Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Strategy and management of severe hemorrhage complicating pancreatitis and post-pancreatectomy

Sayfa
81–89
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In total, 25 patients (62.5%) were alive at the 90-day follow-up.CONCLUSIONEndovascular management is effective for achieving hemostasis in severe pancreatic hemor-rhage with a high success rate and low recurrence, and laparotomy is not suitable for rebleeding cases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSE Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is increasingly used as the first-line treatment for hem-orrhage complicating pancreatitis and post-pancreatectomy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:However, the optimal therapeutic strategy remains unclear.METHODSAmong 1924 consecutive patients, 40 patients with severe pancreatic hemorrhage in Xuanwu Hospital were enrolled between 2005 and 2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In total, 25 patients (62.5%) were alive at the 90-day follow-up.CONCLUSIONEndovascular management is effective for achieving hemostasis in severe pancreatic hemor-rhage with a high success rate and low recurrence, and laparotomy is not suitable for rebleeding cases.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSE Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) is increasingly used as the first-line treatment for hem-orrhage complicating pancreatitis and post-pancreatectomy. However, the optimal therapeutic strategy remains unclear.METHODSAmong 1924 consecutive patients, 40 patients with severe pancreatic hemorrhage in Xuanwu Hospital were enrolled between 2005 and 2017. Patients underwent angiography and direct TAE for primary diagnosis and treatment of bleeding. Repeat TAE, watch and wait, and laparotomy were used as the other therapeutic options. Patient data, technical success, and 90-day survival were identified.RESULTSPancreatic diseases underlying hemorrhage included acute pancreatitis (n=19, 47.5%), chronic pancreatitis (n=12, 30%), and pancreatic cancer (n=9, 22.5%). A history of percutaneous catheter drainage or pancreatic surgery was seen in 29 patients (72.5%). There were 48 angiographies, 31 embolizations, and 5 laparotomies performed. Rebleeding occurred in 8 patients (20%); 4 of whom underwent re-embolization, 3 had laparotomy, and 1 had conservative treatment. Suc-cessful clinical hemostasis was achieved in 37 patients. Complications were observed in only 2 patients with renal failure and 1 patient with hepatic insufficiency. In total, 25 patients (62.5%) were alive at the 90-day follow-up.CONCLUSIONEndovascular management is effective for achieving hemostasis in severe pancreatic hemor-rhage with a high success rate and low recurrence, and laparotomy is not suitable for rebleeding cases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZHANG, C., Lİ, A., LUO, T., Lİ, J., LİU, D., CAO, F., Lİ, J., Lİ, F. (2019). Strategy and management of severe hemorrhage complicating pancreatitis and post-pancreatectomy. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 81–89. https://ajindex.com/articles/349993

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Carr JA, Cho JS, Shepard AD, Nypaver TJ, Reddy DJ. Visceral pseudoaneurysms due to pancre-atic pseudocysts: rare but lethal complications of pancreatitis. J Vasc Surg 2000
  2. 722–730. [CrossRef ] 2. Balachandra S, Siriwardena AK. Systematic ap-praisal of the management of the major vas-cular complications of pancreatitis. Am J Surg 2005
  3. 489–495. [CrossRef ] 3. Limongelli P, Khorsandi SE, Pai M, et al. Manage-ment of delayed postoperative hemorrhage af-ter pancreatico-duodenectomy: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2008
  4. 1001–1007. [CrossRef ] 4. Miura F, Asano T, Amano H, et al. Management of postoperative arterial hemorrhage after pancreato-biliary surgery according to the site of bleeding: re-laparotomy or interventional radiology. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2009
  5. 56–63. [CrossRef ] 5. Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, et al. Postpancre-atectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) defi-nition. Surgery 2007
  6. 20–25. [CrossRef ] 6. Cardella JF, Kundu S, Miller DL, Millward SF, Sacks D. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2009
  7. S189–191. [CrossRef ] 7. Izaki K, Yamaguchi M, Kawasaki R, Okada T, Sugimura K, Sugimoto K. N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization for pseudoaneurysms complicat-ing pancreatitis or pancreatectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011
  8. 302–308. [CrossRef ] 8. Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, et al. Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment: an analysis in 1669 consecutive pancreatic resections. Ann Surg 2007
  9. 269–280.[CrossRef ] 9. Flati G, Andren-Sandberg A, La Pinta M, Po-rowska B, Carboni M. Potentially fatal bleeding in acute pancreatitis: pathophysiology, preven-tion, and treatment. Pancreas 2003
  10. 8–14. [CrossRef ] 10. Sanjay P, Kellner M, Tait IS. The role of interven-tional radiology in the management of surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2012
  11. 812–817.[CrossRef ] 11. Pottier E, Ronot M, Gaujoux S, et al. Endovascu-lar management of delayed post-pancreatec-tomy haemorrhage. Eur Radiol 2016
  12. 3456–3465. [CrossRef ] 12. Li A, Cao F, Li J, et al. Step-up mini-invasive sur-gery for infected pancreatic necrosis: Results from prospective cohort study. Pancreatology 2016
  13. 508–514. [CrossRef ] 13. Barge JU, Lopera JE. Vascular complications of pancreatitis: role of interventional therapy. Ko-rean J Radiol 2012
  14. S45–55. [CrossRef ] 14. Nykanen T, Udd M, Peltola EK, Leppaniemi A,