KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Bilimin İkilemi: Belirlenirlik ya da Belirlenmezlik

A. Selami SARGUT
Sayfa
121–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SARGUT, A. S. (2002). Bilimin İkilemi: Belirlenirlik ya da Belirlenmezlik. Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 121–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/336553

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Abadan, N. 1996.
  2. Kum saatini izlerken, İstanbul:
  3. İletişim. Ackroyd, S. 1994. Re-creating common ground: Elements for post-paradigmatic organization studies, Hassard, J. ve Parker, M. (der.), Towards a New Theory of Organizations, içinde London: Routledge, ss:269-297.
  4. Ackroyd, S. ve Thompson, P. 1999.
  5. Organizational misbehaviour, London: Sage. Adler, P ve Borys, B. 1993. Materialism and idealism in organizational research, Organization Studies, 14(5), ss: 657-674.
  6. Altuğ, T. 2001.
  7. Dile gelen felsefe, İstanbul:
  8. YKY Yayınları.
  9. Alvesson, M. ve Willmott, H. 1992. On the idea of emancipation in management and organization studies, Academy of Management Review, 17(3), ss: 432- 464. Alveson, M. ve Willmott, H. 1996. Making sense of management: A critical introduction, London: Sage. Alvesson, M. ve Deetz, S. 1999. Critical theory and postmodernism: approaches to organizational studies, Clegg, S. ve Hardy, C. (der.) Studying Organization içinde London: Sage, ss. 185-211.
  10. Alvesson, M. ve Deetz, S. 2000.
  11. Doing critical management research, London: Sage. Alvesson, M. ve Karreman, D. 2000. Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis, Human Relations, 53(9), ss: 1125-1149.
  12. Baruch, Y. 2001. Global or North American: A geographical based comparative analysis of publications in top management journals, International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), ss: 109-126.
  13. Bauman, Z. 1988.
  14. Is there a postmodern sociology, Theory, Culture and Society, 5(2), ss: 217-237.
  15. Berger, P. ve Luckmann,T. 1971.
  16. The social construction of reality, London: Penguin. Bjorkergen, D. 1993. What can organization and management theory learn from art? Hassard, J. ve Parker, M. (der), Postmodernism and Organizations içinde, London: Sage, ss: 101-113.
  17. Boje, D.M., Fitzgibbons D.E ve SteinGard D.S. 1996. Storytelling at administrative science quarterly, Boje, D.M., Gephard, R. F. ve Thatchenkery T.J. (der.) Postmodern Management and Organization Theory, içinde, Thousand Oaks: Sage, ss: 60-92.
  18. Bryman, A. 1989. Research methods and organization studies, London: Unwin and Hyman. Burrell, G. 1988. Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis 2: The contribution of michel foucault, Organization Studies, 9(2), ss: 221-235.
  19. Burrell, G. 1999. Normal science, paradigms, metaphors, discourses and genealogies of analysis, Clegg, S. ve Hardy, C. (der.) Studying Organization içinde London: Sage, ss. 388-404.
  20. Burrell, G. 2001. Ephemera: Critical dialogues on organizati