Dergiler / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Evidence from 810 cases Risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Evidence from 810 cases

Sayfa
1–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings suggest that endoscopist and his/her experiencehave a major role in avoiding or minimizing the negative effects of these factors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: The risk and causes of post ERCP pancreatitis and associated risk factors are summarized,and potential prophylactic measures with strong evidence for effective prevention of post ERCP pancreatitisare discussed.Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected patient data were reviewed retrospectively for a total of 810ERCPs undertaken in our hospital between June 2015 and September 2018.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We focused on factors related to endoscopistexperience, ERCP team and ERCP room equipment.Results: A total of 810 patients, including 439 females and 371 males, were enrolled in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings suggest that endoscopist and his/her experiencehave a major role in avoiding or minimizing the negative effects of these factors.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: The risk and causes of post ERCP pancreatitis and associated risk factors are summarized,and potential prophylactic measures with strong evidence for effective prevention of post ERCP pancreatitisare discussed.Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected patient data were reviewed retrospectively for a total of 810ERCPs undertaken in our hospital between June 2015 and September 2018. All ERCP procedures were performed by a single surgeon. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis were investigated, which included endoscopist experience, ERCP team and ERCP room equipment. We focused on factors related to endoscopistexperience, ERCP team and ERCP room equipment.Results: A total of 810 patients, including 439 females and 371 males, were enrolled in this study. Amylaselevels and pancreatitis were evaluated 24 hours after ERCP. Post ERCP pancreatitis developed in a total of46 (5.5%) patients out of 810 patients undergoing ERCP. Also, the incidence of post ERCP pancreatitis was2-fold higher in the first 400 patients versus in the last 400 patients. This higher post ERCP pancreatitis incidence found among the first 400 patients of our series can be explained by the relative lack of experienceand expertise of the endoscopist and the ERCP team.Conclusion: The risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis is mBahtiyar Muhammedoğluultifactorial and the effects of some of the risk factorsmay be minimized or completely eliminated. The findings suggest that endoscopist and his/her experiencehave a major role in avoiding or minimizing the negative effects of these factors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MUHAMMEDOĞLU, B. (2020). Risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Evidence from 810 cases Risk factors for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: Evidence from 810 cases. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/345107

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Jeurnink SM, Siersema PD, Steyerberg EW, Dees J, Poley JW, Haringsma J, et al. Predictors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prognosticmodel for early discharge. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2892–900
  2. Lee YK, Yang MJ, Kim SS, Noh CK, Cho HJ, Lim SG, et al. Prediction of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis Using 4-Hour Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Serum Amylase and Lipase Levels. J Korean Med Sci 2017;32:1814–9
  3. Matsubara H, Urano F, Kinoshita Y, Okamura S, Kawashima H, Goto H, et al. Analysis of the risk factors for severity in post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: The indication of prophylactic treatments. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017;9:189–95
  4. Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan WL, Lau JY, Sung JJ. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;70:1211–9
  5. Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM, Eusebi LH, Ceroni L, Laterza L, et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis?: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2343–50
  6. Lerch MM. Classifying an unpredictable disease: the revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis. Gut 2013;62:2–3
  7. Kim J. Training in Endoscopy: Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Clin Endosc 2017;50:334–9
  8. Rabenstein T, Hahn EG. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: is the endoscopist’s experience the major risk factor?. JOP 2002;3:177– 87
  9. Hellier MD, Morris AI. ERCP training--time for change. Gut 2000;47:459–60
  10. Thaker AM, Mosko JD, Berzin TM. Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015;3:32–40
  11. Liao Z, Hu LH, Li ZS, Zuo CJ, Wang L, Jin G, et al. Multidisciplinary team meeting before therapeutic ERCP: A prospective study with 1,909 cases. J Interv Gastroenterol 2011;1:64–9
  12. Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P, Hamlyn A, Logan RF, Martin D, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice. Gut 2007;56:821–9
  13. Davee T, Garcia JA, Baron TH. Precut sphincterotomy for selective biliary duct cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol 2012;25:291– 302