KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / art / 2019 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Identification Pain Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain

ASLIHAN UZUNKULAOĞLU
Duygu KERİM
Saime AY
Süreyya ERGİN
Dergi
art
Sayfa
262–267
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Further,with an excellent value of 0.92 for area under the curve, a good diagnostic value was indicated.Conclusion: The Turkish version of ID pain questionnaire assessed in the present study is a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire toidentify NP in Turkish patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the identification (ID) pain (ID pain-T) questionnaire in Turkishpatients.Patients and methods: The Turkish version of ID pain questionnaire was obtained after translation from English into Turkish.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study included194 patients of which 100 (34 males, 66 females; mean age 59.8±14.3 years; range, 28 to 88 years) were diagnosed as neuropathic pain (NP) and94 (31 males, 63 females; mean age 47.2±16.5 years; range, 20 to 78 years) were diagnosed as non-neuropathic pain.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Further,with an excellent value of 0.92 for area under the curve, a good diagnostic value was indicated.Conclusion: The Turkish version of ID pain questionnaire assessed in the present study is a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire toidentify NP in Turkish patients.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the identification (ID) pain (ID pain-T) questionnaire in Turkishpatients.Patients and methods: The Turkish version of ID pain questionnaire was obtained after translation from English into Turkish. The study included194 patients of which 100 (34 males, 66 females; mean age 59.8±14.3 years; range, 28 to 88 years) were diagnosed as neuropathic pain (NP) and94 (31 males, 63 females; mean age 47.2±16.5 years; range, 20 to 78 years) were diagnosed as non-neuropathic pain. Patients with mixed-type pain,cancer pain, headaches, substance abuse, severe depression or fibromyalgia syndrome were excluded.Results: The reliability and consistency of ID pain-T questionnaire were acceptable, with a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.701. Statistical analysis ofthe ID pain-T questionnaire calculated an optimal cut-off score of ≥2 for determining NP with a sensitivity of 77.2% and a specificity of 85%. Further,with an excellent value of 0.92 for area under the curve, a good diagnostic value was indicated.Conclusion: The Turkish version of ID pain questionnaire assessed in the present study is a valid and reliable self-administered questionnaire toidentify NP in Turkish patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UZUNKULAOĞLU, A., KERİM, D., AY, S., ERGİN, S. (2019). Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of the Identification Pain Questionnaire in the Assessment of Neuropathic Pain. art, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, 262–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/351721

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Jensen TS, Baron R, Haanpää M, Kalso E, Loeser JD, Rice AS, et al. A new definition of neuropathic pain. Pain 2011;152:2204-5
  2. Dieleman JP, Kerklaan J, Huygen FJ, Bouma PA, Sturkenboom MC. Incidence rates and treatment of neuropathic pain conditions in the general population. Pain 2008;137:681-8
  3. IASP Task Force in Taxonomy. Pain terms: A current list with definitions and notes on usage. In: Merksey H, Bogduk N, editors. Classification of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. 2nd ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994. p. 206-13
  4. Treede RD, Jensen TS, Campbell JN, Cruccu G, Dostrovsky JO, Griffin JW, et al. Neuropathic pain: redefinition and a grading system for clinical and research purposes. Neurology 2008;70:1630-5
  5. Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, et al. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain 2005;114:29-36
  6. Hansson P. Neuropathic pain: clinical characteristics and diagnostic workup. Eur J Pain 2002;6:47-50
  7. Jensen TS, Gottrup H, Sindrup SH, Bach FW. The clinical picture of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol 2001;429:1-11
  8. Harden N, Cohen M. Unmet needs in the management of neuropathic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003;25:12-7
  9. Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Backonja M, Farrar JT, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, et al. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain 2007;132:237-51
  10. Finnerup NB, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. The evidence for pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain. Pain 2010;150:573-81
  11. Portenoy R. Development and testing of a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire: ID Pain. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:1555-65
  12. Gálvez R, Pardo A, Cerón JM, Villasante F, Aranguren JL, Saldaña MT, et al. Linguistic adaptation into Spanish and psychometric validation of the ID-Pain questionnaire for the screening of neuropathic pain. Med Clin (Barc) 2008;131:572-8
  13. Gudala K, Ghai B, Bansal D. Usefulness of four commonly used neuropathic pain screening questionnaires in patients with chronic low back pain: a cross-sectional study. Korean J Pain 2017;30:51-58
  14. Kitisomprayoonkul W. Validation study of the Thai ID Pain Scale. J Med Assoc Thai 2011;94:610-5
  15. Li J, Feng Y, Han J, Fan B, Wu D, Zhang D, et al. Linguistic adaptation, validation and comparison of 3 routinely used neuropathic pain questionnaires. Pain Physician 2012;15:179-86. 16.