Dergiler / Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni / 2021 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Does the Coraco-acromial Angle Contribute to the Diagnosis of Impingement Syndrome?

Korako-akromial Açının İmpingement Sendromu Tanısına Katkısı Var Mı?

Sayfa
99–104
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Elsewise, no correlation was found between impingement syndrome and coraco-acromial angle, since there were moderately negative correlations in terms of coraco-humeral and acromio-humeral distances.Conclusion: Unlike the coraco-humeral and acromio-humeral distances, there was no correlation between coraco-acromial angle and impingement syndrome.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate the contribution of the coraco-acromial angle to the diagnosis of impingement syndrome.Method: The magnetic resonance images of the shoulder of 159 patients (96 females, 63 males) with impingement syndrome and 201 control cases (113 females, 88 males) from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:On the sagittal plane T2-weighted images, the shortest distances of humeral head to the acromion and the coracoid process, and the angle between longitudinal axis of the coraco-acromial ligament and longitudinal axis of the acromion were measured.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Elsewise, no correlation was found between impingement syndrome and coraco-acromial angle, since there were moderately negative correlations in terms of coraco-humeral and acromio-humeral distances.Conclusion: Unlike the coraco-humeral and acromio-humeral distances, there was no correlation between coraco-acromial angle and impingement syndrome.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of the present study is to investigate the contribution of the coraco-acromial angle to the diagnosis of impingement syndrome.Method: The magnetic resonance images of the shoulder of 159 patients (96 females, 63 males) with impingement syndrome and 201 control cases (113 females, 88 males) from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. On the sagittal plane T2-weighted images, the shortest distances of humeral head to the acromion and the coracoid process, and the angle between longitudinal axis of the coraco-acromial ligament and longitudinal axis of the acromion were measured. To evaluate intraobserver reliability, all measurements were repeated two weeks later.Results: The mean values of coraco-humeral distance, acromio-humeral distance and coraco-acromial angle were 8.39±5.97 mm, 8.07±4.00 mm and 123.45±11.10°, respectively, in the patient group, and 10.32±2.52 mm, 10.69±2.19 mm and 124.75±6.95°, respectively, in the control group. While there was a significant difference between the patient and control groups in terms of coraco-humeral and acromio-humeral distances (p 0.05). Elsewise, no correlation was found between impingement syndrome and coraco-acromial angle, since there were moderately negative correlations in terms of coraco-humeral and acromio-humeral distances.Conclusion: Unlike the coraco-humeral and acromio-humeral distances, there was no correlation between coraco-acromial angle and impingement syndrome.

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı korako-akromial açının sıkışma sendromu tanısına katkısını araştırmaktır. Yöntem: 2017-2019 yılları arasında sıkışma sendromlu 159 hastanın (96 kadın, 63 erkek) ve 201 kontrol olgusunun (113 kadın, 88 erkek) omuz manyetik rezonans görüntüleri geriye dönük olarak değerlendirildi. Sagittal düzlem T2 ağırlıklı görüntülerde, humerus başı ile akromion ve korakoid proçesin en kısa mesafeleri ve korako-akromial ligamentin uzunlamasına ekseni ile akromionun uzunlamasına ekseni arasındaki açı (korako-akromial açı) ölçüldü. Gözlemci içi güvenilirliği değerlendirmek için, tüm ölçümler iki hafta sonra tekrarlandı. Bulgular: Ortalama korako-humeral mesafe, akromio-humeral mesafe ve korako-akromial açı değerleri hasta grubunda sırasıyla 8,39±5,97 mm, 8,07±4,00 mm ve 123,45±11,10° iken, kontrol grubunda 10,32±2,52 mm, 10,69±2,19 mm 124,75±6,95° idi. Hasta ve kontrol grubu arasında korakohumeral ve akromio-humeral mesafeler açısından anlamlı fark varken (p 0,05). Korako-humeral ve akromio-humeral mesafeler ile sıkışma sendromu arasında orta derecede negatif korelasyonlar mevcut iken korakoakromial açı ile sıkışma sendromu arasında bir ilişki saptanmadı. Sonuç: Korako-humeral ve akromio-humeral mesafelerden farklı olarak, korako-akromial açı ile sıkışma sendromu arasında bir ilişki saptanmadı.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERTEKİN, E., KASAR, Z. S. (2021). Does the Coraco-acromial Angle Contribute to the Diagnosis of Impingement Syndrome?. Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 99–104. https://ajindex.com/articles/351092

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Akgun K. Shoulder pain. In Desease of motion system, Tuzun F, Eryavuz M, Akairmak U (editors). Istanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstore, 1997:193-210
  2. Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972;54(1):41-50
  3. Neer CS 2nd. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;(173):70-77
  4. Özsoy MH, Fakıoğlu O, Aydoğan NH. Subacromial impingement syndrome. TOTBİD J 2013;12(4):340-352
  5. Poppen NK, Walker PS. Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;(135):165-170
  6. Akman S, Küçükkaya M. Subacromial impingement syndrome: pathogenesis, clinical features, and examination methods. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2003;37(Suppl 1):27-34
  7. Ekin A, Tatari H, Kabaklıoğlu T. Omuz impingiment sendromu: Anatomi, etiyoloji, sınıflama ve tedavi. Turkish J Arthroplasty Arthroscopic Surg 1994;5(8):19-25
  8. Finnan RP, Crosby LA. Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19(4):609-616
  9. Bigliani LU, Morrison DS, April EW. The morphology of the acromion and its relationship to rotator cuff tears. Orthop Trans 1986;10:228. 10. de Oliveira França F, Godinho AC, Ribeiro EJ, Falster L, Búrigo LE, Nunes RB. Evaluation of the acromiohumeral distance by means of magnetic resonance imaging umerus. Rev Bras Ortop 2016;51(2):169-174
  10. Asal N, Şahan MH. Radiological Variabilities in Subcoracoid Impingement: Coracoid Morphology, Coracohumeral Distance, Coracoglenoid Angle, and Coracohumeral Angle. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:8678-8684
  11. Park HJ, Lee SY, Choi YJ, Park JH, Kim E. Association between subacromial impingement and acromiohumeral distance on MRI. Iran J Radiol 2018;15(2):e13811
  12. Cay N, Tosun O, Doğan M, Karaoğlanoğlu M, Bozkurt M. The effect of morphometric relationship between the glenoid fossa and the humeral head on rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2012;46(5):325-331
  13. Giaroli EL, Major NM, Lemley DE, Lee J. Coracohumeral interval imaging in subcoracoid impingement syndrome on MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186(1):242-246
  14. Cay N, Tosun O, Işık C, Unal O, Kartal MG. Bozkurt M. Is coracoacromial arch angle a predisposing factor for rotator cuff tears? Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20(6):498-502
  15. Mc Ginley JC, Agrawal S, Biswal S. Rotator cuff tears: association with acromion angulation on MRI. Clin Imaging 2012;36(6):791- 796
  16. Duymuş M, Asal N, Bozkurt A, Güneş Orman G, Yeşilkaya Y, Yılmaz Ö. Acromio