Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 5

Age, Growth and Mortality of Unio tigridis (Bourguignat, 1852)

Sayfa
613–617
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although, there is no fishing, no pollution and no predation risk on this species yet, due to growth characteristic, high K and low L∞, this type of species are vulnerable to extinction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Unio tigridis has an importance for the biodiversity of freshwater ecosystem of the Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total 428 of specimen were collected using by divers with hand dredges in depth of 1 to 6 meters based on annual sampling strategy from June- 2004 to May- 2005.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although, there is no fishing, no pollution and no predation risk on this species yet, due to growth characteristic, high K and low L∞, this type of species are vulnerable to extinction.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2004 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Unio tigridis has an importance for the biodiversity of freshwater ecosystem of the Turkey. However, there is no available literature in the world on the growth of this species yet. The aim of this study, therefore, was to describe the age, growth and mortality of this species living in Lake Gölbaşı from Hatay providence, Turkey. A total 428 of specimen were collected using by divers with hand dredges in depth of 1 to 6 meters based on annual sampling strategy from June- 2004 to May- 2005. Lengths and weighs of sample were ranged as 2.1 to 9.2 cm (6.79 ± 1.52) and 1.1 to 73.05 g (34.18 ± 15.56), respectively. Weight-Length relationship of all specimens was described as W=0.193L2.63 (R2=0.94). Thus, a negative allometric growth was detected in the sampled population. The age of each individual was determined by counting the external shall annuli-growth interruption lines. The sampled population was composed of 18 age classes. Specimen belong to age class 7 was the most presented with 20.33 percent in the population. The rate of male to female (m:f) was 0.91:1. Seasonalized von Bertalanffy growth model (SVBGM) was used to describe the growth. From these results, it was shown that seasonality in growth does not occur in this lake for this species (L∞ = 8.80 cm (Shell Length), K = 0.271 year-1 , t0 = -0.161 year, C = 0.014, ts = 0.100 year with RSS = 23.22). The total mortality rate (Z ± Se) was calculated as 0.401 ± 0.015 year-1 with Rsquare = 0.99 (CL of Z with 95 % = 0.361 - 0.440 year-1 ). Although, there is no fishing, no pollution and no predation risk on this species yet, due to growth characteristic, high K and low L∞, this type of species are vulnerable to extinction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CAN, M. F., ŞEREFLİŞAN, H. (2018). Age, Growth and Mortality of Unio tigridis (Bourguignat, 1852). Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 5, 613–617. https://ajindex.com/articles/332069

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Akiyama YB, Iwakuma T. 2009. Growth parameters of endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera laevis, Unionoida). Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 175(4): 295-305. Aldridge DC. 1999. The morphology, growth and reproduction of Unionidae (Bivalva) in a Fenland waterway. J.Moll.Stud., 65: 47-60.
  2. Al-Mahdawi M, Al-Dulaimi M. 2004. Reproductive bahavior of freshwater clams Unio tigridis (Bou.) and Pseudodontopsis euphraticus (Bou.) in Al- Habbanyah Lake, Iraq. Journal of King Abdul Aziz University Marine Sciences, 15(1): 3-20.
  3. Başçınar NS, Düzgüneş E, Mısır DS, Polat H, Zengin B. 2009. Growth and flesh yield of the swan mussel [Anodonta cygnea (Linnaeus, 1758)] (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the lake Çıldır (Kars, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 9: 127-132. Bauer G. 1991. Plasticity in life history traits of the freshwater pearl mussel. In: Seitz A and Loeschcke W (Eds.), Species Conservation: A population biological approach. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, pp. 103-120. Bauer G. 1992. Variation in the life span and size of the freshwater pearl mussel. Journal of Animal Ecology, 61: 425–436.
  4. Can MF, Günlü A, Can HY. 2015. Fish consumption preferences and factors influencing it. Food Science and Technology, 35: 339-346.
  5. Geldiay R, Bilgin FH. 1969. Some Mollusks Species identified from the Different Region of Turkey (in Turkish). Ege University Press (Technical Report No: 190), İzmir, 36 p. Haddon M. 2001. Modelling and Quantitative Methods in Fisheries. Chapman & Hall Book, Boca Raton. ISBN: 1- 58488-177-1.
  6. Hastie LC, Young MR, Boon PJ. 2000.Growth characteristics of freashwater paerl mussels, Margaritifera margaritifera (L.). Freshwater Biology, 43: 243-256. Hoggarth MA. 1999. Description of some of the glochidia of the Unionidae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Malacologia, 41: 1-118.
  7. Jupiter SD, Byrne M. 1997. Light and scanning electron microscopy of the embryos and glochidia larvae of the Australian freshwater bivalve Hyridella depressa (Hyriidae). Invertebr. Reprod. Dev., 32:177–186. King M. 1996.
  8. Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management. Fishing New Books, USA, 341p. Malathi S, Thippeswamy S. 2013. Population ecology of freshwater mussel Parreysia corrugate (Mullar, 1774) from River Malthi, Tributary of river Tunga in the Western Ghats, India. Recent Research in Science and Technology, 5(4): 20- 26. Maroñas ME, Darrigran GA, Sendra MR, Breckon G. 2003.
  9. Shell growth of the golden mussel, Limnoperna fortune (Dunker