. H., TUNC, G., IBRAHEEM, K. (2020). Structural behavior of shear connectors embedded in different types of concrete. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 160–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/351791

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Adekola AO (1968). Partial interaction between elastically connected elements of a composite beam. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 4(11), 1125-1135.
  2. Al-Shafi'i NTH (2013). Shear Behavior of Reactive Powder Concrete Tbeams. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Al-Mustansiriya, Baghdad, Iraq. Aziz KI (2005). Behavior of Multi-layer Composite Beams with Partial Interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq. Bae BI, Chung JH, Choi HK, Jung HS, Choi CS (2018). Experimental study on the cyclic behavior of steel fiber reinforced high strength concrete columns and evaluation of shear strength. Engineering Structures, 157, 250-267.
  3. Di J, Zou Y, Zhou X, Qin F, Peng X (2018). Push-out test of large perfobond connectors in steel–concrete joints of hybrid bridges. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 150, 415-429. EN 1994 - Eurocode 4 (1994). Design of composite steel and concrete structures. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium. Fallah S, Nematzadeh M (2017). Mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete containing macro-polymeric and polypropylene fibers with nano-silica and silica fume. Construction and Building Materials, 132, 170-187.
  4. He S, Fang Z, Mosallam AS (2017). Push-out tests for perfobond strip connectors with UHPC grout in the joints of steel-concrete hybrid bridge girders. Engineering Structures, 135, 177-190.
  5. Hirama C, Ishikawa T, Hisagi A (2017). Special Issue: Proceedings of Eurosteel 2017. In: Jönnsso J, editor. Shear strength of headed stud push‐out tests: comprehensive literature review focusing on slab type, failure mode, and large‐diameter headed stud. Wiley Online Library, 2013-2022.
  6. Hmeed YM (2014). Behavior of reinforced concrete I-beams containing reactive powder concrete. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Al-Mustansiriya, Baghdad, Iraq. Ismael MA (2013). Flexural Behavior of Reactive Powder Concrete Tee Beams. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Al-Mustansiriya, Baghdad, Iraq. Newmark, NM, Siess, CP, Viest IM (1951). Tests and analysis of composite beams with incomplete interaction. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Stress Analysis, 9(1), 75-92.
  7. Wandscher VF, Marchionatti AME, Otani A, Bergoli CD, Cesar PF, Valandro LF (2018). Effects of bonding area size, surface treatment and specimen configuration on the push out test for assessing bond