Dergiler / Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science / 2020 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

The effectiveness of routine drain placement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Single–center results

Sayfa
61–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Neglected drainage can contribute to faster recovery,shortened hospital stay, and reduced cost without causing additional surgical complications.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Routine drainage of the abdominal cavity has been widely accepted in the diagnosis and treatment of complications, but many studies have questioned the usefulness of drainage.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To determine whether routine drainage is required after LSG, we aimed to compare clinical data and complications between groups.Materials and Methods: This study included a retrospective analysis of LSGs from January 2017 to November 2019.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Neglected drainage can contribute to faster recovery,shortened hospital stay, and reduced cost without causing additional surgical complications.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Introduction: Routine drainage of the abdominal cavity has been widely accepted in the diagnosis and treatment of complications, but many studies have questioned the usefulness of drainage. In complications afterlaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), the value of routine drainage is unknown. To determine whether routine drainage is required after LSG, we aimed to compare clinical data and complications between groups.Materials and Methods: This study included a retrospective analysis of LSGs from January 2017 to November 2019. Groups were defined as (Group D) with and without a drain (Group U). Complication diagnosis wasconfirmed using computed tomography (CT) or endoscopy after suspicion. Clear fluid was administeredat the 6th postoperative hour. Data included age, height, body weight, BMI, mean operative time, length ofhospital stay, and complications. Data between groups were compared.Results: The mean age of 744 patients (female=570, male=174) was 38 years (18–63), and the mean preoperative BMI was 47.9 kg/m2 (40–76). The hospitalization time was 4.03 days (2–23), and the operationswere performed at an average of 83 minutes (30–225). There were Group D=547, Group U=197 patients. Thecomplication rate was 6.7%. Sixteen of the 17 patients who were on the run were in group D and one in GroupU. In Group D, 14 of the leaks were treated with stents, and 15 of them were treated with a percutaneouscatheter, while in Group U, only one patient was treated using stents. The decrease in hemoglobin value was3.07 g/dl on average, and bleeding was detected in 33 patients (Group D=22, Group U=11). Percutaneouscatheter was applied to five patients in Group D.Conclusion: Routine drainage is not required after LSG. Neglected drainage can contribute to faster recovery,shortened hospital stay, and reduced cost without causing additional surgical complications.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SEYİT, H., FERAHMAN, S., PEKER, K. D., KARABULUT, M., GÖKÇAL, F., ALIŞ, H. (2020). The effectiveness of routine drain placement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Single–center results. Laparoscopic Endoscopic Surgical Science, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 61–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/345092

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Lee WJ, Wang W. Bariatric surgery: Asia-pacific perspective. Obes Surg 2005;15:751–7
  2. Fisher BL, Schauer P. Medical and surgical options in the treatment of severe obesity. Am J Surg 2002;184:9–16
  3. Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011-2018. Available at: http://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatricsurgery-numbers. Accessed Jun 10, 2020
  4. Chazelet C, Verhaeghe P, Perterli R, Fennich S, Houdart R, Topart R, et al. Longitudinal sleeve gastrectomy as a standalone bariatric procedure: results of a multicenter retrospecThe effectiveness of routine drain placement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: Single-center results 65 tive study. J Chir 2009;146:368–72
  5. Petrowsky H, Demartines N, Rousson V, Clavien PA. Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Ann Surg 2004;240:1074–84
  6. Inaba CS, Koh CY, Bhaskar SS, Silva JP, Chen Y, Nguyen DV, et al. One-Year Mortality after Contemporary Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the Bariatric Outcomes Longitudinal Database. J Am Coll Surg 2018;226:1166–74
  7. Chowdri NA, Qadri SA, Parray FQ, Gagloo MA. Role of subcutaneous drains in obese patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy: a cohort study. Int J Surg 2007;5:404–7
  8. Mirzai H, Eminoglu M, Orguc S. Are drains useful for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, randomized clinical study. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:171–7
  9. Scevola S, Youssef A, Kroll SS, Langstein H. Drains and seromas in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2002;48:511–4
  10. Liscia G, Scaringi S, Facchiano E, Quartararo GM, Lucchese M. The role of drainage after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2014;10:171–6
  11. Rosenthal RJ. International Sleeve Gastrectomy Expert Panel Consensus Statement: best practice guidelines based on experience of 12,000 cases. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2012;8:8–19
  12. Sağlam K, Kayaalp C, Gündoğan E, Sansal M, Aktaş A, Gökler C, et al. Staple line bleeding control with monopolar cautery in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Laparosc Endosc Surg Sci 2019;26:181–4
  13. Christophorou D, Valats JC, Funakoshi N, Duflos C, Picot MC, Vedrenne B, et al. Endoscopic treatment of fistula after sleeve gastrectomy: results of a multicenter retrospective study. Endoscopy 2015;47:988–96
  14. Vix M, Diana M, Marx L, Callari C, Wu HS, Perretta S, et al. Management of Staple Line Leaks After Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Consecutive Ser