KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Evaluating the effects of different slab types on static and dynamic characteristics of structures

Yılmaz KELEŞ
Hüseyin KASAP
Zeynep YAMAN
Sayfa
71–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Seismic analysis and calculations of the buildings were completed using SAP2000 finite element software.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, the effect of different types of slabs on dynamic characteristics of structures under the lateral loading was investigated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, four different types of slabs namely, beamed slab, flat slab, one way ribbed (hollow core) slab andwaffle slab have been modeled in buildings having 3, 4 and 5 storeys with the same geometric dimensions, in accordance to design and construction requirements (TS 500) and Turkish building seismic codes (TBDY, 2018).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Seismic analysis and calculations of the buildings were completed using SAP2000 finite element software.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In this study, the effect of different types of slabs on dynamic characteristics of structures under the lateral loading was investigated. For this purpose, four different types of slabs namely, beamed slab, flat slab, one way ribbed (hollow core) slab andwaffle slab have been modeled in buildings having 3, 4 and 5 storeys with the same geometric dimensions, in accordance to design and construction requirements (TS 500) and Turkish building seismic codes (TBDY, 2018). Seismic analysis calculations of the modeled buildings were done using the equivalent seismic load method. The assumed local soil class was taken from the geotechnical report as ZD. As a result of the analysis, natural periods, base shear forces, maximum horizontal displacements and relative storey drifts of the buildings were compared. Seismic analysis and calculations of the buildings were completed using SAP2000 finite element software.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KELEŞ, Y., KASAP, H., YAMAN, Z. (2021). Evaluating the effects of different slab types on static and dynamic characteristics of structures. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 71–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/351785

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Afad (2019). T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı, Ankara, Turkey. https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/ Date of access: 12.05.2019.
  2. Ağcakoca E (2019). Yüksek katlı yapının sarsma tablası üzerinde deprem performansının incelenmesi. ALKÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3), 132-143. (in Turkish) Ağcakoca E, Yaman Z, Yazıcı YE (2018). Kompozit ve kutu profilin darbe kuvveti altındaki davranışı. Journal of New Results in Engineering and Natural Sciences, 8, 75-83. (in Turkish) Alfeehan A, Abdulkareem HI, Mutashar SH (2017). Flexural behavior of sustainable reactive powder concrete bubbled slab flooring elements. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 3(2), 81-89.
  3. Al Munifi AA, Alameri IA (2019). The impact of design approach and contracting practices on cost and execution period of school buildings. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 5(3), 85-95.
  4. Al-Safi S, Alameri IA, Badhib RA, Kuleib M (2020). Evaluation of performance-based earthquake engineering in Yemen. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 6(1), 10-22.
  5. Bansal A, Patidar A (2016). Pushover analysis of multistorey buildings having flat slab and grid slab. International Journal of Engineering Science Invention Research & Development, 2(7), 435-441.
  6. Bekdaş G, Nigdeli SM (2016). Optimum design of reinforced concrete columns employing teaching learning based optimization. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 2(4), 216-219.
  7. Bhina MR, Banerjee A, Paul DK (2013). Assessment of different aspect of RC flat slab building over normal RC frame building. International Conference on Structural Engineering & Construction Management (ICSECM,), Kandy, Sri Lanka. Bilgin H, Uruçi R, (2018). Effects of structural irregularities on low and mid-rise RC building response. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 4(2), 33-44.
  8. Caglar N, Elmas M, Yaman ZD, Saribiyik M (2008). Neural networks in 3-dimensional dynamic analysis of reinforced concrete buildings, Construction and Building Materials, 22(5), 788-800.
  9. Çağlarım M (2002). Betonarme Çok Katlı Yapılarda Döşeme Türünün Taşıyıcı Sisteme Etkileri. Ph.D thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish) Demirok A (2009). Perdeli Çerçeve Taşıyıcı Sisteme Sahip bir Betonarme Yapıda Farklı Döşeme Türlerinin Davranışa Etkisi. Ph,D thesis, İstanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish) Doğangün A (2018). Betonarme Yapıların Hesap ve Tasarımı. Birsen Yayınevi,
  10. İstanbul, Turkey. (in Turkish) El-Shaer MA (2013). Seismic l