Dergiler / Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları / 2015 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Preoperative evaluation and surgical outcomes of congenital aural atresia

Doğ uştan aural atrezinin ameliyat öncesi değerlendirilmesi ve cerrahi sonuçları

Sayfa
8–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Obtaining successful surgical and functional outcomes is strongly related to preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up along with surgical technique and surgeons experience.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: In this study we aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative evaluation on functional surgical outcomes in congenital aural atresia surgery which is one of the most challenging procedures of otolaryngology.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients and Methods: Twelve patients (8 males, 4 females; mean age 12.9±6.8 years; range 6 to 32 years) who underwent surgery for unilateral congenital aural atresia in our clinic between October 2007 and April 2013 were included in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Obtaining successful surgical and functional outcomes is strongly related to preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up along with surgical technique and surgeons experience.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: In this study we aimed to investigate the effect of preoperative evaluation on functional surgical outcomes in congenital aural atresia surgery which is one of the most challenging procedures of otolaryngology. Patients and Methods: Twelve patients (8 males, 4 females; mean age 12.9±6.8 years; range 6 to 32 years) who underwent surgery for unilateral congenital aural atresia in our clinic between October 2007 and April 2013 were included in this study. All patients were performed pre- and postoperative physical examination, and audiologic and radiologic evaluation. Patients were preoperatively evaluated according to Altmanns classification and Jahrsdorfers surgery indication classification. All patients were operated under general anesthesia using transatretic (anterior) approach. Results: According to preoperative evaluation, three patients had Altmann type 1 minor malformation and nine patients had type 2 moderate malformation. No patient had type 3 major malformation. Congenital cholesteatoma was detected in two patients. According to Jahrsdorfers surgery indication classification, three patients were excellent, four patients were very good, four patients were good and one patient was fair candidates for functional surgery. Mean air- bone gap was 43±4.1 (range 38-50) dB at postoperative sixth week, 36.3±3.4 (range 30-42) dB at postoperative third month, 30.4±2.6 (range 28-35) dB at postoperative sixth month, and 30.2±2.1 (range 25-35) at postoperative 12th month. One patient (9%) developed postoperative infection, and two patients (18%) developed restenosis. Conclusion: Preoperative evaluation of patients in congenital aural atresia surgery is of vital importance in terms of surgical success. Obtaining successful surgical and functional outcomes is strongly related to preoperative evaluation and postoperative follow-up along with surgical technique and surgeons experience.

Abstract

A maç: Bu çalışmada otolarengolojinin en zor işlemlerinden biri olan doğuştan aural atrezi cerrahisinde ameliyat öncesi değerlendirmenin fonksiyonel cerrahi sonuçlar üzerine etkisi araştırıldı. Hastalar ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmaya Ekim 2007 - Nisan 2013 tarihleri arasında kliniğimizde tek taraflı doğuştan aural atrezi nedeni ile ameliyat edilen 12 hasta (8 erkek, 4 kız; ort. yaş 12.9±6.8 yıl; dağılım 6-32 yıl) dahil edildi. Tüm hastalara ameliyat öncesi ve sonrası fizik muayene ile odyolojik ve radyolojik değerlendirme yapıldı. Hastalar ameliyat öncesi Altmann sınıflaması ve Jahrsdorfer cerrahi endikasyon sınıflamasına göre değerlendirildi. Hastaların tümü transatrezik (anterior) yaklaşım kullanılarak genel anestezi altında ameliyat edildi. Bulgular: Ameliyat öncesi değerlendirmeye göre, üç hastada Altmann tip 1 minör malformasyon ve dokuz hastada tip 2 orta malformasyon vardı. Hiçbir hastada tip 3 majör malformasyon yoktu. İki hastada doğuştan kolesteotom saptandı. Jahrsdorfer’in cerrahi endikasyon sınıflamasına göre, fonksiyonel cerrahi için üç hasta mükemmel, dört hasta çok iyi, dört hasta iyi ve bir hasta orta adaylardı. Ortalama hava-kemik aralığı ameliyat sonrası altıncı haftada 43±4.1 (dağılım 38-50) dB, üçüncü ayda 36.3±3.4 (dağılım 30-42) dB, altıncı ayda 30.4±2.6 (dağılım 28-35) dB ve 12. ayda 30.2±2.1 (dağılım 25-35) dB idi. Bir hastada (%9) ameliyat sonrası enfeksiyon, iki hastada (%18) restenoz gelişti. Sonuç: Doğuştan aural atrezi cerrahisinde hastaların ameliyat öncesi değerlendirilmesi cerrahi başarı açısından büyük önem taşır. Cerrahi ve fonksiyonel açıdan başarılı sonuçlar elde etmek cerrahi tekniği ve cerrahın deneyiminin yanı sıra ameliyat öncesi değerlendirme ve ameliyat sonrası takibe bağlıdır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERYILMAZ, M. A., KİBAR, A., VARSAK, Y. K., ARBAĞ, H. (2015). Preoperative evaluation and surgical outcomes of congenital aural atresia. Kulak Burun Boğaz Uygulamaları, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 8–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/343494

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. De la Cruz A, Linthicum FH Jr, Luxford WM. Congenital atresia of the external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 1985;95:421-7
  2. Kösling S, Omenzetter M, Bartel-Friedrich S. Congenital malformations of the external and middle ear. Eur J Radiol 2009;69:269-79
  3. Crabtree JA, Harker LA. Developmental anomalies of the ear. In: Cummings CW, Frederickson JM, Harker LA, Krausse CJ, Schüller DE, editors. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p. 2746-55
  4. Oliver ER, Hughley BB, Shonka DC, Kesser BW. Revision aural atresia surgery: indications and outcomes. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:252-8
  5. Teufert KB, De la Cruz A. Advances in congenital aural atresia surgery: effects on outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131:263-70
  6. Beahm EK, Walton RL. Auricular reconstruction for microtia: part I. Anatomy, embryology, and clinical evaluation Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;109:2473-82
  7. Kaga K, Setou M, Nakamura M. Bone-conducted sound lateralization of interaural time difference and interaural intensity difference in children and a young adult with bilateral microtia and atresia of the ears. Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121:274-7
  8. Moore DR. Critical periods for binaural interaction and spatial representation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1986;429:51-5
  9. Linstrom CJ, Aziz MH, Romo T 3rd. Unilateral aural atresia in childhood: case selection and rehabilitation. J Otolaryngol 1995;24:168-79
  10. Granström G, Bergström K, Tjellström A. The bone- anchored hearing aid and bone-anchored epithesis for congenital ear malformations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;109:46-53
  11. De la Cruz A, Chandradekhor SJ. Auditory canal and timpanum. In: Cummings CW, Frederickson JM, Harker LA, Krausse CJ, Schüller DE, editors. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. 3nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1998. p. 454-60
  12. Lambert PR, Dodson EE. Congenital malformations of the external auditory canal. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1996;29:741-60
  13. Chang SO, Jeon SJ, Jeong HS, Kim CS. Prevention of postoperative meatal stenosis with anteriorly and inferiorly based periosteal flaps in congenital aural atresia surgery. Otol Neurotol 2002;23:25-8
  14. Tollefson TT. Advances in the treatment of microtia. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14:412-22
  15. Chandrasekhar SS, De la Cruz A, Garrido E. Surgery of congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 1995;16:713-7
  16. Battelino S, Hocevar-Boltezar I, Zargi M. Intraoperative use of mitomycin C in fibrous atresia of the external auditory