Dergiler / JAREM / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

An Approach to Perianastomotic Pouches due to Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Resection

Rektum Rezeksiyon Sonrası Gelişen Anastomoz Kaçaklarına Bağlı Perianastomotik Poşlara Yaklaşım

Dergi
JAREM
Sayfa
102–106
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Patients with Endo-SPONGE® placement had less stricture and defecation problems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Conservative treatment of perianastomotic pouch due to low anastomosis in rectal surgery is possible in patients without generalized peritonitis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: During the initial operation, 13 patients underwent loop ileostomy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Patients with Endo-SPONGE® placement had less stricture and defecation problems.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Conservative treatment of perianastomotic pouch due to low anastomosis in rectal surgery is possible in patients without generalized peritonitis. This report describes the treatment of this complication using Endo-SPONGE® and transrectal endoscopic lavage. Methods: Sixteen patients with abscess resulting from anastomotic leakage after rectal resections were retrospectively reviewed; nine of them were treated with transrectal endoscopic lavage and the other seven patients were treated with endoscopic vacuum therapy. Results: During the initial operation, 13 patients underwent loop ileostomy. In three patients, diverting stoma was created after anastomotic leakage was observed. The mean volume of the abscess cavity was 82.6 cc (24.7-128) for those treated with EndoVAC (vacuum-assisted closure) and 33.3 cc (10.5-61.1) for those treated with endoscopic lavage. The number of sponges exchanged was 13.8 (5-25), and the time required for pouch closure was 74.3 days (20-136) for negative aspiration therapy and 66.1 days (30-210) for transrectal endoscopic lavage. As a late anastomotic complication, we recorded stricture in only one of seven patients (14.2%) treated with Endo-SPONGE®. Four of nine patients (44.4%) that underwent endoscopic lavage developed strictures, which needed reoperative procedures. Conclusion: According to our experience, the sponge placement and negative pressure aspiration can be helpful in the treatment of anastomotic leakage after low anterior resections for rectal cancer. The results of time until cavity closure are not inferior to those of the conventional treatment, and a functional advantage over the conventional approach was observed. Patients with Endo-SPONGE® placement had less stricture and defecation problems.

Abstract

Amaç: Rektal cerrahide aşağı anastomozlardan dolayı oluşan peri-anastomotik poşların konservatif tedavisi, hastalarda generalize peritonit bulguları olmadığı durumlarda mümkündür. Çalışmamızda bu tür komplikasyonların Endo-SPONGE® ve transrektal endoskopik yıkama ile tedavisini tanımlamaktadır. Yöntemler: Rektal rezeksiyon sonrası anastomoz kaçağından abse gelişen 16 hasta retrospektif olarak incelendi, bunlardan 9’u endoskopik transrektal yıkama ve diğer 7 hastada endoskopik vakum yöntemi ile tedavi edildi. Bulgular: On üç hastaya ilk ameliyat esnasında loop ileostomi uygulandı, 3 hastaya ise anastomoz kaçağı gözlendikten sonra saptırıcı stoma yapıldı. Ortalama abse kavitesi hacmi EndoVAC (vakum yardımlı kapama) ile tedavi edilen grupta 82,6 82,6 cc (24,7-128) ve endoskopik yıkama grubunda ise 33,3 (10,5-61,1) cc idi. Değiştirilen sponge (sünger) sayısı 13,8 (5-25) ve poşun kapanması için gereken süre negatif aspirasyon grubu için ortalama 74,3 (20-136) gün ve transrektal endoskopik yıkama grubunda da 66,1 (30-210) gün idi. Geç anastomoz komplikasyonu olarak, Endo-SPONGE® ile tedavi edilen 7 hastadan yalnızca birinde (%14,2) darlık kaydedilirken konservatif endoskopik yıkama grubundaki 9 hastadan 4’ünde (%44,4) reoperasyona gerek gösteren darlık gelişmiştir. Sonuç: Deneyimlerimize göre sponge yerleştirilmesi ve negatif basınçlı aspirasyon, rektal kanser için yapılan aşağı anterior rezeksiyon sonrası anastomoz kaçağı tedavisinde yararlı olabilir. Kavitenin kapanma süresi sonuçları konvansyonel tedaviye göre kötü değildir, fonksiyonel avantaj konvansyonel tedaviye üstün larak izlendi. Endo-SPONGE® yerleştirilen hastalar daha az darlık ve defekasyon problemine sahiptir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİRAY, O., SAYAR, S., ER, A. M., BAYRAK, A. H., GÖNÜLLÜ, D. (2021). An Approach to Perianastomotic Pouches due to Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Resection. JAREM, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 102–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/347780

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010; 147: 339-51
  2. Chambers WM, Mortensen NJ. Postoperative leakage and abscess formation after colorectal surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004; 18: 865-80
  3. Phitayakorn R, Delaney CP, Reynolds HL, Champagne BJ, Heriot AG, Neary P, et al. Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic anscess after colorectal surgery. World J Surg 2008; 32: 1147-56
  4. Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Management of low colorectal anastomotic leak: preserving he anastomosis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 702-13
  5. Keskin M, Bayram O, Bulut T, Balik E. Efectiveness of endoluminal vacuum-assisted closure therapy(endosponge)for the treatment of pelvic anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2015; 25: 505-8
  6. Morykvas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI, Mc Guirt W. Vacuum assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 553-62
  7. Shalaby M, Emile S, Elfeki H, Sakr A, Wexner SD, Sileri P. Systematic review of endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy as salvage treatment for rectal anastomotic leakage. BJS Open 2019; 3: 153-60
  8. Nagell CF, Holte K. Treatment of anastomotic leakage after rectal resection with transrectal vacuum-assisted drainage (VAC). A method for rapid control of pelvic sepsis and healing. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 657-60
  9. Deams F, Luyer M, Lange JF. Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment. World J Gastrointerol 2013; 19: 2293-7
  10. Goenka MK, Goenka U. Endotherapy of leaks and fistula. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7: 702-13
  11. Mees ST, Palmes D, Menninger R, Senninger N, Haier J, Bruewer M. Endo vacuum assisted closure treatment for rectal anastomotic insufficiency. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 404-10
  12. Chopra SS, Mrak K, Hünernein M. The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surgery 2009; 145: 182-8
  13. Zeeshan A, Najam H, Shahd N, Yee SH. Efficacy of Vacuum assited Closure (VAC) in wound healing. Surg Sci 2019; 10: 173-215
  14. Weidenhagen R, Gruetzner KU, Wiecken T, Spelberg F, Jaunch KV. Endoscopic vacuum assisted closure of anast