Dergiler / Üroonkoloji Bülteni / 2018 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4

Impact of Delay from Biopsy to Surgery on the Rate of Adverse Pathologic and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Sayfa
133–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our findings indicate that RP should be performed within 60 days of biopsy for intermediate-risk patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Due to the widespread usage of prostate-specific antigen screening, the number of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer is steadily increasing.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The data of 359 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in our clinic between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our findings indicate that RP should be performed within 60 days of biopsy for intermediate-risk patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Due to the widespread usage of prostate-specific antigen screening, the number of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer is steadily increasing. Many factors such as high operating room demand, insurance reimbursement, patients’ desire to assess multiple treatment options, and anxiety can cause delays in radical treatment. In this study, we examined the effect of delay from prostate biopsy to surgery on outcomes of men with localized prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: The data of 359 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in our clinic between 2008 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Surgical delay was defined as the time from transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy to surgery. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the interval between prostate biopsy and RP (≤60, 61-120, ≥120 days) and classified according to the D’Amico risk classification. Results: A total of 248 patients were included in the study. Of these patients, 107 (43.1%) were operated within 60 days of biopsy, 113 (45.6%) 61120 days after biopsy, and 28 (11.3%) over 120 days after biopsy. Statistical analysis of patients with follow-up of at least 12 months did not reveal a significant difference between the groups in terms of biochemical recurrence (p=0.06). A delay of over 120 days was not associated with adverse pathological or oncological findings at surgery for the low-risk group. Extraprostatic invasion increased significantly in the intermediate-risk group with longer surgical delay (p=0.044). Conclusion: Our data demonstrated that a delay of more than 120 days was not associated with adverse pathological outcomes in men with low-risk localized prostate cancer. For men with intermediate-risk disease, delays over 60 days were significantly associated with risk of extraprostatic invasion. Our findings indicate that RP should be performed within 60 days of biopsy for intermediate-risk patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ANIL, H., KARAMIK, K., TAŞ, S., ISLAMOGLU, E., ÖZSOY, Ç., YÜKSEL, M., ATEŞ, M., SAVAŞ, M. (2018). Impact of Delay from Biopsy to Surgery on the Rate of Adverse Pathologic and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 4, 133–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/334432

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68:7-30.
  2. Boyle P, Severi G, Giles GG. The epidemiology of prostate cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2003;30:209-217.
  3. Tosoian JJ, Trock BJ, Landis P, et al. Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2185-2190.
  4. Krakowsky Y, Loblaw A, Klotz L. Prostate cancer death of men treated with initial active surveillance: clinical and biochemical characteristics. J Urol 2010;184:131-135.
  5. Iremashvili V, Manoharan M, Pelaez L, et al. Clinically significant Gleason sum upgrade: External validation and head-to-head comparison of the existing nomograms. Cancer 2011;118:378-385.
  6. Freedland SJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL, et al. Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: Risk factors and clinical implications. Urology 2007;69:495-499.
  7. Colleselli D, Pelzer AE, Steiner E, et al. Upgrading of gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2010;13:182-185.
  8. Freedland SJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL, et al. Delay of radical prostatectomy and risk of biochemical progression in men with low risk prostate cancer. J Urol 2006;175:1298-1302.
  9. Iremashvili V, Manoharan M, Rosenberg DL, et al. Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy in patients initially managed by active surveillance: a comparative analysis. Prostate 2012;72:1573-1579.
  10. Sainsbury R, Johnston C, Haward B. Effect on survival of delays in referral of patients with breast-cancer symptoms: a retrospective analysis. Lancet 1999;353:1132-1135.
  11. Roncoroni L, Pietra N, Violi V, et al. Delay in the diagnosis and outcome of colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol 1999;25:173-178.
  12. Graefen M, Walz J, Chun KH, et al. Reasonable delay of surgical treatment in men with localized prostate cancer-impact on prognosis? Eur Urol 2005;47:756-760.
  13. Van den Bergh RC, Steyerberg EW, Khatami A, et al. Is delayed radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk screen-detected prostate cancer associated with a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes? Cancer 2010;116:1281-1290.
  14. Shibata A, Mohanasundaram UM, Terris MK. Interval from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy: Effect on PSA, Gleason sum, and risk of recurrence. Urology 2005;66:808-813. Dall’Era MA, Cowan JE, Simko J, et al. Surgical management after active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: Pathological outcomes compared with men undergoing