Dergiler / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Prediction of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: comparison between shear-wave elastography based ultrasomics and MRI

Sayfa
424–431
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, SWE ultrasomics might be used to better guide preoperative individual therapies for patients with rectal cancer.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:PURPOSE We aimed to explore the diagnostic efficiency of shear-wave elastography (SWE) ultrasomics in the preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) metastasis in rectal cancer.METHODSThis study included 87 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal cancer, with data gathered from August 2017 to August 2018.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 1044 ultrasomics features of rectal tumor were collected with AK software from the SWE examinations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, SWE ultrasomics might be used to better guide preoperative individual therapies for patients with rectal cancer.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

PURPOSE We aimed to explore the diagnostic efficiency of shear-wave elastography (SWE) ultrasomics in the preoperative prediction of lymph node (LN) metastasis in rectal cancer.METHODSThis study included 87 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal cancer, with data gathered from August 2017 to August 2018. A total of 1044 ultrasomics features of rectal tumor were collected with AK software from the SWE examinations. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used for feature selection and building a SWE ultrasomics signature. The diagnostic performance was evaluated with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. Then, the diagnostic performance of the SWE ultrasomics signature was compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).RESULTSOf the 87 patients, 40 (46.0%) had LN metastasis. Thirteen ultrasomics features of rectal tumor were selected as the most significant features. The SWE ultrasomics signature correlated with LN metastasis (p < 0.001). Patients with LN metastasis had higher signature than patients without LN metastasis. In terms of diagnostic performance, SWE ultrasomics signature was significantly superior to MRI (AUC, 0.883 vs. 0.760, p = 0.034). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of SWE ultrasomics signature were 82.8%, 87.5%, 78.8%, 77.8%, and 88.1%, respectively, while those of MRI were 75.9%, 77.5%, 74.5%, 72.1%, and 79.6%, respectively.CONCLUSIONSWE ultrasomics is a more accurate predictive method for identifying LN metastasis preoperatively than MRI. Thus, SWE ultrasomics might be used to better guide preoperative individual therapies for patients with rectal cancer.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

XIAN, M. F., ZHENG, X., XU, J. B., LI, X., CHEN, L. D., WANG, W. (2021). Prediction of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: comparison between shear-wave elastography based ultrasomics and MRI. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 424–431. https://ajindex.com/articles/346102

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet 2014; 383:1490–1502. [Crossref] 2. Benson AB, 3rd, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal Cancer, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018; 16:874–901. [Crossref] 3. Smith N, Brown G. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Acta Oncol 2008; 47:20–31. [Crossref] 4. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: Systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007; 99:433–441. [Crossref] 5. Tudyka V, Blomqvist L, Beets-Tan RG, et al. Eurecca consensus conference highlights about colon & rectal cancer multidisciplinary management: The radiology experts review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:469–475. [Crossref] 6. Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson AB, 3rd, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009; 7:838–881. [Crossref] 7. Mortenson MM, Khatri VP, Bennett JJ, Petrelli NJ. Total mesorectal excision and pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer: An appraisal. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 2007; 16:177–197. [Crossref] 8. Moreno CC, Sullivan PS, Mittal PK. MRI evaluation of rectal cancer: Staging and restaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2017; 46:234–241. [Crossref] 9. Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19:2212– 2223. [Crossref] 10. Cartana ET, Parvu D, Saftoiu A. Endoscopic ultrasound: Current role and future perspectives in managing rectal cancer patients. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2011; 20:407–413. 11. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, et al. Efsumb guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: Clinical applications. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34:238–253. [Crossref] 12. Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, Choudhary A, Antillon MR, Brugge WR. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose nodal invasion by rectal cancers: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16:1255–1265. [Crossref] 13. Herzog U, von Flue M, Tondelli P, Schuppisser JP. How accurate is endorectal ultrasound in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36:127–134. [Crossref] 14. Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, et al. Radiomics: The process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 30:123