Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Role of percutaneous radiological treatment in biliary complications associated with adult left lobe living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience

Sayfa
546–552
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In 3 patients whohad leakage and anastomosis stricture, balloon dilatation was applied for stricture; after dilatation, an IEBD catheter was placed through the leakage region in 2 patients, while a coveredmetallic stent passing through the leakage region was placed in one patient.CONCLUSIONGenerally, ERCP is the first preferred method in biliary complications of LDLT; however, incases where a response cannot be obtained by endoscopic treatment or require complexand/or aggressive treatment, percutaneous radiological treatment should be the treatmentof choice before surgery in left lobe LDLT.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSEBiliary complications develop at a higher rate in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared with cadaveric liver transplantation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim of this study was to determine the frequency ofbiliary complications developing after adult left lobe LDLT and to evaluate the efficacy of the algorithm followed in diagnosis and treatment, particularly percutaneous radiological treatment.METHODSA total of 2185 LDLT operations performed in our center between May 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and patients receiving left lobe LDLT were analyzedregarding biliary complications and treatments.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In 3 patients whohad leakage and anastomosis stricture, balloon dilatation was applied for stricture; after dilatation, an IEBD catheter was placed through the leakage region in 2 patients, while a coveredmetallic stent passing through the leakage region was placed in one patient.CONCLUSIONGenerally, ERCP is the first preferred method in biliary complications of LDLT; however, incases where a response cannot be obtained by endoscopic treatment or require complexand/or aggressive treatment, percutaneous radiological treatment should be the treatmentof choice before surgery in left lobe LDLT.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSEBiliary complications develop at a higher rate in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) compared with cadaveric liver transplantation. Almost all studies about biliary complications afterLDLT were made with the right lobe. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency ofbiliary complications developing after adult left lobe LDLT and to evaluate the efficacy of the algorithm followed in diagnosis and treatment, particularly percutaneous radiological treatment.METHODSA total of 2185 LDLT operations performed in our center between May 2009 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and patients receiving left lobe LDLT were analyzedregarding biliary complications and treatments. Biliary complications were treated via percutaneous drainage under ultrasound (US) guidance, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC)/ percutaneoustranshepatic biliary drainage (PTBD). Patient demographics, ERCP procedures before percutaneous treatment, and percutaneous treatment indications were analyzed.RESULTSA total of 69 adult patients received left lobe LDLT. Biliary complications requiring endoscopicand/or percutaneous treatment developed in 28 patients (40%). Of these patients, 4 had bileleakage (14%), 20 had anastomosis stricture (72%), and 4 had both leakage and anastomosisstricture (14%). External drainage treatment under ultrasound guidance was sufficient for 2 of4 patients with bile leakage, and these cases were accepted as minor bile leakage (7%). Overall, 26 patients underwent ERCP; of these, 8 were referred for PTC/PTBD because the guidewire and/or balloon-stent could not pass the anastomosis stricture (n=7) and common bileduct cannulation could not be obtained because of duodenal diverticulum (n=1). DiagnosticPTC was performed in 10 patients, 8 were referred after inadequate/failed ERCP procedureand two were referred directly without ERCP. Anastomosis stricture was found in 7 patientsand anastomosis stricture and bile leakage in 3. In 7 patients determined to have stricture,balloon dilatation was applied and then biliary drainage was performed. In 3 patients whohad leakage and anastomosis stricture, balloon dilatation was applied for stricture; after dilatation, an IEBD catheter was placed through the leakage region in 2 patients, while a coveredmetallic stent passing through the leakage region was placed in one patient.CONCLUSIONGenerally, ERCP is the first preferred method in biliary complications of LDLT; however, incases where a response cannot be obtained by endoscopic treatment or require complexand/or aggressive treatment, percutaneous radiological treatment should be the treatmentof choice before surgery in left lobe LDLT.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARATOPRAK, S., KUTLU, R., YILMAZ, S. (2021). Role of percutaneous radiological treatment in biliary complications associated with adult left lobe living donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 546–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/349964

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Jain A, Reyes J, Kashyap R, et al. Long-term survival after liver transplantation in 4.000 consecutive patients at a single center. Ann Surg 2000; 232:490–500. [Crossref] 2. Mazzaferro V, Regalia E, Doci R, et al. Liver transplantation for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 1996; 334:693–699. [Crossref] 3. Mazzaferro, V., Bhoori, S. ve Sposito, C. et al. Milan criteria in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an evidence‐based analysis of 15 years of experience. Liver Transpl 2011; 17:44–57. [Crossref] 4. Kawasaki S, Makuuchi M, Matsunami H, et al. Living related liver transplantation in adults. Ann Surg 1998; 227:269–274. [Crossref] 5. Soejima Y, Shimada M, Suehiro T, et al. Outcome analysis in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using the left lobe. Liver Transpl 2003; 9:581–586. [Crossref] 6. Strong RW, Lynch SV, Ong TH, Matsunami H, Koido Y, Balderson GA. Successful liver transplantation from a living donor to her son. N Engl J Med 1990; 332:1505–1507. [Crossref] 7. Ichida T, Matsunami H, Kawasaki S, Harada T, Itoh S, Asakura H. Living related-donor liver transplantation from adult to adult for primary biliary cirrhosis. Ann Internal Med 1995; 122:275–276. [Crossref] 8. Yamaoka Y, Washida M, Honda K, et al. Liver transplantation using a right lobe graft from a living related donor. Transplantation 1994; 57:1127–1129. [Crossref] 9. Emond JC, Renz JF, Ferrel LD, et al. Functional analysis of grafts from living donors. Ann Surg 1996; 224:544–554. [Crossref] 10. Roll GR, Parekh JR, Parker WF, et al. Left hepatectomy versus right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation: shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient. Liver Transpl 2013; 19:472–481. [Crossref] 11. Trotter JF, Wachs M, Everson GT, Kam I. Adultto-adult transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1074–1082. [Crossref] 12. Busuttil RW, Farmer DG, Yersiz H, et al. Analysis of long-term outcomes of 3200 liver transplantations over two decades: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 2005; 241:905–916. [Crossref] 13. Koneru B, Sterling MJ, Bahramipour PF. Bile duct strictures after liver transplantation: a changing landscape of the Achilles’ heel. Liver Transpl 2006; 12:702–704. [Crossref] 14. Soin AS, Kumaran V, Rastogi AN, et al. Evolution of a reliable biliary reconstructive technique in 400 consecutive living donor liver transplants. J Am Coll Surg 2010; 21