Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5

Comparison of low-dose CT with CT/CT fluoroscopy guidance in percutaneous sacral and supra-acetabular cementoplasty

Sayfa
353–359
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was a significant decrease in pain scores compared withbaseline on the visual analogue scale in both groups at 1 week (low-dose CT P = 0.002, CT/CTfluoroscopy P = 0.008) and 1 month postprocedure (low-dose CT P = 0.014, CT/CT fluoroscopyP = 0.004), but no difference between groups at 1 day (P = 0.196), 1 week (P = 0.368), or 1 month(P = 0.514).CONCLUSIONSacral and supra-acetabular cementoplasties can be performed safely and precisely using lowdose multiple-acquisition CT guidance while providing significant radiation dose reduction withno difference in extravasation rates, postprocedural pain reduction, and complications compared with CT/CT fluoroscopy.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSEPercutaneous cementoplasty is a minimally invasive treatment modality for painful osteoporoticand pathologic sacral and supra-acetabular iliac fractures.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Parameters evaluated included type of fracture, laterality of lesions, painscores, pain medication use, imaging parameters, procedure time, dose-length product, effective dose, cement volume, and complications.RESULTSThere were 17 patients identified who underwent cementoplasty utilizing dual CT/CT fluoroscopy, while 13 patients had their procedures performed with low-dose CT.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was a significant decrease in pain scores compared withbaseline on the visual analogue scale in both groups at 1 week (low-dose CT P = 0.002, CT/CTfluoroscopy P = 0.008) and 1 month postprocedure (low-dose CT P = 0.014, CT/CT fluoroscopyP = 0.004), but no difference between groups at 1 day (P = 0.196), 1 week (P = 0.368), or 1 month(P = 0.514).CONCLUSIONSacral and supra-acetabular cementoplasties can be performed safely and precisely using lowdose multiple-acquisition CT guidance while providing significant radiation dose reduction withno difference in extravasation rates, postprocedural pain reduction, and complications compared with CT/CT fluoroscopy.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSEPercutaneous cementoplasty is a minimally invasive treatment modality for painful osteoporoticand pathologic sacral and supra-acetabular iliac fractures. This study compares the use of lowdose CT guidance with CT/CT fluoroscopy in sacral and supra-acetabular cementoplasty.METHODSA retrospective review of patients who had undergone sacral or supra-acetabular cementoplastywas performed with patients grouped by use of CT/CT fluoroscopy or low-dose CT guidanceduring the procedure. Parameters evaluated included type of fracture, laterality of lesions, painscores, pain medication use, imaging parameters, procedure time, dose-length product, effective dose, cement volume, and complications.RESULTSThere were 17 patients identified who underwent cementoplasty utilizing dual CT/CT fluoroscopy, while 13 patients had their procedures performed with low-dose CT. There was a statisticallysignificant decrease in radiation dose in the low-dose CT group (1481 mGy·cm) compared withthe CT/CT fluoroscopy group (2809 mGy·cm) (P = 0.013). There was a significant decrease in procedure time with low-dose CT for bilateral lesions (P = 0.016). There was no significant differencebetween groups in complication rate (P = 0.999). Clinically nonsignificant cement extravasationoccurred in two patients (10%) in the CT/CT fluoroscopy group and in one patient (8%) in thelow-dose CT group (P = 0.999). There was a significant decrease in pain scores compared withbaseline on the visual analogue scale in both groups at 1 week (low-dose CT P = 0.002, CT/CTfluoroscopy P = 0.008) and 1 month postprocedure (low-dose CT P = 0.014, CT/CT fluoroscopyP = 0.004), but no difference between groups at 1 day (P = 0.196), 1 week (P = 0.368), or 1 month(P = 0.514).CONCLUSIONSacral and supra-acetabular cementoplasties can be performed safely and precisely using lowdose multiple-acquisition CT guidance while providing significant radiation dose reduction withno difference in extravasation rates, postprocedural pain reduction, and complications compared with CT/CT fluoroscopy.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SHAH, V., HILLEN, T., JENNINGS, J. (2019). Comparison of low-dose CT with CT/CT fluoroscopy guidance in percutaneous sacral and supra-acetabular cementoplasty. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5, 353–359. https://ajindex.com/articles/349997

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Dasgupta B, Shah N, Brown H, Gordon TE, Tanqueray AB, Mellor JA. Sacral insufficiency fractures: an unsuspected cause of low back pain. Br J Rheumatol 1998
  2. 789–793. [CrossRef] 2. Thomas EN, Cyteval C, Herisson C, Leonard L, Blotman F. Osteoporotic fracture of the sacrum: sacroplasty and physical medecine. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009
  3. 427–435. [CrossRef] 3. Wallace AN, Tomasian A, Vaswani D, Vyhmeister R, Chang RO, Jennings JW. Radiographic local control of spinal metastases with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and vertebral augmentation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016
  4. 759–765. [CrossRef] 4. Garant M. Sacroplasty: a new treatment for sacral insufficiency fracture. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002
  5. 1265–1267. [CrossRef] 5. Butler CL, Given CA, 2nd, Michel SJ, Tibbs PA. Percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005
  6. 1956–1959. [CrossRef] 6. Kortman K, Ortiz O, Miller T, et al. Multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of sacroplasty in patients with osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures or pathologic sacral lesions. J Neurointerv Surg 2013
  7. 461–466. [CrossRef] 7. Frey ME, DePalma MJ, Cifu DX, Bhagia SM, Daitch JS. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous sacroplasty for painful osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007
  8. 1635–1640. [CrossRef] 8. Kamel EM, Binaghi S, Guntern D, Mouhsine E, Schnyder P, Theumann N. Outcome of long-axis percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. Eur Radiol 2009
  9. 3002–3007. [CrossRef] 9. Katsanos K, Sabharwal T, Adam A. Percutaneous cementoplasty. Semin Intervent Radiol 2010
  10. 137–147. [CrossRef] 10. Gupta AC, Yoo AJ, Stone J, et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty. J Neurointerv Surg 2012
  11. 385– 389. [CrossRef] 11. Cannavale A, Salvatori FM, Wlderk A, Cirelli C, d'Adamo A, Fanelli F. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with the rotational fluoroscopy imaging technique. Skeletal Radiol 2014
  12. 1529–1536. [CrossRef] 12. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF. Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 2000
  13. 180–184. [CrossRef] 13. Silverman SG, Tuncali K, Adams DF, Nawfel RD, Zou KH, Judy PF. CT fluoroscopy-guided abdominal interventions: techniques, results, and radiation exposure. Radiology 1999
  14. 673– 681. [CrossRef] 14. Kang SE, Lee JW, Kim JH, Park KW, Yeom JS, Kang HS.