Dergiler / Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Evaluating the Element Contents of Durum Wheat LandracesPure Lines in Çanakkale Conditions

Sayfa
368–374
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Promising candidates were selected for future breeding programs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Wheat landraces are often utilized in breeding programsfor their potential to improve the grain qualityof new varieties.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Our goal is to evaluate thousand kernel weights (TKW), percentages of the yellowberry kernels (PYK), B, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, S and Zn contents of 25 landracesderived durum wheat pure lines collected from the fauna of Turkeyto identify promising candidates.Field trials were conducted in Çanakkale in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 growing seasons and element contents of pure lineswere determined by using ICP-OES.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Promising candidates were selected for future breeding programs.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:2015-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Wheat landraces are often utilized in breeding programsfor their potential to improve the grain qualityof new varieties. Our goal is to evaluate thousand kernel weights (TKW), percentages of the yellowberry kernels (PYK), B, Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Ni, P, S and Zn contents of 25 landracesderived durum wheat pure lines collected from the fauna of Turkeyto identify promising candidates.Field trials were conducted in Çanakkale in 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 growing seasons and element contents of pure lineswere determined by using ICP-OES. Differences between durumwheatlandraces werefound statistically significant by all traits (p<0.01). Correlation analysis demonstrated that Ca, Cu and Mg contents of pure lines were positively correlated to each other. Results suggestedavaluable variability amongdurum wheat genotypes in terms of their element contents. Promising candidates were selected for future breeding programs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HOCAOĞLU, F. O., AKÇURA, M., KAPLAN, M. (2020). Evaluating the Element Contents of Durum Wheat LandracesPure Lines in Çanakkale Conditions. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 368–374. https://ajindex.com/articles/330367

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Anonymous.2019. Toprak Mahsulleri Ofisi Genel Müdürlüğü 2019 Dönemi Hububat Alım Baremi. (http://www.tmo.gov.tr)(In Turkish. Date of access: 11.06.2019).
  2. Akçura, M. 2011. The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 35(2), 115-125.
  3. Akcura, M., Turan, V., Kokten, K., Kaplan.,M. 2019. Fatty acid and some micro element compositions of cluster bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) genotype seeds growing under Mediterranean climate. Industrial crops and products, 128: 140-146.
  4. Altıntaş, S., Toklu, F., Kafkas, S., Kilian, B., Brandolini, A.,Özkan, H. 2008. Estimating genetic diversity in durum and bread wheat cultivars from Turkey using AFLP and SAMPL markers. Plant Breeding, 127(1), 9-14.
  5. Ateş Sönmezoğlu, Ö., Bozmaz, B., Yildirim, A., Kandemir, N., Aydin, N. 2012. Genetic characterization of Turkish bread wheat landraces based on microsatellite markers and morphological characters. Turkish Journal of Biology, 36(5), 589-597.
  6. Cakmak, I.,Pfeiffer,W. H. 2010. Biofortification of Durum Wheat with Zinc and Iron. Cereal Chem. 87(1):10–20.
  7. Ficco, D. B. M., Riefolo, C., Nicastro, G., De Simone, V., Di Gesu, A. M., Beleggia, R., Platani, C., Cattivelli, L., De Vita, P. 2009. Phytate and mineral elements concentration in a collection of Italian durum wheat cultivars. Field Crops Research, 111(3), 235-242.
  8. Figliuolo, G., Mazzeo, M., Greco, I. 2007. Temporal variation of diversity in Italian durum wheat germplasm. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54(3), 615-626.
  9. Gökgöl, M. 1939.
  10. Türkiye Buğdayları Cilt II, Yeşilköy Tohum Islah Enstitüsü, YayınNo: 14. Güleç,T. E., Sönmezoğlu,Ö. A., Yıldırım,A. 2010. Makarnalık bugdaylarda kalite ve kaliteyi etkileyen faktörler. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2010(1), 113-120.
  11. Hakkı, E. E., Dograr, N., Pandey, A., Khan, M. K., Hamurcu, M., Kayis, S. A., Gezgin, S, Ölmez, F., Akkaya, M. S. 2014. Molecular and elemental characterization of selected Turkish durum wheat varieties. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 42(2), 431-439.
  12. Hocaoğlu, O., Akçura, M. 2014. Evaluating yield and yield components of pure lines selected from bread wheat landraces comparatively along with registered wheat cultivars in Canakkale ecological conditions. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(Özel Sayı-2), 1528-1539. Kabbaj,H., Sall A. T., Al-Abdallat,A., Geleta,M., Amri,A., Filali-Maltouf,A., Belkadi,B., Ortiz,R., Bassi,F. M. 2017. Genetic Diversity within