KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Assessment of an old roadway bridge under static and seismic loading conditions

Mehmet Fatih YILMAZ
Abdulkadir Cüneyt AYDIN
Sayfa
107–116
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The performance of the bridge for varying truckloads and earthquake loads is investigated, and results are discussed in detail.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A large proportion of road and railway bridges, present in Turkey served for many years, have been completed their service life or will soon.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Continuing safety and sustainability of these bridges under traffic loads have been of great increasing importance to roadway and railway transportation line to be continuous servicing.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The performance of the bridge for varying truckloads and earthquake loads is investigated, and results are discussed in detail.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

A large proportion of road and railway bridges, present in Turkey served for many years, have been completed their service life or will soon. Continuing safety and sustainability of these bridges under traffic loads have been of great increasing importance to roadway and railway transportation line to be continuous servicing. In addition, the demolition and reconstruction of bridges that have reached the end of their service life or are nearing completion will have a negative impact on the country's economy. All of these requirements' detailed examination of bridges in order to provide economical and safe service, considering current vehicle loads and earthquake loads. The Mahmutçavuş Bridge is investigated as a simply supported continuous composite roadway bridge at this work. The finite-element model of the bridge is constituted by site investigation and measurement. Different truckloads using for the design of the bridge are determined, and static analysis of the bridge is conducted. Seven earthquake records are scaled for two different earthquake design spectrums. The nonlinear time-history analyses are conducted, considering Δ-δ effects. The performance of the bridge for varying truckloads and earthquake loads is investigated, and results are discussed in detail.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, M. F., AYDIN, A. C. (2021). Assessment of an old roadway bridge under static and seismic loading conditions. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 107–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/351783

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Atmaca B (2019). Determination of minimum depth of prestressed concrete I-Girder bridge for different design truck. Computers and Concrete, 24(4), 303–311.
  2. Bruneau M (1998). Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogoken – Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake — a North American perspective. Engineering Structures, 20(12), 1063–1078.
  3. Bruneau M, Wilson JC, Tremblay R (1996). Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(3), 678–713.
  4. Damci E, Temur R, Bekdaş G, Sayin B (2015). Damages and causes on the structures during the October 23, 2011 Van earthquake in Turkey. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 3, 112–131.
  5. DesRoches R, Choi E, Leon RT, Dyke SJ, Aschheim M (2004). Seismic response of multiple span steel bridges in central and southeastern United States. I: As built. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 9(5), 464– 472. Ghosh J, Padgett JE (2010). Aging considerations in the development of time-dependent seismic fragility curves. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136, No. December, 1497–1511.
  6. Inel M, Ozmen HB, Bilgin H (2008). Re-evaluation of building damage during recent earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Structures, 30(2), 412–427.
  7. Kawashima K (2012). Damage of bridges due to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering, 12(4), 319–338.
  8. Korkmaz HH, Korkmaz SZ, Donduren MS (2010). Earthquake hazard and damage on traditional rural structures in Turkey. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10(3), 605–622.
  9. Kunnath SK, Erduran A, Chai YH, Yashinsky M (2008). Effect of vertical motions on seismic response of highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 13(3), 282–290.
  10. Larsson T, Lagerqvist O (2009). Material properties of old steel bridges. Nordic Steel Construction Conference 2009 (NSCC2009), 120–127.
  11. Lu Z, Ge H, Usami T (2004). Applicability of pushover analysis-based seismic performance evaluation procedure for steel arch bridges. Engineering Structures, 26(13), 1957–1977.
  12. Nielson BG (2005). Analytical fragility curves for highway bridges in moderate seismic zones. Georgia Institute of Technology, No. December, 400. Nielson BG, DesRoches R (2007). Seismic performance assessment of simply supported and continuous multispan concrete girder highway bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 12(5), 611–620.
  13. Padgett JE, DesRoches R (2008). Three-dimensional nonlinear seismic performance evaluation of retrofit measures for typ