Dergiler / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2014 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 6

Tablets in Education: Outcome Expectancy and Anxiety of Middle School Students

Sayfa
2259–2272
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was also found that students with previous tablet experience were more optimistic regarding outcome expectancy

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:It is planned that every student in all primary, middle, and high schools (public schools) under the administration of the Turkish Ministry of National Education receive a tablet through the FATİH Project.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Participants totaled 939 students in eight middle schools located in different cities throughout Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was also found that students with previous tablet experience were more optimistic regarding outcome expectancy
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

It is planned that every student in all primary, middle, and high schools (public schools) under the administration of the Turkish Ministry of National Education receive a tablet through the FATİH Project. Research shows that many teachers hold reservations toward students using tablets for educational purposes. The purpose of this study is to determine middle school students’ perceptions regarding the integration of tablets into the learning process. Participants totaled 939 students in eight middle schools located in different cities throughout Turkey. Data were gathered through means of a survey (questionnaire) which included demographics like grade level and gender as well as items on tablet related issues and on student opinions. Two factors – outcome expectancy and tablet anxiety – were identified through an exploratory factor analysis. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted afterward in order to confirm and exemplify factors and their items. Two measurement models were tested, the latter returning a good model fit. The MANOVA test results showed that grade level affected the opinions on outcome expectancy, while gender affected tablet anxiety. It was found that 7th graders were the most optimistic of all grades in terms of outcome expectancy and that males were more withdrawn. It was also found that students with previous tablet experience were more optimistic regarding outcome expectancy

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖRHAN, M. F., ÖNCÜ, S., ŞENTÜRK, A. (2014). Tablets in Education: Outcome Expectancy and Anxiety of Middle School Students. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 6, 2259–2272. https://ajindex.com/articles/346171

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Anthony, L. M., Clarke, M. C., Anderson, S. ]. (2000). Technophobia and personality subtypes in sample of South African university students. Computers in Human Behavior, 16(1), 31-44.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  3. Batur, Z., Gülveren, H., Balcı, S. (2013). An empirical work about the attitudes of students receiving education under “tablet pc pilot practice” towards use of technology in Turkish lectures. European Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 29-42.
  4. Bozionelos, N. (2001). Computer anxiety: Relationship with computer experience and prevalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 213-224.
  5. Bozionelos, N. (2004). Socio—economic background and computer use: The role of computer anxiety and computer experience in their relationship. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(5), 725-746.
  6. Broos, A. (2005). Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: Male selfassurance and female hesitation. Cyberpsychology Behavior, 8(1), 21-31.
  7. Brosnan, M. I. (1998). The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14(3), 223-234.
  8. Callum, K. S. M. (2011). Influences on the adoption of mobile technology by student and teacher (Doctoral dissertation, Massey University). Retrieved from http:// mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/3684 Chen, W, Balijepally, V., Sutanto, P. (2012). Does mobile technology matter? student-centric perspective. IBIMA Business Review, 2012(Article ID 424156), 1-10. Retrieved from http://Www.ibimapublishing.com]journals/ lBIMABR/2012/424l56/a424156.html Chua, S. L., Chen, D. T., Wong, A. F. (1999). Computer anxiety and its correlates: meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 609-623.
  9. Cicchino, R., Mirliss, D. (2004). Tablet pcs: powerful teaching tool. In World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (Vol. 2004, No. 1, pp. 543-548).
  10. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer selfefficacy: Development of measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
  11. Compeau, D., Higgins, C. A., Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158. Cooper, ]. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320— 33