Dergiler / Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 37

THE DISCIPLINE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT

Sayfa
995–1007
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The relationship between the administration and the management of the company, which was expressed as the most affected by the discipline, was discussed and the positive and negative effects of these relations were discussed.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The discipline of public administration is defined as an interdisciplinary field.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This aspect of public administration, which uses the theories, methods and approaches of the disciplines of political science, administrative law and business management, has recently been cited as the cause of public administration crisis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The relationship between the administration and the management of the company, which was expressed as the most affected by the discipline, was discussed and the positive and negative effects of these relations were discussed.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The discipline of public administration is defined as an interdisciplinary field. This aspect of public administration, which uses the theories, methods and approaches of the disciplines of political science, administrative law and business management, has recently been cited as the cause of public administration crisis. In this study, the question of whether interdisciplinary position of public administration affects discipline positively or negatively. Since the establishment of public administration, the relations with different disciplines are examined; the separation of political science and administrative law from the discipline in the foundation period and its approach to the management of the enterprise were examined. The relationship between the administration and the management of the company, which was expressed as the most affected by the discipline, was discussed and the positive and negative effects of these relations were discussed.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAVAS, B. (2019). THE DISCIPLINE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: NEW PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 37, 995–1007. https://ajindex.com/articles/338665

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Bluntschlı, J. C. (1875). The Theory of the State, Oxford, (Printed at the Clarendon Press, London). Drechsler, W. (2005), “The Rise and Demise of the New Public Management”, Post-Autistic Economics Review, No. 33, 14 September 2005, pp. 17-28; http://www.paecon.net/PAEReview/issue33/Drechsler33.htm; 08.09.2011.
  2. Eryılmaz, B. (2010). Kamu Yönetimi: Düşünceler, Yapılar, Fonksiyonlar, Okutman Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  3. Genç, N. (2010). “Yeni Kamu Hizmeti Yaklaşımı”, Türk İdare Dergisi, S.466, Mart 2010, ss.145-159; http://www.tid.gov.tr/Makaleler/466fnevalgenc.pdf; 07.09.2011.
  4. Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and Administration: A Study in Government, The Macmillan Company, NewYork; http://www.archive.org/download/ politicsadminist00goodrich/politicsadminist00goodrich.pdf 03.09.2011.
  5. Güler, B. A. (2005). Kamu Yönetimi Yaklaşımları Nasıl Sınıflandırılabilir?; Yaklaşımları Sınıflandırmak, Çalışma notu, 1 Kasım 2005; http://80.251.40.59/ politics.ankara.edu.tr/bguler/pdf/kysiniflan.pdf; 07.09.2011.
  6. Karasu, K. (2004). Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Kökenine İlişkin Bir Not, II.Kamu Yönetimi Forumu, Ankara; http://kamyon.politics.ankara.edu.tr /bulten/belgeler/04.pdf; 14.07.2011.
  7. Keskin, N. E. (2006). “Türkiye’de Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Köken Sorunu”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt 39, Sayı 2, Haziran 2006, s. 1-28.
  8. Kettl, D. F. (2011). “The Future of Public Administration”, Humanities & Social Sciences Online; www.hnet.org/~pubadmin/tfreport/kettl.pdf; 03.09.2011.
  9. Leblebici, D. N. (2001). “Disiplin ve Uygulama Açısından Kamu Yönetiminin “Kimlik Krizine” Yeni Bir Bakış, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Mayıs 2001, C.25, No.1, ss. 15-24.
  10. Martin, D. W. (1987). “Deja Vu: French Antecedents of American Public Administration”, Public Administration Review, V. 47, No. 4, July - August 1987‘den aktaran Martin, D. W. (1988). “The Fading Legacy of Woodrow Wilson”, Public Administration Review, V. 48, No. 2, March – April 1988, pp. 631-636.
  11. Özer, M. A. (2006). “Kamu Yönetiminde Kimlik Bunalımı Üzerine Değerlendirmeler”, Sayıştay Dergisi, Sayı: 61, Nisan-Haziran 2006.
  12. Parlak, B. and Sobacı, Z. (2005). Kuram ve Uygulamalarda Kamu Yönetimi: Ulusal ve Global Perspektif, Alfa Akademi Yayınları,
  13. İstanbul.
  14. Pestritto, R. J. (2005). Woodrow Wilson and the roots of modern liberalism, (Rowman & Littlefield Publisher Inc.). Raadschelders, J. C. N. (1999). “A Coherent Framework for the Study of Public Administration”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 9, pp.281-30