Dergiler / European Journal of Biology / 2017 / Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the Mechanism of Physiological Tolerance in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Cultivars under Drought Stress Conditions

Sayfa
31–35
Yayın Tarihi
2017-12-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, it can be concluded that Fırat 87 and Çiftçi cultivars are more resistant to drought than the Sultan cultivar.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is valued throughout the world for human and animal nutrition because of its high protein, vitamin, and mineral contents.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Lentil production has decreased worldwide due to global warming.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, it can be concluded that Fırat 87 and Çiftçi cultivars are more resistant to drought than the Sultan cultivar.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Lentil · drought stress · oxidative stress

Abstract

Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) is valued throughout the world for human and animal nutrition because of its high protein, vitamin, and mineral contents. Lentil production has decreased worldwide due to global warming. Although the physiological parameters of lentil plants have been examined under drought conditions, its tolerance mechanism has not been fully elucidated yet. In this study, lentil seedlings following germination were exposed to drought stress using 15% polyethylene glycol (PEG) application for 7 days. The untreated control plants were allowed to grow under conditions similar to that of germination. Oxidative stress responses (relative water content, chlorophyll content, H2O2 formation, lipid peroxidation, and proline accumulation) were compared in leaf samples of experimental and control group plants grown for 7 days under drought stress. Although the physiological and biochemical responses of the cultivars Fırat 87 and Çiftçi were close to each other, proline accumulation, malondialdehyde, and H2O2 levels were found to increase in the Sultan cultivar. Thus, it can be concluded that Fırat 87 and Çiftçi cultivars are more resistant to drought than the Sultan cultivar.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MORGİL, H., GERCEK, Y. C., CALİSKAN, M., OZ, G. C. (2017). Investigation of the Mechanism of Physiological Tolerance in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) Cultivars under Drought Stress Conditions. European Journal of Biology, Cilt: 76 - Sayı: 1, 31–35. https://ajindex.com/articles/33231

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Coskuner Y, Karababa E. Production Potential and Processing Technology of Lentil in Turkey. Gıda 1998; 3: 201-9
  2. Kumar S, Rajendran K, Kumar J, Hamwieh A, Baum M. Current knowledge in lentil genomics and its application for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci 2015; 6: 78
  3. Srivastava RP. Vasishtha H. Saponins and lectins of Indian chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) and lentils (Lens culinaris). Indian J Agric Biochem 2012; 25(2): 44-7
  4. Lawlor DW, Cornic G. Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. Plant Cell Environ 2002; 25(2): 275-94
  5. Foyer CH, Noctor G. Tansley Review No
  6. Oxygen processing in photosynthesis: regulation and signalling. New Phytologist 2012; 112: 359-88
  7. Peltzer DE, Dreyer E, Polle A. Differential temperature dependencies of antioxidative enzymes in two contrasting species: Fagus sylvatica and Coleus blumei. Plant Physiol Biochem 2002; 40(2): 141-50
  8. Sairam RK, Deshmukh PS, Saxena DC. Role of antioxidant systems in wheat genotypes tolerance to water stress. Biol Plantarum 1998; 41: 387-94
  9. Khan AJ, Hassan S, Tariq M, Khan T. Haploidy breeding and mutagenesis for drought tolerance in wheat. Euphytica 2001; 120(3): 409-14
  10. Singh D, Singh CK, Tomar RS, Taunk J, Singh R, Maurya S, et al. Molecular assortment of Lens species with different adaptations to drought conditions using SSR markers. PLoS One 2016; 11(1): e0147213
  11. Steward CR, Hanson AD. Proline Accumulation as a Metabolic Response to Water Stress. In Adaptation of Plant to Water and High Temperatures Stress’ Wiley. 1980; 173-89
  12. Tan BH, Halloran GM. Variation and correlations of proline accumulation in spring wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 1980; 22(3): 459-63
  13. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. Growing plants without soil by the water-culture method. Circ. Calif Agric Exp Stn 1938
  14. Dhanda SS, Sethi GS. Inheritance of excised-leaf water loss and relative water content in bread wheat (Triticumastivum). Euphytica 1998; 104: 39-47
  15. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris, Plant Physiol 1989; 24(1): 1-15
  16. Sairam R. K, Saxena, D. C. Oxidative stress and antioxidants in wheat genotypes: possible mechanism of water stress tolerance. J Agron Crop Sci 2000; 184(1): 55-61
  17. Bates L. S, Waldren R. P, Teare I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 1973; 39(1): 205-7
  18. Teranashi Y, Tanaka A, Osumi M, Fukui S. Catala