KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 8

Macro-anatomical and Morphometric Investigation of the Tongue and Lingual Papillae in the Guinea fowl (Numida meleagridis)#

RAMAZAN İLGÜN
Nilgün KURU
Ferhan BÖLÜKBAŞ
FATİH MEHMET GÜR
Sayfa
1233–1236
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, in this study, the anatomy and morphometric of the tongue of the guinea fowl tongue were examined in details and the similarities and differences between the tongue of the guinea fowl and the tongue of other poultry species were investigated.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to investigate the macroanatomy and morphometric of the tongue of the guinea fowl.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Six chicks (6-7 weeks), six layer hens (9-13 weeks) and six studs guinea fowl were used to study and determine the anatomical features of the tongue of the guinea fowl.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, in this study, the anatomy and morphometric of the tongue of the guinea fowl tongue were examined in details and the similarities and differences between the tongue of the guinea fowl and the tongue of other poultry species were investigated.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The aim of this study was to investigate the macroanatomy and morphometric of the tongue of the guinea fowl. Six chicks (6-7 weeks), six layer hens (9-13 weeks) and six studs guinea fowl were used to study and determine the anatomical features of the tongue of the guinea fowl. Papillae of the tongue were examined photos of the general anatomic structures were taken. Morphometry was calculated by statistical analysis. The tongue was triangular shaped, and consisted of apex, corpus, and radix sections. The papillae linguales caudales were on both sides of the corpus and radix linguae. Conical papillae were found to be sequentially V shaped at the radix. Thus, in this study, the anatomy and morphometric of the tongue of the guinea fowl tongue were examined in details and the similarities and differences between the tongue of the guinea fowl and the tongue of other poultry species were investigated.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İLGÜN, R., KURU, N., BÖLÜKBAŞ, F., GÜR, F. M. (2019). Macro-anatomical and Morphometric Investigation of the Tongue and Lingual Papillae in the Guinea fowl (Numida meleagridis)#. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 8, 1233–1236. https://ajindex.com/articles/331978

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Aytekin Ö. 2016. Systema digestorium. In: Girgin, A., Alabay, B., Liman, N., Özer, A. (eds): Veterinary Special Histology. 4stedn., İstanbul. Nobel Publication. pp.151-156.
  2. Baumel JJ, King SA, Breazile JE, Evans, HE, et al. 1993. Handbook of Avian anatomy. Nomina Anatomica Avium, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Publications of Nuttall Ornithological Club. pp. 257-299. Büyüköztürk S. 2011. Data Analysis Handbook in Social Sciences. Ankara. Pegem publication. pp.145-166.
  3. Crole MR, Soley JT. 2009. Morphology of the tongue of the Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). I. Gross Anatomical Features and Topography. The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research., 76: 335-345, DOI: 10.4102/ojvr.v76i3.39, indexed in Pubmed: 21105602. Crole MR, Soley, JT. 2009. Morphology of the tongue of the Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). II. Histological features. The Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research., 76: pp.347- 361, DOI: 10.4102/ojvr.v76i4.18, indexed in Pubmed: 21344785. Crole MR, Soley JT. 2010. Surface morphology of the tongue of the Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) tongue. Anatomia Histologia Embryologia., 39: pp. 355-365, DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2010.01002.x, indexed in Pubmed: 20491751. Dursun N. 2014. Anatomy of Domestic Birds. Ankara. Medisan Publication. pp. 12-45.
  4. Dyke GJ, Gulas BE, Crowe TM. 2003. Suprageneric relationships of galliform birds (Aves, Galliformes): a cladistic analysis of morphological characters. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society., 137: pp. 227-244. DOI:10.1046/j.1096- 3642.2003.00048.x. El-Bakary NER. 2011. Surface morphology of the tongue of the hoopoe (Upupa Epops). ACS Combinatorial Science., 7 (1): pp.394-399.
  5. Elsheikh EH, Al-Zahaby Sh. 2014. A. Light and scanning electron microscopial studies of the tongue in the Hooded crow (Aves: Corvus corone cornix). The Journal of Basic & Applied Zoology., 67: 83-90, DOI:org/10.1016 /j.jobaz.2014.08.004. Emura S, Chen, H. 2008 Scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the owl (Strix uralensis). Anatomia Histologia Embryologia., 37: pp.475-478, DOI:10.1111/j.1439- 0264.2008.00871.x, indexed in Pubmed: 19032633. Erdoğan S, Sağsöz H, Akbalık ME. 2012. Anatomical and histological structure of the tongue and histochemical characteristics of the lingual salivary glands in the chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar, Gray 1830). British Poultry Science., 53: pp.307–315, DOI: 10.1080/00071668.2012.700507, indexed in Pubmed: 22978586 Erdoğan S, Iwasaki S. 2014. Function-related morphological characteris