Dergiler / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement without sedation in high-risk patients: A safe and well-tolerated technique

Sayfa
174–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As complications, tube dislodgement was observed in 3 patients and wound infections were recorded in 4 patients.Conclusion: PEG placement using a peroral route without sedation is a safe and well-tolerated method in patients with high sedation risk.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is regarded as the standard enteral feeding procedure for patients requiring long-term enteral nutrition.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This article is a retrospective analysis of 49 patients at high-risk of complications, who undergone unsedated peroral PEG tube placement.Materials and Methods: PEG was placed in 49 patients through the peroral endoscopic way without sedation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As complications, tube dislodgement was observed in 3 patients and wound infections were recorded in 4 patients.Conclusion: PEG placement using a peroral route without sedation is a safe and well-tolerated method in patients with high sedation risk.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is regarded as the standard enteral feeding procedure for patients requiring long-term enteral nutrition. Although it is considered as a safe procedure, PEG may be associated with severe cardiorespiratory complications, especially in patients with sedation-induced respiratory compromise. This article is a retrospective analysis of 49 patients at high-risk of complications, who undergone unsedated peroral PEG tube placement.Materials and Methods: PEG was placed in 49 patients through the peroral endoscopic way without sedation. The patients were given pharyngeal anesthesia and the PEG tubes were inserted using the ‘pull ‘ technique. The comorbidities, PEG indications, pharyngeal anesthesia indications, arterial oxygen saturations throughout the procedure, the comfort and the tolerability score and complications were recorded.Results: Of all patients 27 (55.1%) were female and 22 (44.9%) were male. The mean age of the patients was 81 (range: 33–99) years. PEG procedure was performed due to the loss of swallowing reflex and dysphagia in 24 (48.9%), replacement of the previously inserted PEG tube in 11 (22.5%), malnutrition in 9 (18.3%) and nasogastric tube intolerance in 5 (10.2%) patients. Unsedated procedure was performed due to aspiration pneumonia in 21 (42.8%), chronic pulmonary disease in 10 (20.4%), request from patient relatives in 15 (30.6%), and on patient’s own request in 3 (6.1%). Modified Gloucester Comfort Scale was used to evaluate the comfort and the tolerability of the patients. According to the scale, 24.4% of the patients showed no signs of discomfort, 42.8% showed mild signs of discomfort yet well tolerated the procedure. Only 8.1% showed significant discomfort. As complications, tube dislodgement was observed in 3 patients and wound infections were recorded in 4 patients.Conclusion: PEG placement using a peroral route without sedation is a safe and well-tolerated method in patients with high sedation risk.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜL, G., AYDIN, M. A. (2020). Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement without sedation in high-risk patients: A safe and well-tolerated technique. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 174–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/345106

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Alverdy J, Chi HS, Sheldon GF. The effect of parenteral nutrition on gastrointestinal immunity. The importance of enteral stimulation. Ann Surg 1985;202:681–4
  2. Deitch EA, Ma WJ, Ma L, Berg RD, Specian RD. Protein malnutrition predisposes to inflammatory-induced gut-origin septic states. Ann Surg 1990;211:560–7
  3. Hucl T, Spicak J. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016;30:769–81
  4. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:7739–51
  5. Stiegmann GV, Goff JS, Silas D, Pearlman N, Sun J, Norton L. Endoscopic versus operative gastrostomy: final results of a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1990;36:1–5
  6. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:872–5
  7. Erdogan A. Single endoscopist-performed percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:4172–6
  8. Steed H, Barrett D, Emm C, Lycett W, O’Toole S, Evans K, et al. Unsedated percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy insertion: a safe, effective, and well-tolerated method. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2012;36:231–4
  9. Johnston SD, Tham TC, Mason M. Death after PEG: results of the National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:223–7
  10. Ball AJ, Rees CJ, Corfe BM, Riley SA. Sedation practice and comfort during colonoscopy: lessons learnt from a national screening programme. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;27:741–6
  11. Wollman B, D’Agostino HB. Percutaneous radiologic and endoscopic gastrostomy: a 3-year institutional analysis of procedure performance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169:1551– 3
  12. Dumortier J, Lapalus MG, Pereira A, Lagarrigue JP, Chavaillon A, Ponchon T. Unsedated transnasal PEG placement. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:54–7
  13. Vitale MA, Villotti G, D’Alba L, De Cesare MA, Frontespezi S, Iacopini G. Unsedated transnasal percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in selected patients. Endoscopy 2005;37:48–51
  14. Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F, Pellissier PE, Leprince E, Pujol B, et al. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:198–204
  15. Trevisani L, Cifalà V, Sartori S, Gilli G, Matarese G, Abbasciano V. Unsedated ultrathin upper endo