Dergiler / Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 11

Effects of Brining and Picking Time on The Degradation of Pesticide Residue in Grapevine Leaves

Sayfa
1773–1779
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is proposed that better to use contact fungicides instead of systemic one and also viticulturists should be careful using the effective contact fungicides.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Intensive pesticide use in vineyard resulted in residue problem on vine leaves that are used as food.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In first treatment, leaf samples were boiled in hot (98±2°C) tap water, then leaves were placed into jars, then filled with brine containing 8.0% salt + 0.25% lactic acid.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is proposed that better to use contact fungicides instead of systemic one and also viticulturists should be careful using the effective contact fungicides.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Intensive pesticide use in vineyard resulted in residue problem on vine leaves that are used as food. This study was aimed at development of a proper chemical control program to reduce the pesticide residue problem on vine (cv. Narince) leaves in vineyards during the growing period. The residues of some fungicides were determined according to spraying time in the fresh (unprocessed) and preserved (brined) leaves. Additionally, the effects of preservation process on degradation of the fungucides residues were investigated. In this study three fungicides (Azoxystrobin, Triadimenol, Hexaconazole) were applied alternately for both powdery mildew and “Colomerus vitis” management, and two fungucides (Copper oxychloride, Metalaxyl + Mancozeb) for downy mildew control. Additionaly vine leaves were harvested at two different times: (i) before the half-life of the pesticides were reached and (ii) after the half-life of the pesticides have elapsed. Two different methods were applied to preserve the vine leaves. In first treatment, leaf samples were boiled in hot (98±2°C) tap water, then leaves were placed into jars, then filled with brine containing 8.0% salt + 0.25% lactic acid. In second treatment, vine leaves were placed into jars, then filled with tap water and brine containing 8.0% salt+0.25% lactic acid. The residue levels of the fungicides were determined on leaves. Detectable copper and the other fungucide residues are compared according to Turkish Food Codex. Preserving applications were decreased fungicide and copper residue levels and hot water brining was decreased the levels of fungicide residues between 75.2% and 99.2%, according to the applications. As a result, systemic fungicides should not be used in vineyards in where pickled vine leaves are produced. It is proposed that better to use contact fungicides instead of systemic one and also viticulturists should be careful using the effective contact fungicides.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANGİ, R., YANAR, Y., DÜLGEROĞLU, Y. (2019). Effects of Brining and Picking Time on The Degradation of Pesticide Residue in Grapevine Leaves. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 11, 1773–1779. https://ajindex.com/articles/331314

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Abdollahzadeh E, Ojagh S M, Hosseini H, Ghaemi EA, Irajian G, Heidarlo MN. 2016. Antimicrobial resistance of Listeria monocytogenes isolated from seafood and humans in Iran. Microb. Pathog. 100: 70-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath. 2016.09.012. EFSA and ECDC 2018. European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA Journal,16(12): 5500, 262. https://doi.org/10.2903 /j.efsa.2018.5500 Acha, PN, Szyfres B. 2001. Zoonoses and Communicable Diseases Common to Man and Animals. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Oficina Sanitaria Panamericana, Oficina Regional de la Organización Mundial de la Salud 525 Twenty-third Street, NW Washington, DC 20037, EUA. https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2017/AchaZoonosis-Spa.pdf (Accessed 20-05-2019)
  2. Buchanan RL, Gorris LG, Hayman MM, Jackson TC, Whiting RC. 2017. A review of Listeria monocytogenes: an update on outbreaks, virulence, dose-response, ecology, and risk assessments. Food Control, 75: 1-13. https://doi.org /10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.12.016 CAC/GL 61. 2007. Guidelines on the application of general principles of food hygiene to the control of Listeria monocytogenes in foods. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. World Health Organization. Codex Alimentarius. International Food Standards. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/shproxy/en/?lnk=1andurl=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspac e.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FC XG%2B61-2007%252FCXG_061e.pdf (Accessed 10-06- 2019) CAC/RCP 61.2005. Code of practice to minimize and contain antimicrobial resistance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. World Health Organization. Codex Alimentarius. International Food Standards. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/shproxy/es/?lnk=1andurl=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspac e.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FC XC%2B61-2005%252FCXP_061e.pdf (Accessed 10-06- 2019) CAC/GL 77.2011. Guidelines for risk analysis of foodborne antimicrobial resistance. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. World Health Organization. Codex Alimentarius. International Food Standards. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/shproxy/es/?lnk=1andurl=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspac e.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FC XG%2B77-2011%252FCXG_077e.pdf (Accessed 05-07- 2019) Cardozo Bernal ÁM, Ramón Luisa F, Poutou