Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 7

Land Ownership and Profitability of Greenhouse Production: Antalya Case

Sayfa
930–935
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition, it appeared as essential to provide incentives to renters to cope with their costs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Agricultural production and income are important for Mediterranean region of Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In order to measure the potential for improving greenhouse operators 281 farmers were surveyed in 2015 in Antalya and profit inefficiency and factors affecting inefficiencies of operators were estimated using stochastic frontier approach.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition, it appeared as essential to provide incentives to renters to cope with their costs.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Agricultural production and income are important for Mediterranean region of Turkey. The region and especially Antalya province is well-known with greenhouse production. For greenhouse production achieving sustainability is important for meeting domestic and foreign demand and security of production lands. In order to measure the potential for improving greenhouse operators 281 farmers were surveyed in 2015 in Antalya and profit inefficiency and factors affecting inefficiencies of operators were estimated using stochastic frontier approach. Accordingly, the average inefficiency level of operators was found as 57 %, signifying the potential for improvement. The main objective was to undermine the impact of landownership on this inefficiency level. Yet, the impact of other relevant factors referring to greenhouse structures and famers’ characteristics were estimated as well. While level of education seemed to reduce inefficiency, household size had appeared as an inefficiency rising factor referring to professional labour endowment of greenhouse production in Antalya. Being renter of land appeared as an inefficiency rising factor as well as holding plastic house or having located in the western parts of Antalya. These findings indicated importance of supporting improved production technologies and use of strengthened structures. In addition, it appeared as essential to provide incentives to renters to cope with their costs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CEYLAN, R. F., SAYIN, C., YELBOĞA, M. N. M., ÖZALP, M., İLBASMIŞ, E., SAV, O. (2018). Land Ownership and Profitability of Greenhouse Production: Antalya Case. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 7, 930–935. https://ajindex.com/articles/331361

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P. 1977. Formulation and Estimation of stochastic frontier production models. Journal of Econometrics. 6:21-32.
  2. Aktas AR, Ozturk E, Hatirli SA. 2011. Analysis of Profit Inefficiencies in Turkish Hazelnut Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 17:230-240.
  3. Ali F, Parikh A, Shah MK. 1994. Measurement of Profit Efficiency Using Behavioural and Stochastic Differences in Frontier Approaches. Applied Economics. 26(2): 181-88. Anonymous. 2012. Antalya Provincial Directorate of Food, Agriculture and Animal Breeding. Strategic Plan for Antalya Agriculture. Antalya. 2012-2016: 47-68. Anonymous. 2013. Antalya Provincial Directorate of Food, Agriculture and Animal Breeding Agricultural Investment Manual for Antalya, http://www.tarim.gov.tr/SGB/ TARYAT/Belgeler/guncellenmesigererkenilyatirim/antalya. docx Anonymous. 2018. TUIK data retrieved from https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr on 02.03.2018
  4. Battese GE, Coelli TJ. 1995. A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effect in Stochastic Frontier Production for Panel Data. Empirical Economics. 20, 325-345.
  5. Battese GE, Corra GS. 1977. Estimation of a Production Function Model with Applied to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics. 21, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 8489.1977.tb00204.x Bezlepkina IV. 2002. What is Behind the Fall in Russian Agricultural Production? The Xth EAAE Congress Exploring Diversity in the European Agri –Food System, Zaragoza (Spain), 28-31 August 2002.
  6. Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R. 1998.
  7. Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications. 98-351. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637501082 Ersoy S. 2015. 2015 Yılının Doğa Kaynaklı Afetleri “Dünya ve Türkiye” – Natural Disasters of 2015 “the World and Turkey”. Chamber of Geology Engineers Publication. Ankara. ISBN: 978-605-01-0854-5. http://www.jmo.org.tr/ resimler/ekler/cb5590ed725b536_ek.pdf Ersoy S. 2016. 2016 Yılı Doğa Kaynaklı Afetler Yıllığı “Dünya ve Türkiye” - 2016 Yearbook of Natural Disasters“the World and Turkey”. Chamber of Geology Engineers Publication. Ankara. ISBN: 978-605-01-1005-0. http://www.jmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/9c6533fe59fd883_ek.p df Farrell MJ. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 120/ 253-290.
  8. Guan Z, Kumbhakar SC, Myers RJ, Lansink AO. 2009. Measuring Excess. Capital Capacity in Agricultural Production. American