KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Urological Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

Assessment of the Knowledge Level of Patients About Radiation: An Invisible Enemy in the Endourology Clinic

Reha GİRGİN
Cemal ÖNAL
Sayfa
156–161
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Patients with higher education levels gave correct answers to the questions of whether the surgicalprocedure can be performed without radiation and whether they have knowledge about the negative effects of radiation (p=0.05, p=0.036).Conclusion: The results suggest that patients still have insufficient knowledge about fluoroscopy (X-ray), which has an important place inendourological surgeries, and they do not have enough knowledge about their planned procedure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to measure the level of knowledge of patients on the role of radiation used in the endourological intervention.Materials and Methods: Between January and February 2020, patients were asked to fill out an anonymous questionnaire before the procedure.The questionnaire included questions on demographics, ionizing radiation, and planned procedure.Results: Of the 118 respondents, 35.6% were female and 64.4% were male.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The mean age was 55.6±15.3 years.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Patients with higher education levels gave correct answers to the questions of whether the surgicalprocedure can be performed without radiation and whether they have knowledge about the negative effects of radiation (p=0.05, p=0.036).Conclusion: The results suggest that patients still have insufficient knowledge about fluoroscopy (X-ray), which has an important place inendourological surgeries, and they do not have enough knowledge about their planned procedure.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to measure the level of knowledge of patients on the role of radiation used in the endourological intervention.Materials and Methods: Between January and February 2020, patients were asked to fill out an anonymous questionnaire before the procedure.The questionnaire included questions on demographics, ionizing radiation, and planned procedure.Results: Of the 118 respondents, 35.6% were female and 64.4% were male. The mean age was 55.6±15.3 years. Moreover, 25.4% of the participantswere in the geriatric age (GA) group, and 17.4% were in the young age (YA) group. None of the GA group were aware of the risk when radiationwas not used in the planned procedure, and the result was significant (p=0.006). Only 57% of the YA group and 34.4% of the GA group were awareof the harmful effects of radiation (p=0.027). Patients with higher education levels gave correct answers to the questions of whether the surgicalprocedure can be performed without radiation and whether they have knowledge about the negative effects of radiation (p=0.05, p=0.036).Conclusion: The results suggest that patients still have insufficient knowledge about fluoroscopy (X-ray), which has an important place inendourological surgeries, and they do not have enough knowledge about their planned procedure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GİRGİN, R., ÖNAL, C. (2021). Assessment of the Knowledge Level of Patients About Radiation: An Invisible Enemy in the Endourology Clinic. Journal of Urological Surgery, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 156–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/347522

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Tzelves L, Somani B, Knoll T, Kamphuis G, Sarica K, Seitz C, Liatsikos E, Skolarikos A. Level of knowledge on radiation exposure and compliance to wearing protective equipment: where do endourologists stand? An ESUT/ EULIS survey. World J Urol 2020;38:761-768
  2. Yecies T, Averch TD, Semins MJ. Identifying and managing the risks of medical ionizing radiation in endourology. Can J Urol 2018;25:9154-9160
  3. Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Manios E, Vardas P, Gourtsoyiannis N. Accurate assessment of patient effective radiation dose and associated detriment risk from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Circulation 2001;104:58-62
  4. Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Manios E, Vardas P, Gourtsoyiannis N. Occupational exposure in the electrophysiology laboratory: quantifying and minimizing radiation burden. Br J Radiol 2006;79:644-651
  5. Rehani MM, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Vañó E, Miller DL, Walsh S, Giordano BD, Persliden J. ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Ann ICRP 2010;40:1-102
  6. Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, Scales CD Jr, Rampersaud E, Pearle MS, Preminger GM. Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol 2009;181:668- 672
  7. Ceylan I, Er A, Nayır T, Yaslı G, Akman C. Radyolojik Tetkik Yaptıran Hastaların Radyasyonun Zararlı Etkileri Hakkında Bilgi Düzeylerinin Araştırılması. Smyrna Tıp Dergisi 2014;2:1-6
  8. Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004;231:393-398
  9. Schuster AL, Forman HP, Strassle PD, Meyer LT, Connelly SV, Lee CI. Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making. Emerg Radiol 2018;25:41-49
  10. Sweetman SJ, Bernard J. Patient Knowledge and Perception of Radiation Risk in Diagnostic Imaging: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Patient Exp 2020;7:110- 115
  11. Committee to Assess Health Risks From Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Division of Earth and LifeStudies, National Research Council of the National Academies. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006
  12. American College of Radiology Website. ACR Appropriateness