Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

MRI-directed cognitive fusion-guided biopsy of the anterior prostate tumors

Sayfa
87–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Overall PIRADS score was an independent predictor of all prostate cancer diagnosis and of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis.CONCLUSIONTargeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy with MRI-directed cognitive fusion enables accu-rate sampling and may improve tumor detection yield of anterior prostate cancer.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed cognitive fu-sion transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided anterior prostate biopsy for diagnosis of anteri-or prostate tumors and to illustrate this technique.METHODSA total of 39 patients with previous negative TRUS biopsy, but high clinical suspicion of occult prostate cancer, prospectively underwent prostate MRI including diffusion-weighted imag-ing (DWI).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:PIRADS version 1 scores (T2, DWI, and overall), lesion size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and prostate gland volume were compared between positive and negative biopsy groups and between clinically significant cancer and remaining cases.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Overall PIRADS score was an independent predictor of all prostate cancer diagnosis and of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis.CONCLUSIONTargeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy with MRI-directed cognitive fusion enables accu-rate sampling and may improve tumor detection yield of anterior prostate cancer.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed cognitive fu-sion transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided anterior prostate biopsy for diagnosis of anteri-or prostate tumors and to illustrate this technique.METHODSA total of 39 patients with previous negative TRUS biopsy, but high clinical suspicion of occult prostate cancer, prospectively underwent prostate MRI including diffusion-weighted imag-ing (DWI). Patients with a suspicious anterior lesion on MRI underwent targeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy with cognitive fusion technique using sagittal probe orientation. PIRADS version 1 scores (T2, DWI, and overall), lesion size, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and prostate gland volume were compared between positive and negative biopsy groups and between clinically significant cancer and remaining cases. Logistic regression analysis of imaging parameters and prostate cancer diagnosis was performed.RESULTSAnterior gland prostate adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 18 patients (46.2%) on targeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy. Clinically significant prostate cancer was diagnosed in 13 patients (33.3%). MRI lesion size, T2, DWI, and overall PIRADS scores were significantly higher in patients with positive targeted biopsies and those with clinically significant cancer (P < 0.05). Biopsies were positive in 90%, 33%, and 29% of patients with overall PIRADS scores of 5, 4, and 3 respectively. Overall PIRADS score was an independent predictor of all prostate cancer diagnosis and of clinically significant prostate cancer diagnosis.CONCLUSIONTargeted anterior gland TRUS-guided biopsy with MRI-directed cognitive fusion enables accu-rate sampling and may improve tumor detection yield of anterior prostate cancer.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MURPHY, I. G., NİMHURCHU, E., GİBNEY, R. G., MCMAHON, C. J. (2017). MRI-directed cognitive fusion-guided biopsy of the anterior prostate tumors. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 87–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/350103

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Roehl KA, Antenor JAV, Catalona WJ. Serial bi- opsy results in prostate cancer screening study. J Urol 2002
  2. [Crossref] Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on bi- opsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol 2001
  3. [Crossref] Al-Ahmadie HA, Tickoo SK, Olgac S, et al. Anteri- or-predominant prostatic tumors: zone of origin and pathologic outcomes at radical prostatecto- my. Am J Surg Pathol 2008
  4. [Crossref] Bott SRJ, Young MPA, Kellett MJ, Parkinson MC, Contributors to the UCL Hospitals' Trust Radi- cal Prostatectomy Database. Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose? BJU In- ternational 2002
  5. [Crossref] Lawrentschuk N, Haider MA, Daljeet N, et al. "Prostatic evasive anterior tumours": the role of magnetic resonance imaging. BJU Int 2010
  6. [Crossref] Hoeks CMA, Barentsz JO, Hambrock T, et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiol- ogy 2011
  7. [Crossref] Bloch BN, Furman-Haran E, Helbich TH, et al. Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-res- olution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging--initial results 1. Ra- diology 2007
  8. [Crossref] Graser A, Heuck A, Sommer B, et al. Per-sextant localization and staging of prostate cancer: correlation of imaging findings with whole- mount step section histopathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007
  9. [Crossref] Prando A, Kurhanewicz J, Borges AP, Oliveira EM Jr, Figueiredo E. Prostatic biopsy directed with en- dorectal MR spectroscopic imaging findings in pa- tients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels and prior negative biopsy findings: early experi- ence 1. Radiology 2005
  10. [Crossref] Franiel T, Stephan C, Erbersdobler A, et al. Areas suspicious for prostate cancer: MR-guided biopsy in patients with at least one transrectal US-guided biopsy with a negative finding--multiparametric MR imaging for detection and biopsy planning. Radiology 2011
  11. [Crossref] Sciarra A, Panebianco V, Ciccariello M, et al. Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biop- sy. Clin Cancer Res 2010
  12. [Crossref] Park BK, Lee HM, Kim CK, Choi HY, Park JW. Lesion localization in patients with a previous negative transrect