Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Is gynecomastia related to the disease characteristics and prognosis in testicular germ cell tumor patients?

Sayfa
189–194
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

No significant association was found between the disease prognosis and gynecomastia(P = 0.556).CONCLUSIONGynecomastia was common among testicular germ cell cancer patients with elevated β-hCG.However, it was not associated with metastatic disease and prognosis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSEWe aimed to assess the relationship between gynecomastia and tumor markers, histologic subtypes, and prognosis in patients with testicular germ cell tumors.METHODSThis study included 73 testicular germ cell cancer patients with pretreatment chest, abdomenand pelvis computed tomography (CT) scans and tumor markers (β-human chorionic gonadotropin [β-hCG], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], α-fetoprotein [AFP]).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The association between gynecomastia,breast glandular tissue volume, tumor markers, metastatic disease, and disease prognosis wereevaluated.RESULTSThirty-four of the patients (46.6%) had gynecomastia.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:No significant association was found between the disease prognosis and gynecomastia(P = 0.556).CONCLUSIONGynecomastia was common among testicular germ cell cancer patients with elevated β-hCG.However, it was not associated with metastatic disease and prognosis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSEWe aimed to assess the relationship between gynecomastia and tumor markers, histologic subtypes, and prognosis in patients with testicular germ cell tumors.METHODSThis study included 73 testicular germ cell cancer patients with pretreatment chest, abdomenand pelvis computed tomography (CT) scans and tumor markers (β-human chorionic gonadotropin [β-hCG], lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], α-fetoprotein [AFP]). The volumetric analysis ofthe breast glandular tissue, the presence of gynecomastia and metastatic disease were determined using CT scans. Patients were classified according to the International Germ Cell CancerCollaborative Group (IGCCCG) prognostic classification. The association between gynecomastia,breast glandular tissue volume, tumor markers, metastatic disease, and disease prognosis wereevaluated.RESULTSThirty-four of the patients (46.6%) had gynecomastia. A breast volume cutoff value of 0.78 cm3to diagnose gynecomastia led to 85% sensitivity and 95% specificity. Serum β-hCG level correlated with the breast glandular tissue volume weakly (r=0.242, P = 0.039). Gynecomastia wasmore common in patients with elevated β-hCG levels (P = 0.047), and was not associated withpulmonary, nonpulmonary distant, or nodal metastases (P = 0.378, P = 0.884, P = 0.333, respectively). No significant association was found between the disease prognosis and gynecomastia(P = 0.556).CONCLUSIONGynecomastia was common among testicular germ cell cancer patients with elevated β-hCG.However, it was not associated with metastatic disease and prognosis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

POLAT, A. V., ÖZTÜRK, M., ÇAMLIDAĞ, İ., AKYÜZ, B. (2019). Is gynecomastia related to the disease characteristics and prognosis in testicular germ cell tumor patients?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 189–194. https://ajindex.com/articles/350010

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Braunstein GD. Gynecomastia. N Engl J Med 1993; 328:490–495. [CrossRef] 2. Cuhaci N, Polat SB, Evranos B, Ersoy R, Cakir B. Gynecomastia: clinical evaluation and management. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2014; 18:150–158. [CrossRef] 3. Hassan HC, Cullen IM, Casey RG, Rogers E. Gynaecomastia: an endocrine manifestation of testicular cancer. Andrologia 2008; 40:152– 157. [CrossRef] 4. Tseng A, Horning SJ, Freiha FS, Resser KJ, Hannigan JR JF, Torti FM. Gynecomastia in testicular cancer patients prognostic and therapeutic implications. Cancer 1985; 56:2534–2538. 5. Kaptanis S, Parvanta L, Beltran L. Testicular seminoma presenting as unilateral gynecomastia. Breast J 2014; 20:424–426. [CrossRef] 6. Kolitsas N, Tsambalas S, Dimitriadis F, et al. Gynecomastia as a first clinical sign of nonseminomatous germ cell tumor. Urol Int 2011; 87:248–250. [CrossRef] 7. Harris M, Rizvi S, Hindmarsh J, Bryan R. Testicular tumour presenting as gynaecomastia. BMJ 2006; 332:837. [CrossRef] 8. Daniels IR, Layer GT. Testicular tumours presenting as gynaecomastia. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003; 29:437–439. [CrossRef] 9. Ismail AA, Barth JH. Endocrinology of gynaecomastia. Ann Clin Biochem 2001; 38:596–607. [CrossRef] 10. Hernes EH, Harstad K, Fossa SD. Changing incidence and delay of testicular cancer in southern Norway (1981–1992). Eur Urol 1996; 30:349–357. [CrossRef] 11. Stepanaz AV, Samaan NA, Schultz PN, Holoye PY. Endocrine studies in testicular tumour patients with and without gynaecomastia: a report of 45 cases. Cancer 1978; 41:369–376. [CrossRef] 12. Klang E, Rozendorn N, Raskin S, et al. CT measurement of breast glandular tissue and its association with testicular cancer. Eur Radiol 2017; 27:536–542. [CrossRef] 13. Laguna MP, Pizzocaro G, Klepp O, Algaba F, Kisbenedek L, Leiva O. EAU guidelines on testicular cancer. Eur Urol 2001; 40:102–110. [CrossRef] 14. Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, et al. Guidelines on testicular cancer. Eur Urol 2005; 48:885–894. [CrossRef] 15. Stevenson SM, Lowrance WT. Epidemiology and diagnosis of testis cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2015; 42:269–275. [CrossRef] 16. Wilkinson PM, Read G. International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15:594–603. [CrossRef] 17. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology 2015; 277