Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 12

Seafood Consumption Attributes and Buying Behaviours According to the Generations: A Study on Millennial Generation in Turkish Market

Sayfa
1604–1608
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The fact that the Millennial’s average response to consumption and purchasing is higher indicates that they are more cautious

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper focus on the seafood consumption attitudes and behaviours of the millennials (Generation Y) and non-millennials (Generation X, Baby Boomers and Silent Generation) comparatively.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data was collected from a face to face survey which was applied to randomly select 407 individuals in the city of Adana, Turkey in November 2016.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The fact that the Millennial’s average response to consumption and purchasing is higher indicates that they are more cautious
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This paper focus on the seafood consumption attitudes and behaviours of the millennials (Generation Y) and non-millennials (Generation X, Baby Boomers and Silent Generation) comparatively. The data was collected from a face to face survey which was applied to randomly select 407 individuals in the city of Adana, Turkey in November 2016. As a result of factor analysis applied in the study, it was found that Millennials was significantly and inversely correlated with consumption of wild fish and freshwater fish. Non-millennial generation was inversely correlated with consumption of marine fish, freshwater fish and mussels and the correlation is insignificant. According to the results of the chi square test, it was determined that Millennials mostly preferred to consume fresh (unprocessed) fish. Mann-Whitney test results show that they value health and nutrition factors for consumption and there is a significant difference between these two factors. Besides, factors mainly effecting their purchase behaviour of seafood are directed to freshness, seasonality, place of purchase and wild-aquaculture product classification and there are significant differences between these factors. The fact that the Millennial’s average response to consumption and purchasing is higher indicates that they are more cautious

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNEY, O. İ., SANGÜN, L. (2017). Seafood Consumption Attributes and Buying Behaviours According to the Generations: A Study on Millennial Generation in Turkish Market. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 12, 1604–1608. https://ajindex.com/articles/331541

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Blank C. 2014. Top story:Meet the new boss-marketing to millennials. Seafood Business Magazine. Available from: http://www.seafoodsource.com/news/environmentsustainability/top-story-meet-the-new-boss-marketing-tomillennials.
  2. Dölekoğlu CÖ, Şahin A, Giray FH. 2014. Factor influencing the consumption of functional food in women: A study in the Mediterranean region. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 21:572- 584. Erdoğan BE, Mol S, Coşansu S. 2011. Factors Influencing the Consumption of Seafood in Istanbul, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 11: 631-639.
  3. Geethalakshmi V, Ashaletha S, Raj D, Nasser M. 2013. Consumer preference and willingness to pay for value added fish products in Palakkad, Kerala. Indian Journal of Fisheries, 60(3): 67-71.
  4. Guney OI, Sangun L. 2017. Olive oil consumption attitudes as a healthy food. A survey study on young consumers. Agro Food Industry Hi-tech, 28(4): 56-59.
  5. Hewlett SA, Sherbin L, Sumberg K. 2009. How gen Y and boomers will reshape your agenda. Harvard Business Review, 87(7- 8):71-76.
  6. Inglehart R, Carballo M. 1997. Does Latin America exist? (and is there a confucian culture?): A global analysis of cross-cultural differences. Political Science and Politics, 30:34-47.
  7. Keskin S, Daskira I, Kor A. 2007. Factor analysis scores in a multiple linear regression model for the prediction of carcass weight in Akkeci kids. J. Appl Anim Res., 31: 201-204.
  8. Kuhns A, Saksena M. 2016. How millennial food purchase decisions compare to previous generations. Agricultural & Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts. Lancaster LC, Stillman D. 2003. When generations collide: Who they are? Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work: Harper Business. New York, USA. pp 42-49. Morton LP. 2002. Targeting generation Y. Public Relations, 47(2): 46-48.
  9. Muralidharan S, Rejón-Guardia F, Xue F. 2016. Understanding the green buying behaviour of younger millennials from India and the United States: A structural equation modelling approach. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(1): 54–72.
  10. Nichols SB, Raska ND, Flint DJ. 2015. Effects of consumer embarrassment on shopping basket size and value: A study of the millennial consumer. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14: 41–56. Ordun G. 2015. Millennial (gen Y) consumer behaviour, their shopping preferences and perceptual maps associated with brand loyalty. Canadian Social Science, 11 (4): 40-55. Peskett S. 2006. Under-30s are the big spenders in UK market. H