Dergiler / art / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Hypermobility Frequency in School Children: Relationship With Idiopathic Scoliosis, Age, Sex and Musculoskeletal Problems

Dergi
art
Sayfa
268–273
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

GJH should be consideredin adolescents with scoliosis, which may be an important aspect in treatment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to assess the prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in school children in relation to scoliosis and to identifymusculoskeletal problems.Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included 822 school children (413 males, 409 females; mean age 12.2±1.3 years; range, 10 and 15years).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The presence of GJH was assessed by the Beighton score (≥4 was considered jointhypermobility).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:GJH should be consideredin adolescents with scoliosis, which may be an important aspect in treatment.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to assess the prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in school children in relation to scoliosis and to identifymusculoskeletal problems.Patients and methods: This cross-sectional study included 822 school children (413 males, 409 females; mean age 12.2±1.3 years; range, 10 and 15years). Demographic characteristics of all children were recorded. The presence of GJH was assessed by the Beighton score (≥4 was considered jointhypermobility). Scoliosis screening consisted of forward bend test (FBT) and measurement of angle of trunk rotation (ATR). Positive FBT or ATR ≥5°was referred to a portable X-ray device. The presence of musculoskeletal complaints was determined by a questionnaire.Results: Children’s body mass index (BMI) was 19.6±4.1. GJH was diagnosed in 151 subjects (18.4%). No significant association was detected betweensex and hypermobility. Joint hypermobility was inversely correlated with age and BMI. Scoliosis was found in 43 subjects (5.2%) and all of themexcept one girl had mild scoliosis. The most common scoliosis pattern was a single left thoracolumbar curve. Seventy-three subjects (8.9%) hadCobb angle under 10°, with a potential for progression. Among subjects having GJH, the most common clinical finding was pes planus (34.3%) andthe most common clinical symptom was ankle sprain (31.3%).Conclusion: Similar to that found in children from many countries, GJH is a common clinical condition in Turkish children. GJH should be assessed inthe differential diagnosis of adolescents with musculoskeletal complaints for effective treatment and reducing morbidity. GJH should be consideredin adolescents with scoliosis, which may be an important aspect in treatment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZKURT, S., KAYALAR, G., TEZEL, N., GÜLER, T., KESİKBURUN, B., DENİZLİ, M., TAN, S., YILMAZ, H. G. (2019). Hypermobility Frequency in School Children: Relationship With Idiopathic Scoliosis, Age, Sex and Musculoskeletal Problems. art, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 268–273. https://ajindex.com/articles/351722

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Czaprowski D, Kotwicki T, Pawowska P, Stoliski L. Joint hypermobility in children with idiopathic scoliosis: SOSORT award 2011 winner. Scoliosis 2011;6:22
  2. Jansson A, Saartok T, Werner S, Renström P. General joint laxity in 1845 Swedish school children of different ages: age- and gender-specific distributions. Acta Paediatr 2004;93:1202-6
  3. Seçkin U, Tur BS, Yilmaz O, Ya¤ci I, Bodur H, Arasil T. The prevalence of joint hypermobility among high school students. Rheumatol Int 2005;25:260-3
  4. Yıldırım Y, Yılmaz S, Ayhan E, Saygı S, Yanaral F, Zubario¤lu UA, et al. The frequency of joint hypermobility ın healthy school children. Turk Pediatri Ars 2005;40:83-6
  5. Adib N, Davies K, Grahame R, Woo P, Murray KJ. Joint hypermobility syndrome in childhood. A not so benign multisystem disorder? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005;44:744-50
  6. Yaman O, Dalbayrak S. Idiopathic scoliosis. Turk Neurosurg 2014;24(Suppl 1):38-52
  7. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 2008;371:1527-37
  8. Jada A, Mackel CE, Hwang SW, Samdani AF, Stephen JH, Bennett JT et al. Evaluation and management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review. Neurosurg Focus 2017;43:1-9
  9. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 2013;7:3-9
  10. Beighton P, Grahame R, Bird H. Assesment of hypermobility. In: Beighton P, editor. Hypermobility of Joints. 3rd ed. London: Springer; 2002. p. 9-22
  11. Smits-Engelsman B, Klerks M, Kirby A. Beighton score: a valid measure for generalized hypermobility in children. J Pediatr 2011;158:119-23
  12. Hakim A, Grahame R. Joint hypermobility. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003;17:989-1004
  13. Rikken-Bultman DG, Wellink L, van Dongen PW. Hypermobility in two Dutch school populations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997;73:189- 92
  14. Clinch J, Deere K, Sayers A, Palmer S, Riddoch C, Tobias JH, et al. Epidemiology of generalized joint laxity (hypermobility) in fourteen-year-old children from the UK: a population-based evaluation. Arthritis Rheum 2011;63:2819-27
  15. Gocentas A, Jascaniniene N, Pasek M1, Przybylski W, Matulyte E, Mieliauskaite D, et al. Prevalence of generalised joint hypermobility in school-aged children from east-central European region. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2016;75:48-52
  16. Hasija RP, Khubchandani RP, Shenoi S. Joint hypermobility in Indian children. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2008;26:146-50
  17. Morris SL, O’Sullivan PB, Murr