Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 5

Relationships Between Dye Reduction Test Scores and Somatic Cell Count in Bovine Raw Milk

Sayfa
557–560
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this study, correlation and determination coefficients of SCC with MTS and RTS were calculated to be r=0.279; R2=0.149 and r=0.18; R2=0.097 and, it was concluded that dye reduction tests are not suitable to reliably determine the quality of bovine raw milk.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to reveal the relationships between dye reduction test scores and somatic cell count (SCC) in bovine raw milk.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The SCC, methyelene blue reduction scores (MTS) and resazurin reduction test scores (RTS) were determined at biweekly intervals in four test days (TD) between March and April 2017 in a total of 89 raw milk samples sold in Samsun province as unpacked.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this study, correlation and determination coefficients of SCC with MTS and RTS were calculated to be r=0.279; R2=0.149 and r=0.18; R2=0.097 and, it was concluded that dye reduction tests are not suitable to reliably determine the quality of bovine raw milk.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The aim of this study was to reveal the relationships between dye reduction test scores and somatic cell count (SCC) in bovine raw milk. The SCC, methyelene blue reduction scores (MTS) and resazurin reduction test scores (RTS) were determined at biweekly intervals in four test days (TD) between March and April 2017 in a total of 89 raw milk samples sold in Samsun province as unpacked. While SCC values were recorded by an automatic counter, all SCC values were transformed to log10 base before statistical analysis. In MTS method, the time for the change of the color of milk from blue to white was noted and milk quality was assessed using a 1 to 4 point scale (1=>5hgood/excellent; 2=2-5h-medium; 3=0.5-2h-bad and 4=<0.5h-very bad). The change of milk color caused by resazurin solution after one-hour incubation at 37°C was evaluated by a 1 to 3 point scale (1=blue-very well; 2=mauve/deep pink-medium and 3=light blue/uncolored-poor). While significant differences were determined among logSCC means by TD groups after one-way analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA), effects of TD on MTS or RTS were insignificant. Besides, when the samples were examined by lower or higher than 500×103 cells/ml that assumed as the threshold for SCC in this study, no significant effect of SCC on the MTS or RTS. In this study, correlation and determination coefficients of SCC with MTS and RTS were calculated to be r=0.279; R2=0.149 and r=0.18; R2=0.097 and, it was concluded that dye reduction tests are not suitable to reliably determine the quality of bovine raw milk.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YALÇIN, B. K., ATASEVER, S. (2018). Relationships Between Dye Reduction Test Scores and Somatic Cell Count in Bovine Raw Milk. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 5, 557–560. https://ajindex.com/articles/332063

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Atasever S, Erdem H, Kul E. 2012. Using viscosity values for determining somatic cell count in cow milk. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7(4): 741-745.
  2. Bilkis T, Islam M, Sumy MC, Mandal NA, Uddin GN. 2013. Rapid estimation of quality of raw milk for its suitability for further processing in the dairy industries of Bangladesh. Int. J. Dairy Sci., 8(1): 1-11.
  3. Braide W, Awiya H, Akien-Ali IJ, Lugbe PB, Oranusi US, Ayebabohoa M. 2015. Bacteriological examination of fresh cow milk and fura de nunu using rapid dye reduction test. Pyrex J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res., 1 (3): 28-37.
  4. Davut M, Atasever S. (2017). Seasonal changes of composition and somatic cell count of bucket milk from Jersey crossbred cows in Northern Turkey, 11th Int.Symp. - Modern Trends in Lives. Prod. (Oct. 11-13),
  5. Belgrade-Serbia. Demirci M, Oksuz O, Simsek O, Kurultay S, Kıvanc M, Gunduz HH, Ucan N. 2010.
  6. Controlling Milk and Its Products, Published by University of Anadolu, No: 2064, 254, Eskisehir, Turkey (In Turkish). De Silva SASD, Kanugala KANP, Weerakkody NS. 2016. Microbiological quality of raw milk and effect on quality by implementing good management practices. Procedia Food Science, 6, 92-96.
  7. Erdem H, Atasever S, Kul E. 2010. Determination of Milk Production Characteristics and Milk Losses Related to Somatic Cell Count in Jersey Cows Raised in the Black Sea Region of Turkey. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 5: 217-222. Koc A. 2008. Factors influencing daily yield, somatic cell count and non-fat dry matter content of milk. Indian Vet. J., 85: 630-632. Kramomtong I Tripipat T Koowatananukul C, Rangwises S, Ajariyakhajorn K. 2007. Relation between microorganisms, lactic acid production, and dye reduction tests in raw milk. Proceedings Chula. Univ. Vet. Sci. Ann. Con., 26-27
  8. April, Thailand. Mahari AT, Yemane H. 2016. Cow Milk Handling Practices and Factors Contributing to Quality Deterioration in Ethiopia. Food Sci. Qual. Man., 48: 14-17.
  9. Mikone Jonas E, Atasever S, Graff M, Erdem H. 2016. Nongenetic factors affecting milk yield, composition and somatic cell count in Hungarian Holstein cows. J. Fac. Vet. Med. Kafkas Univ., 22 (3): 361-366.
  10. Miller RH, Norman HD, Wiggans GR, Wright JR. 2004. Relationship of test day somatic cell score with test day and lactation milk yields. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 2299-2306.
  11. Muliro PS, Shalo PL, Kutima PM. 2013. Quality assessment of raw camel milk using dye reduction tests. African J. Food Sci. Techn., 4(5): 116-121.