Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Female medical student impression of interventional radiology: what can we do to improve this?

Sayfa
542–545
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

More lectures and direct clinicalexposure are paramount to their understanding of IR.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSEThe number of female medical students has increased significantly in the last decade due toincreased gender diversity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The students ranged from first to final year study of Medicine and were between 18 and30 years of age.RESULTSThe majority of medical students (68%) were unaware of what IR is and 98% denied havingteaching about IR in their university.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:More lectures and direct clinicalexposure are paramount to their understanding of IR.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSEThe number of female medical students has increased significantly in the last decade due toincreased gender diversity. However, the number of female doctors going into interventionalradiology (IR) does not reflect this trend on an international scale.METHODSA standardized set of questions was created looking into medical students’ demographics,awareness of IR, their general opinion, and whether they would consider IR as a potentialcareer path. One-hundred female medical students from the United Kingdom, Germany, Poland, Spain, and New Zealand were approached either directly or via an online survey platform. The students ranged from first to final year study of Medicine and were between 18 and30 years of age.RESULTSThe majority of medical students (68%) were unaware of what IR is and 98% denied havingteaching about IR in their university. Influential factors to choosing IR were more exposure toIR in medical school (15%), more options to allow family life (15%), direct training pathway toIR rather than via diagnostic radiology (13%), options of private practice (13%), and understanding more about radiation protection during pregnancy (12%).CONCLUSIONA lack of awareness about what IR is and misconceptions, particularly regarding radiationexposure during pregnancy, play an important role in discouraging entry into IR. Additionally, some of the concerns raised were directed at IR training pathway. Female IR consultantsshould also take leadership initiative to act as role models. More lectures and direct clinicalexposure are paramount to their understanding of IR.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HUASEN, B., SUWATHEP, P., KHAN, A., CONNOR, B., HOLDEN, A. (2021). Female medical student impression of interventional radiology: what can we do to improve this?. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 542–545. https://ajindex.com/articles/349926

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Dacre J, Shepherd S. Women and medicine: the future. Clin Med (Lond) 2009; 9:307–308. [Crossref] 2. Dageforde LA, Kibbe M, Jackson GP. Recruiting women to vascular surgery and other surgical specialties. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57:262–267. [Crossref] 3. Bailey C, Sok M, Komorowski D. Entrance of women into interventional radiology lags behind other surgically oriented specialties. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 28:S187–S188. [Crossref] 4. Radiology F.o.C. Clinical Radiology UK workforce census 2015 report. [Internet] London: Royal College of Radiologists; 2016. Accessed 22nd December 2019. Available at: https:// www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_ publication_files/bfcr166_cr_census.pdf. 5. Wah T, Belli A. The Interventional Radiology (IR) Gender Gap: A Prospective Online Survey by the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2018; 41:1241 –1253. [Crossref] 6. Foo M, Maingard J, Wang M. et al Women in interventional radiology: insights into Australia's gender gap. Clin Radiol 2020 Apr 21. 7. Matsumoto MM, Tullius Jr TG, Navuluri R. Gender-Specific Factors Influencing Medical Students' Career Choice of IR. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019; 30:1432–1437. [Crossref] 8. Di Marco L, Anderson MB. The new Interventional Radiology/Diagnostic Radiology dual certificate: "higher standards, better education". Insights Imaging 2016; 7:163–165. [Crossref] 9. Dauer LT, Miller DL, Schueler B, et al. Occupational radiation protection of pregnant or potentially pregnant workers in IR: a joint guideline of the society of interventional radiology and the cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of Europe. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26:171–181. [Crossref] 10. Brent RL. Counseling patients exposed to ionizing radiation during pregnancy. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2006; 20:198–204. [Crossref] 11. Yuan ED, Makris J, DeBenedectis CM. Do interventions intended to increase female medical student interest in radiology work? Preliminary findings. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2018; 47:382– 386. [Crossref]