Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization for active arterial esophageal bleeding: a single-center experience

Sayfa
519–523
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

TAE can be attempted in the treatment of recurrent bleeding, but there is a risk of ischemia/infarct in thegastrointestinal tract involved.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSEThe study aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of arterial esophageal bleeding.METHODSNine patients (8 male, 1 female; mean age, 62.3±7.5 years) who underwent TAE for arterialesophageal bleeding between January 2004 and January 2020 were included.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The etiologies of bleeding were esophageal cancer (n=4), Mallory-Weiss syndrome (n=3), erosive esophagitis (n=1),and esophageal ulcer (n=1).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:TAE can be attempted in the treatment of recurrent bleeding, but there is a risk of ischemia/infarct in thegastrointestinal tract involved.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSEThe study aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for the treatment of arterial esophageal bleeding.METHODSNine patients (8 male, 1 female; mean age, 62.3±7.5 years) who underwent TAE for arterialesophageal bleeding between January 2004 and January 2020 were included. Preceding endoscopic treatment was unsuccessful in five patients and was not attempted in four patientsdue to the non-cooperation of the patients in endoscopic treatment. The etiologies of bleeding were esophageal cancer (n=4), Mallory-Weiss syndrome (n=3), erosive esophagitis (n=1),and esophageal ulcer (n=1). Technical and clinical success, recurrent bleeding, procedure-related complications, and clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.RESULTSThe angiographic findings for bleeding were contrast media extravasation (n=8) or tumorstaining without a definite bleeding focus (n=1). The bleeding focus at the distal esophagus (n=8) was the left gastric artery, whereas that at the middle esophagus (n=1) was theright bronchial artery. Technical success was achieved in all patients. The embolic agentswere n-butyl cyanoacrylate (NBCA, n=5), gelatin sponge particles (n=2), microcoils (n=1), andNBCA with gelatin sponge particles (n=1). Clinical success was achieved in 77.8% of cases(7/9); two patients with recurrent bleeding one day after the first TAE showed culprit arteriesdifferent from the bleeding foci at the first TAE. One patient who underwent embolization ofboth the left and short gastric arteries died of gastric infract/perforation one month after TAE.CONCLUSIONTAE can be an alternative to the treatment of arterial esophageal bleeding. TAE can be attempted in the treatment of recurrent bleeding, but there is a risk of ischemia/infarct in thegastrointestinal tract involved.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALRASHİDİ, I., KİM, T., SHİN, J. H., ALRESHİD, M., PARK, M., JANG, E. B. (2021). Efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial embolization for active arterial esophageal bleeding: a single-center experience. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 519–523. https://ajindex.com/articles/349940

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Samuel R, Bilal M, Tayyem O, Guturu P. Evaluation and management of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dis Mon 2018
  2. 333–343. [Crossref] 2. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012
  3. 1179– 1187. [Crossref] 3. Barkun AN, Bardou M, Kuipers EJ, et al. International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Ann Intern Med 2010
  4. 101–113. [Crossref] 4. Aina R, Oliva VL, Therasse E, et al. Arterial embolotherapy for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: outcome assessment. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001
  5. 195–200. [Crossref] 5. Schenker MP, Duszak R, Jr., Soulen MC, et al. Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and transcatheter embolotherapy: clinical and technical factors impacting success and survival. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001
  6. 1263–1271. [Crossref] 6. Loffroy R, Guiu B, D'Athis P, et al. Arterial embolotherapy for endoscopically unmanageable acute gastroduodenal hemorrhage: predictors of early rebleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009
  7. 515–523. [Crossref] 7. Kim PH, Tsauo J, Shin JH, Yun SC. Transcatheter arterial embolization of gastrointestinal bleeding with n-butyl cyanoacrylate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017
  8. 522–531. [Crossref] 8. Rosch J, Dotter CT, Brown MJ. Selective arterial embolization. A new method for control of acute gastrointestinal bleeding. Radiology 1972
  9. 303–306. [Crossref] 9. O'Connor SD, Taylor AJ, Williams EC, Winter TC. Coagulation concepts update. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
  10. 1656–1664. [Crossref] 10. Omary RA, Bettmann MA, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the reporting and archiving of interventional radiology procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2002
  11. 879– 881. [Crossref] 11. Lang EK. Transcatheter embolization in management of hemorrhage from duodenal ulcer: long-term results and complications. Radiology 1992
  12. 703–707. [Crossref] 12. Dempsey DT, Burke DR, Reilly RS, McLean GK, Rosato EF. Angiography in poor-risk patients with massive nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Surg 1990
  13. 282–286. [Crossref] 13. Encarnacion CE, Kadir S, Beam CA, Payne CS. Gastrointestinal bleeding: treatment with gastrointestinal arterial embolization. Radiology 1992
  14. 505–508. [Crossref] 14. Evangelista PT, Hallisey MJ. Transcatheter embolization for acute lower gastrointestinal