Dergiler / Mugla Journal of Science and Technology / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SINGLE-PHASE PWM RECTIFIER CONTROL TECHNIQUES

Sayfa
44–51
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The synchronization with the grid voltage is achieved with all techniques, and the DC voltage is regulated with active power.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, 2.5 kW single-phase pulse-width modulated rectifier is simulated with three different control techniques to investigate the performance of controllers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the performance comparison of the control techniques, considering the switching frequencies, the total harmonic content of the current drawn from the grid, the phase difference between the grid voltage and the grid current, and the DC bus voltage regulation at the output are considered as comparison criteria.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The synchronization with the grid voltage is achieved with all techniques, and the DC voltage is regulated with active power.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:hysteresis current control · Sinusoidal PWM · Rectifier

Abstract

In this study, 2.5 kW single-phase pulse-width modulated rectifier is simulated with three different control techniques to investigate the performance of controllers. Rectifier simulation is performed in Matlab / Simulink environment by using hysteresis current control, sinusoidal pulse width modulation and voltage oriented control techniques. In the performance comparison of the control techniques, considering the switching frequencies, the total harmonic content of the current drawn from the grid, the phase difference between the grid voltage and the grid current, and the DC bus voltage regulation at the output are considered as comparison criteria. The switching frequency is set to 35 kHz in sinusoidal pulse width modulation and voltage oriented control techniques. Since the switching frequency is variable in the hysteresis current control technique, the average and instantaneous switching frequency are calculated for different hysteresis band values. In the results with the technique, the switching frequency varies between 18.52 kHz and 47.6 kHz, while the average switching frequency is 34.6 kHz. As a result, the total harmonic distortion of the grid current with hysteresis current control, sinusoidal pulse width modulation and voltage oriented control techniques is 3.69%, 1.12% and 1.82%, respectively. The synchronization with the grid voltage is achieved with all techniques, and the DC voltage is regulated with active power.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İŞEN, E. (2021). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SINGLE-PHASE PWM RECTIFIER CONTROL TECHNIQUES. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 44–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/340998

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Pichan, M., Abrishamifar, A., Ahmad, A.A. and Fazeli, M., “Simple and Efficient Design and Control of the Single Phase PWM Rectifier for UPS Applications”, 8th Power Electronics, Drive Systems & Technologies Conference, 2017, 383-388.
  2. Mansour, M., Mansouri, M.N., Bendoukha, S. and Mimouni, M.F., “A grid-connected variable-speed wind generator driving a fuzzy-controlled PMSG and associated to a fly Wheel energy storage system”, Electric Power Systems Research, Vol. 180, 1-13, 2020.
  3. Pan, L. and Zhang, C., “Model Predictive Control of a Single-Phase PWM Rectifier for Electric Vehicle Charger”, Energy Procedia, Vol. 105, 4027-4033, 2017.
  4. Tawfeeq, O.T., Ibrahim, A.Y. and Alabbawi, A.A.M., “Study of a Five-Level PWM Rectifier Fed DC Motor Drive”, 7th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2020, 126-129.
  5. Afghoul, H., Krim, F., Chikouche, D. and Beddar, A., “Design and real time implementation of fuzzy switched controller for single phase active power filter”, ISA Transactions, Vol. 58, 614-621, 2015.
  6. Ilonciak, J., Struharnansky, L. and Kuchta, J., “Modular concept of auxiliary converters for diesel electric locomotives”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 192, 359-364, 2017.
  7. Mengi, O., Yanmaz, K. and Altaş, I.H., “STATCOM application with FLC and voltage control on the load in the hybrid model of fuel cell/solar panels system”, Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 3 No. 1, 45-50, 2017.
  8. Kolar, J.W. and Friedli, T., “The Essence of Three-Phase PFC Rectifier Systems-Part I”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 28, No. 1, 176-198, 2013.
  9. Mohan, N. Undeland, T. and Robbins, W., Power Electronics-Converters, Application, and Design. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Canada, 1995.
  10. McCarty, M., Taufik, T., Pratama, A. and Anwari, M., “Harmonic analysis of input current of single- phase controlled bridge rectifier”, IEEE Symposium on Industrial Electronics & Applications, 2009, 520-524.
  11. Frisfelds, K. and Krievs, O., “Design of a three-phase bidirectional PWM rectifier with simple control algorithm”, Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, Vol. 16, No. 3, 3-12, 2019.
  12. Cho, Y., Han, Y., Madhusoodhanan, S., Ha, J.I. and Bhattacharya, S., “Synchronous Frame Full-Order Observer Design for Three-Phase Buck-Type PWM Rectifier”, 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, 2016, 3618-3622.
  13. Sawachan, H., Liutanakul, P. and Wiwatcharagoses, N., “A Simple Dead-Time Compensation Technique for Single-Phase Full-