Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 6

Breast diseases in children: the spectrum of radiologic findings in a cohort study

Sayfa
407–413
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our study confirms the substantial absence of malignancies in children as well as a widely different disease spectrum in comparison with the adult population.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the spectrum of radiologic findings and referral reasons for breast diseases in children considering age-appropriate presentation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS Our retrospective cohort study included 348 consecutive pediatric patients aged 15 years).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our study confirms the substantial absence of malignancies in children as well as a widely different disease spectrum in comparison with the adult population.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

PURPOSE We aimed to investigate the spectrum of radiologic findings and referral reasons for breast diseases in children considering age-appropriate presentation. METHODS Our retrospective cohort study included 348 consecutive pediatric patients aged 15 years). RESULTS Of 348 patients, 257 had a referral reason. The most frequent referral reason was a palpable mass (35%). Developmental abnormalities accounted for 48% of all radiologic findings in 348 patients. We did not detect any breast malignancy. According to age groups, the most common radiologic findings were neonatal hypertrophy (0–2 years), early breast development (2–8 years), developmental abnormalities by a majority of gynecomastia (8–15 years), and normal findings or developmental abnormalities (>15 years). Interestingly, the frequency of gynecomastia was only 4% in neonatal period or early childhood. Fibroadenomas and fibroadenoma-like solid masses were seen after 8 years and constituted the majority of solid masses (65%). Cysts were seen at a rate of 7% and majority of them were of simple type, which tends to resolve in time. CONCLUSION In our study, the most common referral reason to radiology was a palpable breast mass. Neonatal hypertrophy and early breast development in younger children, and developmental abnormalities in older children may be kept in mind as the most common radiologic findings. Our study confirms the substantial absence of malignancies in children as well as a widely different disease spectrum in comparison with the adult population.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURMAZ, E., ÖZTEK, M. A., HABİBİ, H. A., KESİMAL, U., SİNDEL, H. T. (2017). Breast diseases in children: the spectrum of radiologic findings in a cohort study. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 6, 407–413. https://ajindex.com/articles/350037

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Kaneda HJ, Mack J, Kasales CJ, Schetter S. Pe- diatric and adolescent breast masses: a re- view of pathophysiology, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200:W204–W212. [CrossRef] Chung EM, Cube R, Hall GJ, González C, Stocker JT, Glassman LM. From the archives of the AFIP: breast masses in children and adolescents: ra- diologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2009; 29:907–931. [CrossRef] Gao Y, Saksena MA, Brachtel EF, terMeulen DC, Rafferty EA. How to approach breast lesions in children and adolescents. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84:1350–1364. [CrossRef] Foxcroft LM, Evans EB, Hirst C, Hicks BJ. Presen- tation and diagnosis of adolescent breast dis- ease. Breast 2001; 10:399–401. [CrossRef] Garcia CJ, Espinoza A, Dinamarca V, et al. Breast US in children and adolescents. Radiographics 2000; 20:1605–1612. [CrossRef] Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Orel SG, Zuckerman JA, Bellah R. Spectrum of US findings in pediatric and adolescent patients with palpable breast masses. Radiographics 2000; 20:1613–1621. [CrossRef] Harth S, Behrens C, Roller FC, Alzen GF, Kro- mbach GA. Breast ultrasonography: findings in pediatric patients. Ultraschall Med 2017; 38:500-507.
  2. Sanchez R, Ladino-Torres MF, Bernat JA, Joe A, DiPietro MA. Breast fibroadenomas in pe- diatric population: common and uncommon sonographic findings. Pediatr Radiol 2010; 40:1681–1689. [CrossRef] Kaplowitz PB, Overfield SE. Drug and Thera- peutics and Executive Committee of the Law- son Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society. Reex- amination of the age limit for defining when puberty is precocious in girls in the United States: implications for evaluation and treat- ment. Pediatrics 1999; 104:936–941. [CrossRef] Vade A, Lafita VS, Ward KA, Lim-Dunham JE, Bova D. Role of breast sonography in imaging of adolescents with palpable solid breast mass- es. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 191:659–663. [CrossRef] Kamal M, Evans AJ, Denley H, Pinder SE, Ellis IO. Fibroadenomatoid hyperplasia: a cause of sus- picious microcalcification on mammograph- ic screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 171:1331-1334. [CrossRef] Graf O, Helbich TH, Hopf G, Sickles EA. Proba- bly benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy? Radiology 2007; 244:87–93. [CrossRef] Alimoglu E, Alimoglu MK, Çeken K, et al. BI- RADS category 3 nonpalpable breast masses on sonography: Long-term results of a pro- spective cohort study. J Clin Ultrasound 2012; 40:125–134. [CrossRef] Mainero BM, Goldkamp A, Lazarus E,