Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Diagnostic performance rates of the ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS based on histopathological evidence

Sayfa
511–518
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In light ofour results, we demonstrated the strengths and weaknesses of the ACR- and EU-TIRADS for physicians who should be familiar with them for optimal management of thyroid nodules.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSEIn this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of malignancy stratification algorithms of theAmerican College of Radiology (ACR) and European Thyroid Association (ETA) in the delineationof thyroid nodules using a database of nodules that were unequivocally diagnosed by means ofhistopathological examination and meticulously matched with the imaged nodules.METHODSA total of 165 patients having 251 thyroid nodules with histopathologically proven definitivediagnoses during a 5-year period were included in this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thediagnostic effectiveness in the delineation of thyroid nodules and unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNAB) rates were evaluated.RESULTSOverall, 189 nodules (75.30%) were diagnosed as benign, while 62 nodules (24.70%) were reported to be malignant based on histopathological assessment.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In light ofour results, we demonstrated the strengths and weaknesses of the ACR- and EU-TIRADS for physicians who should be familiar with them for optimal management of thyroid nodules.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSEIn this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of malignancy stratification algorithms of theAmerican College of Radiology (ACR) and European Thyroid Association (ETA) in the delineationof thyroid nodules using a database of nodules that were unequivocally diagnosed by means ofhistopathological examination and meticulously matched with the imaged nodules.METHODSA total of 165 patients having 251 thyroid nodules with histopathologically proven definitivediagnoses during a 5-year period were included in this study. All patients had preoperativelyundergone ultrasonography (US) examination, and US characteristics of the thyroid noduleswere retrospectively analyzed and assigned in compliance with the thyroid imaging reportingand data system categories recommended by the ACR (ACR-TIRADS) and ETA (EU-TIRADS). Thediagnostic effectiveness in the delineation of thyroid nodules and unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNAB) rates were evaluated.RESULTSOverall, 189 nodules (75.30%) were diagnosed as benign, while 62 nodules (24.70%) were reported to be malignant based on histopathological assessment. Sensitivity and specificity rateswere 71% and 75% for ACR-TIRADS and 73% and 80% for EU-TIRADS. The area under the curvevalues were 0.78 and 0.80 for ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS, respectively. The unnecessary FNABrates were 61% for ACR-TIRADS and 64% for EU-TIRADS as per the recommended criteria of eachalgorithm.CONCLUSIONThe diagnostic performance of both malignancy stratification systems was signified to be moderate and sufficient in a cohort of nodules with definite histopathological diagnosis. In light ofour results, we demonstrated the strengths and weaknesses of the ACR- and EU-TIRADS for physicians who should be familiar with them for optimal management of thyroid nodules.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HEKİMSOY, İ., ÖZTÜRK, E., ERTAN, Y., ORMAN, M. N., KAVUKÇU, G., ÖZGEN, A. G., ÖZDEMİR, M., ÖZBEK, S. S. (2021). Diagnostic performance rates of the ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS based on histopathological evidence. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 511–518. https://ajindex.com/articles/349939

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Guth S, Theune U, Aberle J, et al. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. Eur J Clin Invest 2009
  2. 699–706. [Crossref] 2. Fisher SB, Perrier ND. The incidental thyroid nodule. CA Cancer J Clin 2018
  3. 97–105. [Crossref] 3. Davies L, Welch HG. Current thyroid cancer trends in the United States. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014
  4. 317–322. [Crossref] 4. Burman KD, Wartofsky L. Clinical practice. Thyroid nodules. N Engl J Med 2015
  5. 2347– 2356. [Crossref] 5. Grani G, Calvanese A, Carbotta G, et al. Intrinsic factors affecting adequacy of thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration cytology. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2013
  6. 141–144. [Crossref] 6. Kim E-K, Park CS, Chung WY, et al. New sonographic criteria for recommending fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable solid nodules of the thyroid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002
  7. 687–691. [Crossref] 7. Bonavita JA, Mayo J, Babb J, et al. Pattern recognition of benign nodules at ultrasound of the thyroid: which nodules can be left alone? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009
  8. 207–213. [Crossref] 8. Campanella P, Ianni F, Rota CA, et al. Quantification of cancer risk of each clinical and ultrasonographic suspicious feature of thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 2014
  9. R203–211. [Crossref] 9. Remonti LR, Kramer CK, Leitão CB, et al. Thyroid ultrasound features and risk of carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Thyroid 2015
  10. 538–550. [Crossref] 10. Grant EG, Tessler FN, Hoang JK, et al. Thyroid Ultrasound Reporting Lexicon: White Paper of the ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2015
  11. 12(12 Pt A):1272–1279. [Crossref] 11. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 2017
  12. 587–595. [Crossref] 12. Tappouni RR, Itri JN, McQueen TS, et al. ACR TIRADS: pitfalls, solutions, and future directions. Radiographics 2019
  13. 2040–2052. [Crossref] 13. Russ G, Bonnema SJ, Erdogan MF, et al. European Thyroid Association guidelines for ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules in adults: The EU-TIRADS. Eur Thyroid J 2017
  14. 225–237. [Crossref] 14. Grani G, Lamartina L, Cantisani V, et al. Interobserver agreement of various thyroid imaging reporting and data systems. Endocr Connect 2018
  15. 1–7. [Crossref] 15. Grani G, L