Dergiler / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

During Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Which Combination of Analgesia Method is Effective? A Prospective Randomized Study

Sayfa
191–197
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

ANB in patients with large prostate is considered to increase patientsatisfaction by decreasing pain scores, especially in apical cores.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectivity of pain palliation with intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), periprostatic nerve block (PPNB),apex nerve block (ANB), or their combination during transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy.Materials and Methods: A total of 160 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy were included in this prospective study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients were dividedinto three groups randomly: IRLA group (group 1, n=40), PPNB + IRLA group (group 2, n=60), and ANB + PPNB + IRLA group (group 3, n=60).Visual analog scale (VAS) was used at three separate times during prostate biopsy: on insertion of the probe through the anal canal, during theadministration of anesthesia, and during needle biopsy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:ANB in patients with large prostate is considered to increase patientsatisfaction by decreasing pain scores, especially in apical cores.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectivity of pain palliation with intrarectal local anesthesia (IRLA), periprostatic nerve block (PPNB),apex nerve block (ANB), or their combination during transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy.Materials and Methods: A total of 160 patients who underwent TRUS biopsy were included in this prospective study. Patients were dividedinto three groups randomly: IRLA group (group 1, n=40), PPNB + IRLA group (group 2, n=60), and ANB + PPNB + IRLA group (group 3, n=60).Visual analog scale (VAS) was used at three separate times during prostate biopsy: on insertion of the probe through the anal canal, during theadministration of anesthesia, and during needle biopsy. The pain palliation of each method was compared among the groups.Results: No significant difference was observed in demographic features among the groups. However, biopsy-related pain was the highest in group1 for each core, followed by group 2 and group 3 (p<0.05 for all core scores). The pain level felt with local anesthesia administration was higherin group 3 than in group 2 and the lowest in group 1 (p<0.05). In addition, VAS scores were significantly higher in patients with large prostate,especially in apical cores.Conclusion: In prostate biopsy, ANB was more effective in reducing pain. ANB in patients with large prostate is considered to increase patientsatisfaction by decreasing pain scores, especially in apical cores.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖGER, Y. E., ECER, G., ÖZKENT, M. S., KILINÇ, M. T., KARALEZLİ, G. (2021). During Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Which Combination of Analgesia Method is Effective? A Prospective Randomized Study. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 191–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/347523

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-386
  2. Hodge KK, McNeal JE, Stamey TA. Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J Urol 1989;142:66-70
  3. Brown AM, Elbuluk O, Mertan F, Sankineni S, Margolis DJ, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:1788-1799
  4. Carroll PR, Parsons JK, Andriole G, Bahnson RR, Castle EP, Catalona WJ, Dahl DM, Davis JW, Epstein JI, Etzioni RB, Farrington T, Hemstreet GP 3rd, Kawachi MH, Kim S, Lange PH, Loughlin KR, Lowrance W, Maroni P, Mohler J, Morgan TM, Moses KA, Nadler RB, Poch M, Scales C, Shaneyfelt TM, Smaldone MC, Sonn G, Sprenkle P, Vickers AJ, Wake R, Shead DA, FreedmanCass DA. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2016. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2016;14:509-519. 5. van den Bergh RCN, Loeb S, Roobol MJ. Impact of Early Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer on Survival Outcomes. Eur Urol Focus 2015;1:137-146
  5. Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, Lam TB, Mason MD, Matveev VB, Moldovan PC, van den Bergh RCN, Van den Broeck T, Van der Poel HG, Moldovan PC, Van der Kwast TH, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Cornford P. EAU-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2016;71:618-629
  6. Ukimura O, Coleman JA, de la Taille A, Emberton M, Epstein JI, Freedland SJ, Giannarini G, Kibel AS, Montironi R, Ploussard G, Roobol MJ, Scattoni V, Jones JS. Contemporary role of systematic prostate biopsies: indications, techniques, and implications for patient care. Eur Urol 2013;63:214-230
  7. Bastide C, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Ortega JC, Coulange C. Tolerance of pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: risk factors. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2003;6:239-241
  8. Tiong HY, Liew LC, Samuel M, Consigliere D, Esuvaranathan K. A metaanalysis of local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2007;10:127-136
  9. Autorino R, De Sio M, Di Lorenzo G, Damiano R, Perdonà S, Cindolo L, D’Armiento M. How to decrease pain during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a look at the literature. J Urol 2005;174:2091-2097
  10. Maccagnano C, Scattoni V, Ro